Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (14): 54-59.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0597
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Yanping1(), XU Jingying2, WEI Hao3, WU Shufeng3, JIN Jing3, PENG Qichao3, ZHOU Shilong3, DENG Zuke3
Received:
2022-07-12
Revised:
2022-09-25
Online:
2023-05-09
Published:
2023-05-09
LI Yanping, XU Jingying, WEI Hao, WU Shufeng, JIN Jing, PENG Qichao, ZHOU Shilong, DENG Zuke. Investigation on Soil Environment and Pear Fruit Quality in Pinggu Pear Orchards of Beijing[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(14): 54-59.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0597
分级 | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有效铜/ (mg/kg) | 有效锌/ (mg/kg) | 有效锰/ (mg/kg) | 有效铁/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 | >40 | >150 | >40 | >200 | >1.80 | >3.00 | >30 | >20 |
二级 | 30~40 | 120~150 | 20~40 | 150~200 | 1.01~1.80 | 1.01~3.00 | 15.1~30 | 10.1~20 |
三级 | 20~30 | 90~120 | 10~20 | 100~150 | 0.21~1.00 | 0.51~1.00 | 5.1~15.0 | 4.6~10 |
四级 | 10~20 | 60~90 | 5~10 | 50~100 | 0.11~0.20 | 0.31~0.50 | 1.1~5.0 | 2.6~4.5 |
五级 | 6~10 | 30~60 | 3~5 | 30~50 | — | <0.30 | — | — |
六级 | <6 | <30 | <3 | <30 | — | — | — | — |
分级 | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有效铜/ (mg/kg) | 有效锌/ (mg/kg) | 有效锰/ (mg/kg) | 有效铁/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 | >40 | >150 | >40 | >200 | >1.80 | >3.00 | >30 | >20 |
二级 | 30~40 | 120~150 | 20~40 | 150~200 | 1.01~1.80 | 1.01~3.00 | 15.1~30 | 10.1~20 |
三级 | 20~30 | 90~120 | 10~20 | 100~150 | 0.21~1.00 | 0.51~1.00 | 5.1~15.0 | 4.6~10 |
四级 | 10~20 | 60~90 | 5~10 | 50~100 | 0.11~0.20 | 0.31~0.50 | 1.1~5.0 | 2.6~4.5 |
五级 | 6~10 | 30~60 | 3~5 | 30~50 | — | <0.30 | — | — |
六级 | <6 | <30 | <3 | <30 | — | — | — | — |
项目 | 范围/(mg/kg) | 平均值/(mg/kg) | 一级/% | 二级/% | 三级/% | 四级/% | 五级/% | 六级/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碱解氮 | 49~350 | 155 | 44.00 | 24.00 | 16.00 | 10.00 | 6.00 | 0.00 |
有效磷 | 8~633 | 172 | 81.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效钾 | 100~1469 | 589 | 85.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
项目 | 范围/(mg/kg) | 平均值/(mg/kg) | 一级/% | 二级/% | 三级/% | 四级/% | 五级/% | 六级/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碱解氮 | 49~350 | 155 | 44.00 | 24.00 | 16.00 | 10.00 | 6.00 | 0.00 |
有效磷 | 8~633 | 172 | 81.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效钾 | 100~1469 | 589 | 85.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
项目 | 范围/(mg/kg) | 平均值/(mg/kg) | 一级/% | 二级/% | 三级/% | 四级/% | 五级/% | 六级/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效铜 | 0.3~20.2 | 4.0 | 77.00 | 20.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效铁 | 5.5~47.7 | 18.5 | 31.00 | 63.00 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效锰 | 2.3~46.0 | 9.0 | 3.00 | 9.00 | 64.00 | 24.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效锌 | 1.4~65.3 | 10.2 | 76.00 | 24.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
项目 | 范围/(mg/kg) | 平均值/(mg/kg) | 一级/% | 二级/% | 三级/% | 四级/% | 五级/% | 六级/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效铜 | 0.3~20.2 | 4.0 | 77.00 | 20.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效铁 | 5.5~47.7 | 18.5 | 31.00 | 63.00 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效锰 | 2.3~46.0 | 9.0 | 3.00 | 9.00 | 64.00 | 24.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
有效锌 | 1.4~65.3 | 10.2 | 76.00 | 24.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
[1] |
张玉星. 果树栽培学各论[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003:69.
|
[2] |
刘军, 刘松忠, 鲁韧强, 等. 北京地区梨园土壤养分状况调查与分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(1):73-75.
|
[3] |
赵静. 土壤酸化对土壤有效养分、酶活性及黄金梨品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2011:48.
|
[4] |
田瑞, 胡红菊, 陈启亮, 等. 湖北省砂梨5个主产县梨园土壤养分状况调查与分析[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 10(29):4-5,7-10.
|
[5] |
陈启亮, 杨晓平, 范净, 等. 利川市梨园养分投入及土壤养分状况分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(21):69-72,93.
|
[6] |
姜福东, 于强, 李庆余, 等. 莱阳茌梨园土壤养分状况分析[J]. 落叶果树, 2018, 50(4):14-17.
|
[7] |
宋瑞娟. 黄河流域主要梨园土壤养分及树体营养丰缺状况分析[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2019.
|
[8] |
董彩霞, 谢昶琰, 李红旭, 等. 黄河流域主要梨园土壤养分丰缺状况[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(1):88-96.
|
[9] |
范健, 任静华, 廖启林, 等. 苏南典型区农田土壤硒-镉拮抗作用研究[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(5):1023-1032.
|
[10] |
王鹏, 曹鹏, 齐开杰, 等. 水质对梨树液体授粉的花粉萌发率的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(2):145-147.
|
[11] |
朱永福. 生活再生水滴灌水肥和限根对苹果光合、产量及品质的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2022.
|
[12] |
张云霞, 史桂芬, 熊坤. 气象条件对宁陵酥梨品质的影响分析[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2021, 11(6):95-97.
|
[13] |
张子申. 果实发育天数与着果位置对梨果实品质影响[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2022.
|
[14] |
王清敏, 田召玲, 崔秀峰. 不同结果部位对阳信鸭梨果实品质的影响[J]. 落叶果树, 2021, 53(4):24-25.
|
[15] |
薛泽宇, 胡朝慧, 刘婷婷, 等. 水平棚架式栽培对玉露香梨脱萼率和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2022(3):21-25.
|
[16] |
邢小青. 梨果套袋效应试验分析[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2021, 33(4):30-33.
|
[17] |
李艳婷, 徐雷, 周铮. 梨果套袋技术现状及展望[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(9):62-65.
|
[18] |
张朋朋, 王小丫, 陶书田, 等. 果园生草栽培年限对库尔勒香梨果实形态特征和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(22):22-28.
|
[19] |
王莉, 叶小梅, 杜静, 等. 沼液不同施用方式对梨园土壤及梨果产量品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(20):138-143.
|
[20] |
曲潇琳, 高明聪, 刘克桐. 土壤改良水肥管理技术在秋月梨上的应用[J]. 河北果树, 2021(3):18-19.
|
[21] |
玄志友. 采前覆膜控水提升梨果品质[J]. 中国果业信息, 2021, 38(11):61.
|
[22] |
王世明. 喷施含硒叶面肥显著提高梨果品质[J]. 中国果业信息, 2019, 36(12):50.
|
[23] |
郭永福. 生防技术对减药不套袋梨园梨小食心虫防效和果实品质的影响[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2020.
|
[24] |
李志辉, 张娟, 张冬林, 等. 日本藤梨果实品质及营养成分分析[J]. 经济林研究, 2010, 28(2):96-98.
|
[25] |
刘彩云, 彭章普, 魏晋梅. 酸巴梨营养成分分析[J]. 食品工业, 2017, 38(2):292-295.
|
[1] | SHEN Jianguo, SU Guijun, LOU Ling, HE Linhai, HU Kangying. Effects of Salt Washing Methods on Soil Salinity and Nutrient Content and Vegetable Growth in Facility Agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 69-73. |
[2] | XIE Kunhao, SHI Aokun, DI Qinghua, CHEN Ru, LI Yansu, YU Xianchang, CHEN Shuangchen, HE Chaoxing. Effects of Vegetable Residue Compost on Ginger Yield and Soil Environment in Root Zone [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 87-91. |
[3] | ZHANG Jiajia, ZHANG Yue, LI Huawei, LI Hui. Analysis of Soil Nutrient Status in Yellow River Floodplain of Henan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 76-82. |
[4] | CHEN Zhenlu, PAN Xiaoying, LU Yusheng, HUANG Zhenrui, GU Wenjie, GUO Junjie, WEI Bin, ZENG Yuling, LIU Yixuan, HE Jingwei, LI Jiqin. Effects of Organic-inorganic Compound Conditioner on Acidified Soil Properties and Tobacco Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 28-34. |
[5] | WAN Qian, WANG Ruoshui, XIAO Wan, LUO Chengwei, DOU Xiaoyu, WANG Lisha, XIONG Chang, WANG Xin, DAI Houshuai. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Belt Deployment Methods on Nutrient Distribution and Utilization Characteristics of Apple-Soybean Alley Cropping System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 64-73. |
[6] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[7] | CHEN Hui, ZHOU Xiaoyue, TAN Cheng, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Milk Vetch Returning to Field on the Content of Soil Nutrient and Heavy Metal [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 80-85. |
[8] | GESANG Dunzhun. Soil Nutrient Status Analysis and Soil Fertility Comprehensive Evaluation in Luolong County of Changdu City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 30-34. |
[9] | YANG Shaosong, ZHENG Fengping, SHEN Shicai, XU Gaofeng, WEN Lina, JIN Guimei, TAO Qiong, ZHANG Fudou. Current Invasion Situation and Control Strategy of Solidago canadensis in Yunnan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 83-89. |
[10] | WANG Lixia, YIN Xiaomin, LIU Yongxia, LIAN Zihao, WANG Bizun, HE Yingdui. Change Characteristics of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Papaya Under Papaya-Leek Intercropping [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 66-76. |
[11] | PAN Xue, CAI Liqun, DONG Bo, NIE Guangyun. The Quality Grade and Nutrient Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Pingchuan District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 118-128. |
[12] | HU Yi, WANG Jing, LI Gang. Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Fertility Grade Evaluation of Newly-increased Farmland in Weibei Dryland: A Case Study of Heyang County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 94-100. |
[13] | YANG Min, CHEN Xiuhu, PI Xiaojuan, GUO Feng, CHEN Xinmiao, HU Jiewen. Migration and Distribution Characteristics of Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Rice Terrace Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 50-55. |
[14] | LI Zongtai, ZHAN Lijie, LIANG Yan, GE Zhongqiang, CAO Zhenfei, DU Zhenyu, DUN Xingjian. Leaf Stoichiometric Characteristics of Japanese Red Pine Forest in Shandong Province and Their Correlation with Stand Characteristics and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 20-30. |
[15] | WANG Qixu, LI Jianyong. Analysis and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Vegetable Fields in Shanghai Suburbs [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 84-88. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||