Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 108-113.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0298
Special Issue: 园艺
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhao Xuetong1(), Xu Siqi2(
), Zhang Qi1, Pan Wenzheng1, Shang Haili2, Wang Bin1, Wang Jingxian2, Zhao Rongbiao2
Received:
2020-07-27
Revised:
2020-09-08
Online:
2021-04-15
Published:
2021-04-13
Contact:
Xu Siqi
E-mail:1473699132@qq.com;1033932814@qq.com
CLC Number:
Zhao Xuetong, Xu Siqi, Zhang Qi, Pan Wenzheng, Shang Haili, Wang Bin, Wang Jingxian, Zhao Rongbiao. Effect of Walnut Special Bio-organic-inorganic Compound Fertilizer on Walnut Planting[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 108-113.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0298
处理 | 肥料有机部分来源 | 肥料配方和功能 | 施肥量/(kg/株) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 发酵油枯 (添加功能菌剂) | 16-6-8溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 3 |
2 | 10-5-7溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 5 | |
3 | 20-6-10溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 2.5 | |
4 | 发酵烟梗烟末 (添加功能菌剂) | 16-6-8溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 3 |
5 | 10-5-7溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 5 | |
6 | 20-6-10溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 2.5 | |
7 | 发酵烟梗烟末有机肥 (不添加菌剂) | 16-6-8有机-无机复混肥料 | 3 |
8 | 10-5-7有机-无机复混肥料 | 5 | |
9 | 20-6-10有机-无机复混肥料 | 2.5 | |
10 | 当地常规施肥(CK) | — |
处理 | 肥料有机部分来源 | 肥料配方和功能 | 施肥量/(kg/株) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 发酵油枯 (添加功能菌剂) | 16-6-8溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 3 |
2 | 10-5-7溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 5 | |
3 | 20-6-10溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 2.5 | |
4 | 发酵烟梗烟末 (添加功能菌剂) | 16-6-8溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 3 |
5 | 10-5-7溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 5 | |
6 | 20-6-10溶磷、解钾、促进生长生物-有机-无机复混肥料 | 2.5 | |
7 | 发酵烟梗烟末有机肥 (不添加菌剂) | 16-6-8有机-无机复混肥料 | 3 |
8 | 10-5-7有机-无机复混肥料 | 5 | |
9 | 20-6-10有机-无机复混肥料 | 2.5 | |
10 | 当地常规施肥(CK) | — |
处理 | 细菌 | 真菌 | 放线菌 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 8.29×106 | 1.51×103 | 4.50×105 |
2 | 7.78×106 | 2.25×103 | 3.64×105 |
3 | 6.46×106 | 2.75×103 | 3.88×105 |
4 | 7.81×106 | 1.99×104 | 3.72×105 |
5 | 6.59×106 | 2.34×104 | 3.66×105 |
6 | 5.23×106 | 2.07×104 | 3.21×105 |
7 | 6.96×106 | 3.76×104 | 4.23×105 |
8 | 5.05×106 | 4.11×104 | 3.94×105 |
9 | 4.83×106 | 4.54×104 | 4.01×105 |
10 | 3.57×106 | 6.87×104 | 1.05×105 |
处理 | 细菌 | 真菌 | 放线菌 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 8.29×106 | 1.51×103 | 4.50×105 |
2 | 7.78×106 | 2.25×103 | 3.64×105 |
3 | 6.46×106 | 2.75×103 | 3.88×105 |
4 | 7.81×106 | 1.99×104 | 3.72×105 |
5 | 6.59×106 | 2.34×104 | 3.66×105 |
6 | 5.23×106 | 2.07×104 | 3.21×105 |
7 | 6.96×106 | 3.76×104 | 4.23×105 |
8 | 5.05×106 | 4.11×104 | 3.94×105 |
9 | 4.83×106 | 4.54×104 | 4.01×105 |
10 | 3.57×106 | 6.87×104 | 1.05×105 |
处理 | 菌种 | 菌量/(cfu/g) | 处理 | 菌种 | 菌量/(cfu/g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ht1 | 1.68×106 | 6 | ht1 | 1.15×106 | |
ht2 | 1.57×106 | ht2 | 1.03×106 | |||
ht3 | 1.64×106 | ht3 | 1.21×106 | |||
ht4 | 1.32×106 | ht4 | 1.02×106 | |||
其他 | 2.08×106 | 其他 | 8.2×105 | |||
2 | ht1 | 1.87×106 | 7 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.36×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.54×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.61×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 1.40×106 | 其他 | 1.89×106 | |||
3 | ht1 | 1.57×106 | 8 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.33×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.54×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.32×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 2.27×106 | 其他 | 3.2×105 | |||
4 | ht1 | 1.63×106 | 9 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.58×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.65×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.23×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 1.72×106 | 其他 | 2.5×105 | |||
5 | ht1 | 1.32×106 | 10 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.24×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.52×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.33×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 1.18×106 | 其他 | 3.57×106 |
处理 | 菌种 | 菌量/(cfu/g) | 处理 | 菌种 | 菌量/(cfu/g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ht1 | 1.68×106 | 6 | ht1 | 1.15×106 | |
ht2 | 1.57×106 | ht2 | 1.03×106 | |||
ht3 | 1.64×106 | ht3 | 1.21×106 | |||
ht4 | 1.32×106 | ht4 | 1.02×106 | |||
其他 | 2.08×106 | 其他 | 8.2×105 | |||
2 | ht1 | 1.87×106 | 7 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.36×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.54×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.61×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 1.40×106 | 其他 | 1.89×106 | |||
3 | ht1 | 1.57×106 | 8 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.33×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.54×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.32×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 2.27×106 | 其他 | 3.2×105 | |||
4 | ht1 | 1.63×106 | 9 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.58×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.65×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.23×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 1.72×106 | 其他 | 2.5×105 | |||
5 | ht1 | 1.32×106 | 10 | ht1 | 0 | |
ht2 | 1.24×106 | ht2 | 0 | |||
ht3 | 1.52×106 | ht3 | 0 | |||
ht4 | 1.33×106 | ht4 | 0 | |||
其他 | 1.18×106 | 其他 | 3.57×106 |
处理 | 鲜果重/kg | 鲜壳果重/kg | 干果重/kg | 纵径/mm | 横径/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.86 | 0.67 | 0.349 | 54.72 | 51.24 |
2 | 1.75 | 0.64 | 0.325 | 54.19 | 51.21 |
3 | 1.73 | 0.64 | 0.328 | 54.4 | 50.71 |
4 | 1.93 | 0.71 | 0.373 | 55.61 | 51.37 |
5 | 1.89 | 0.67 | 0.348 | 55.45 | 51.01 |
6 | 1.9 | 0.64 | 0.335 | 55.58 | 51.22 |
7 | 1.82 | 0.65 | 0.341 | 54.05 | 50.97 |
8 | 1.74 | 0.62 | 0.342 | 53.82 | 49.75 |
9 | 1.81 | 0.68 | 0.368 | 53.97 | 50.01 |
10 | 1.88 | 0.64 | 0.309 | 54.11 | 50.56 |
处理 | 鲜果重/kg | 鲜壳果重/kg | 干果重/kg | 纵径/mm | 横径/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.86 | 0.67 | 0.349 | 54.72 | 51.24 |
2 | 1.75 | 0.64 | 0.325 | 54.19 | 51.21 |
3 | 1.73 | 0.64 | 0.328 | 54.4 | 50.71 |
4 | 1.93 | 0.71 | 0.373 | 55.61 | 51.37 |
5 | 1.89 | 0.67 | 0.348 | 55.45 | 51.01 |
6 | 1.9 | 0.64 | 0.335 | 55.58 | 51.22 |
7 | 1.82 | 0.65 | 0.341 | 54.05 | 50.97 |
8 | 1.74 | 0.62 | 0.342 | 53.82 | 49.75 |
9 | 1.81 | 0.68 | 0.368 | 53.97 | 50.01 |
10 | 1.88 | 0.64 | 0.309 | 54.11 | 50.56 |
处理 | 青皮厚/mm | 青皮湿重/kg | 青皮干重/kg |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.2 | 1.19 | 0.181 |
2 | 6.4 | 1.16 | 0.174 |
3 | 5.6 | 1.08 | 0.171 |
4 | 6.5 | 1.24 | 0.184 |
5 | 6.7 | 1.19 | 0.181 |
6 | 7.1 | 1.24 | 0.18 |
7 | 6.3 | 1.15 | 0.187 |
8 | 6.7 | 1.09 | 0.173 |
9 | 6.4 | 1.16 | 0.176 |
10 | 5.8 | 1.24 | 0.199 |
处理 | 青皮厚/mm | 青皮湿重/kg | 青皮干重/kg |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.2 | 1.19 | 0.181 |
2 | 6.4 | 1.16 | 0.174 |
3 | 5.6 | 1.08 | 0.171 |
4 | 6.5 | 1.24 | 0.184 |
5 | 6.7 | 1.19 | 0.181 |
6 | 7.1 | 1.24 | 0.18 |
7 | 6.3 | 1.15 | 0.187 |
8 | 6.7 | 1.09 | 0.173 |
9 | 6.4 | 1.16 | 0.176 |
10 | 5.8 | 1.24 | 0.199 |
[1] | 郗荣庭, 张毅萍. 中国果树志·核桃卷[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1996. |
[2] | Janick J, James N M. Fruit breeding. Volume Ⅲ[M]. New York: John Wiley & SonsInc, 1996: 241. |
[3] | 裴东, 鲁新政. 中国核桃种质资源[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2011. |
[4] | 邓金龙. 我国核桃生产现状及发展策略[J]. 林产工业, 2016,43(10):56. |
[5] | 路安民. 论胡桃科植物的地理分布[J]. 植物分类学报, 1982,20(3):257-274. |
[6] | 张利波, 刘晓海, 彭金辉, 等. 微波加热核桃壳制取活性炭及孔结构表征[J]. 能源化工, 2006,27(4):18-22 . |
[7] | 赵阳, 高建明, 郝新敏, 等. 基于KOH活化法的核桃壳基活性炭制备及其表征[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2016,16(2):262-266. |
[8] | 余筱洁, 周存山, 王允祥, 等. 山核桃壳活性炭制备及其吸附苯胺特性[J] . 过程工程学报, 2010,10(1):65-69 . |
[9] | 王力臻, 闻红丽, 孙淑敏, 等. 以核桃壳为碳源微波加热制备介孔活性炭[J]. 功能材料, 2014,45(18):18144-18147 . |
[10] | 任丽娟, 潘毅, 赵多勇. 核桃青皮提取物的生物特性及医学应用的研究进展[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019,6(57):192-193. |
[11] | 王雪梅, 苗世童. 羊毛纤维应用核桃青皮色素草木染色工艺研究[J]. 染整技术, 2018,40(4):28-30. |
[12] | 李瑞, 刘云, 阑欢郝, 等. 云南17种核桃仁主要营养成分测定及脂肪酸研究[J]. 包装工程, 2019,40(7):19-25. |
[13] | 中国预防医学科学院营养与食品卫生研究所. 食物营养成分表(全国代表值)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1991. |
[14] | 毛琳璐, 李冰, 张霞, 等. 核桃油与棕榈硬脂复配体系在涂抹脂基料油中的应用[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2020,28(2):7-13. |
[15] | 王根宪, 核桃无公害高效专用肥研究与应用[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2011,27(7):29-30,59. |
[16] | 国家标准局. GB 7907—87核桃丰产与坚果品质[S]. |
[17] | 陈立群, 牟秉喜, 龙人海, 等. 南方良种核桃早期丰产栽培技术[J]. 中国南方果树, 2002,31(3):6. |
[18] | 邹伟烈, 习学良, 范志远, 等. 薄壳山核桃引种云南弥渡的表现及栽培技术要点[J]. 中国南方果树, 2010,39(3):61-64. |
[19] | 铁学江, 唐永奉, 刘世平, 等. 一种酵菌素核桃专用生物有机肥肥效试验[J]. 中国林副特产, 2018(6):45-46. |
[20] | 方立军, 余正文, 李孝鑫, 等. 核桃专用肥对核桃生长、结果及抗性的影响[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2016,45(2):31-33. |
[21] | 章家恩, 蔡燕飞, 高爱霞, 等. 土壤微生物多样性实验研究方法概述[J]. 土壤, 2004,36(4):346-350. |
[22] | Chinheya C C, Yobo K S, Laing M D. Biological control of the rootknot nematode,Meloidogyne javanica,(Chitwood) using Bacillus isolates, on soybean[J]. Biological Control, 2017,109. |
[23] | 张迎春, 颉建明, 李静, 等. 生物有机肥部分替代化肥对莴笋及土壤理化性质和微生物的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(4):196-205. |
[24] | 张博勇, 刘杜玲, 彭少兵, 等. 配方施肥对早实核桃品种辽核4号蛋白质和脂肪含量影响的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018,33(4):120-123,260. |
[25] | 刘杜玲, 张博勇, 彭少兵, 等. 氮磷钾配方施肥对核桃产量和品质指标的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018,33(6):113-117. |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[3] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[4] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[5] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[6] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[7] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[8] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[9] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[10] | SHEN Jicheng, ZHAO Caixia, YE Fahui, LI Yaxin, LIU Demei, LIU Ruijuan, SHEN Yuhu, ZHANG Huaigang, CHEN Wenjie. Analysis of Germplasm Differentiation of Ledu Long Pepper Based on Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 29-34. |
[11] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[12] | LIU Xiaohang, MA Shuqing, ZHAO Jing, QUAN Hujie, DENG Kuicai, CHAI Qingrong. Yield Response of Japonica Rice of Northeast China to Low Temperature in Different Time Periods of Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 91-98. |
[13] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
[14] | NIU Liya, WANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, WANG Zhi, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Wei, YU Liang. Wheat Quality and Yield Traits: Effects on Scores of Steamed Bread and Noodles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 129-133. |
[15] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHOU Miaoping, ZHANG Peng. Analysis of Yield and Its Components of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 15-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||