Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (15): 55-62.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0408
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Zimo(), Lin Shijie, Zhang Dawei, He Huaijiang, Chen Siyu, Bao Guangdao, Jia Qingbin, Zhang Zhonghui()
Received:
2020-08-26
Revised:
2020-10-26
Online:
2021-05-25
Published:
2021-05-18
Contact:
Zhang Zhonghui
E-mail:wzm100214@163.com;zzhgiszzh@163.com
CLC Number:
Wang Zimo, Lin Shijie, Zhang Dawei, He Huaijiang, Chen Siyu, Bao Guangdao, Jia Qingbin, Zhang Zhonghui. Soil Improvement Effect of Five Different Typical Forests in Saline-alkali Soil in Western Jilin Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(15): 55-62.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0408
样地 | 土层/cm | 土壤容重/(g/cm3) | 总孔隙度/% | 毛管孔隙度/% | 非毛管孔隙度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
柽柳 | 0~10 | 1.51±0.02e | 43.02±0.62e | 28.09±1.81d | 14.93±1.79bc |
10~20 | 1.53±0.05c | 42.32±1.91c | 27.91±1.10d | 14.41±2.00ab | |
20~30 | 1.62±0.02c | 38.87±0.80c | 26.68±1.04b | 12.19±1.34a | |
枸杞 | 0~10 | 1.52±0.01e | 42.54±0.15de | 25.56±0.94bc | 15.98±1.21c |
10~20 | 1.57±0.02b | 40.86±0.63b | 26.41±1.12c | 14.45±0.98ab | |
20~30 | 1.60±0.02c | 39.53±0.69c | 24.99±1.09bc | 14.54±1.40cd | |
黑杨 | 0~10 | 1.55±0.05bc | 41.51±0.60bc | 27.58±1.31cd | 13.93±1.66ab |
10~20 | 1.52±0.02c | 42.64±0.86c | 28.32±0.99d | 14.32±0.94a | |
20~30 | 1.64±0.03b | 38.11±1.05b | 23.06±1.54cd | 15.05±1.93d | |
黑杨白榆混交林 | 0~10 | 1.57±0.03b | 40.66±0.27b | 26.14±1.25ab | 14.52±1.76ab |
10~20 | 1.56±0.06b | 40.93±0.76b | 25.07±1.15ab | 15.86±1.40c | |
20~30 | 1.61±0.02c | 39.19±0.77c | 23.55±0.75b | 15.64±1.33d | |
油松 | 0~10 | 1.54±0.02cd | 41.81±0.25cd | 26.91±1.20b | 14.90±1.51bc |
10~20 | 1.57±0.02b | 40.82±0.60b | 25.17±1.47bc | 15.65±1.40bc | |
20~30 | 1.61±0.02c | 39.26±0.76c | 26.33±1.12ab | 12.93±1.33cd | |
裸地 | 0~10 | 1.62±0.02a | 38.78±0.16a | 25.44±0.85a | 13.34±1.22a |
10~20 | 1.64±0.03a | 38.04±1.13a | 24.15±1.09a | 13.90±1.74a | |
20~30 | 1.66±0.01a | 37.32±0.55a | 23.70±1.07a | 13.62±1.37bc |
样地 | 土层/cm | 土壤容重/(g/cm3) | 总孔隙度/% | 毛管孔隙度/% | 非毛管孔隙度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
柽柳 | 0~10 | 1.51±0.02e | 43.02±0.62e | 28.09±1.81d | 14.93±1.79bc |
10~20 | 1.53±0.05c | 42.32±1.91c | 27.91±1.10d | 14.41±2.00ab | |
20~30 | 1.62±0.02c | 38.87±0.80c | 26.68±1.04b | 12.19±1.34a | |
枸杞 | 0~10 | 1.52±0.01e | 42.54±0.15de | 25.56±0.94bc | 15.98±1.21c |
10~20 | 1.57±0.02b | 40.86±0.63b | 26.41±1.12c | 14.45±0.98ab | |
20~30 | 1.60±0.02c | 39.53±0.69c | 24.99±1.09bc | 14.54±1.40cd | |
黑杨 | 0~10 | 1.55±0.05bc | 41.51±0.60bc | 27.58±1.31cd | 13.93±1.66ab |
10~20 | 1.52±0.02c | 42.64±0.86c | 28.32±0.99d | 14.32±0.94a | |
20~30 | 1.64±0.03b | 38.11±1.05b | 23.06±1.54cd | 15.05±1.93d | |
黑杨白榆混交林 | 0~10 | 1.57±0.03b | 40.66±0.27b | 26.14±1.25ab | 14.52±1.76ab |
10~20 | 1.56±0.06b | 40.93±0.76b | 25.07±1.15ab | 15.86±1.40c | |
20~30 | 1.61±0.02c | 39.19±0.77c | 23.55±0.75b | 15.64±1.33d | |
油松 | 0~10 | 1.54±0.02cd | 41.81±0.25cd | 26.91±1.20b | 14.90±1.51bc |
10~20 | 1.57±0.02b | 40.82±0.60b | 25.17±1.47bc | 15.65±1.40bc | |
20~30 | 1.61±0.02c | 39.26±0.76c | 26.33±1.12ab | 12.93±1.33cd | |
裸地 | 0~10 | 1.62±0.02a | 38.78±0.16a | 25.44±0.85a | 13.34±1.22a |
10~20 | 1.64±0.03a | 38.04±1.13a | 24.15±1.09a | 13.90±1.74a | |
20~30 | 1.66±0.01a | 37.32±0.55a | 23.70±1.07a | 13.62±1.37bc |
样地 | 初渗速率/(mm/min) | 稳定速率/(mm/min) | 平均渗透速率/(mm/min) | 到稳渗透速率时间/min |
---|---|---|---|---|
柽柳 | 8.64±0.10f | 3.12±0.08d | 3.95±0.12e | 28 |
枸杞 | 8.27±0.01e | 3.05±9.12d | 3.73±0.09d | 30 |
杨树 | 7.69±0.09d | 2.34±0.07c | 3.19±0.07c | 32 |
杨树白榆混交林 | 7.05±0.11c | 2.13±0.11b | 2.83±0.09b | 30 |
油松 | 7.18±0.06b | 2.17±0.09b | 2.93±0.09b | 34 |
裸地 | 5.85±0.09a | 2.02±0.14a | 2.54±0.06a | 42 |
样地 | 初渗速率/(mm/min) | 稳定速率/(mm/min) | 平均渗透速率/(mm/min) | 到稳渗透速率时间/min |
---|---|---|---|---|
柽柳 | 8.64±0.10f | 3.12±0.08d | 3.95±0.12e | 28 |
枸杞 | 8.27±0.01e | 3.05±9.12d | 3.73±0.09d | 30 |
杨树 | 7.69±0.09d | 2.34±0.07c | 3.19±0.07c | 32 |
杨树白榆混交林 | 7.05±0.11c | 2.13±0.11b | 2.83±0.09b | 30 |
油松 | 7.18±0.06b | 2.17±0.09b | 2.93±0.09b | 34 |
裸地 | 5.85±0.09a | 2.02±0.14a | 2.54±0.06a | 42 |
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
X2 | -0.999** | 1 | ||||||||||||
X3 | -0.614** | 0.620** | 1 | |||||||||||
X4 | -0.409** | 0.404** | -0.468** | 1 | ||||||||||
X5 | -0.655** | 0.660** | 0.498** | 0.162 | 1 | |||||||||
X6 | -0.302* | 0.307* | 0.277* | 0.023 | 0.880** | 1 | ||||||||
X7 | -0.830** | 0.831** | 0.593** | 0.244 | 0.794** | 0.508** | 1 | |||||||
X8 | -0.687** | 0.688** | 0.073 | 0.296* | 0.351** | 0.007 | 0.685** | 1 | ||||||
X9 | -0.437** | 0.435** | 0.096 | 0.166 | -0.006 | -0.198 | 0.477** | 0.582** | 1 | |||||
X10 | -0.605** | 0.610** | 0.599** | -0.12 | 0.354** | 0.180 | 0.621** | 0.435** | 0.778** | 1 | ||||
X11 | -0.545** | 0.545** | 0.420** | 0.124 | 0.418** | 0.261 | 0.687** | 0.532** | 0.769** | 0.771* | 1 | |||
X12 | -0.622** | 0.621** | 0.336* | 0.307* | 0.454** | 0.272* | 0.712** | 0.569** | 0.690** | 0.698** | 0.779** | 1 | ||
X13 | -0.686** | 0.681** | 0.245 | 0.482** | 0.631** | 0.337* | 0.714** | 0.667** | 0.217 | 0.163 | 0.431** | 0.461** | 1 | |
X14 | 0.558** | -0.551** | -0.81 | -0.526** | -0.381** | -0.148 | -0.695** | -0.741** | -0.614* | -0.343* | -0.639** | -0.679** | -0.742** | 1 |
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
X2 | -0.999** | 1 | ||||||||||||
X3 | -0.614** | 0.620** | 1 | |||||||||||
X4 | -0.409** | 0.404** | -0.468** | 1 | ||||||||||
X5 | -0.655** | 0.660** | 0.498** | 0.162 | 1 | |||||||||
X6 | -0.302* | 0.307* | 0.277* | 0.023 | 0.880** | 1 | ||||||||
X7 | -0.830** | 0.831** | 0.593** | 0.244 | 0.794** | 0.508** | 1 | |||||||
X8 | -0.687** | 0.688** | 0.073 | 0.296* | 0.351** | 0.007 | 0.685** | 1 | ||||||
X9 | -0.437** | 0.435** | 0.096 | 0.166 | -0.006 | -0.198 | 0.477** | 0.582** | 1 | |||||
X10 | -0.605** | 0.610** | 0.599** | -0.12 | 0.354** | 0.180 | 0.621** | 0.435** | 0.778** | 1 | ||||
X11 | -0.545** | 0.545** | 0.420** | 0.124 | 0.418** | 0.261 | 0.687** | 0.532** | 0.769** | 0.771* | 1 | |||
X12 | -0.622** | 0.621** | 0.336* | 0.307* | 0.454** | 0.272* | 0.712** | 0.569** | 0.690** | 0.698** | 0.779** | 1 | ||
X13 | -0.686** | 0.681** | 0.245 | 0.482** | 0.631** | 0.337* | 0.714** | 0.667** | 0.217 | 0.163 | 0.431** | 0.461** | 1 | |
X14 | 0.558** | -0.551** | -0.81 | -0.526** | -0.381** | -0.148 | -0.695** | -0.741** | -0.614* | -0.343* | -0.639** | -0.679** | -0.742** | 1 |
项目 | 第一主成分 | 第二主成分 | 第三主成分 |
---|---|---|---|
X1 | -0.896 | -0.118 | 0.054 |
X2 | 0.896 | 0.124 | -0.046 |
X3 | 0.571 | 0.309 | 0.651 |
X4 | 0.702 | 0.680 | -0.072 |
X5 | 0.344 | -0.221 | -0.811 |
X6 | 0.937 | 0.193 | 0.009 |
X7 | 0.398 | 0.772 | -0.025 |
X8 | 0.639 | -0.678 | 0.265 |
X9 | 0.778 | -0.247 | -0.128 |
X10 | 0.722 | -0.218 | 0.533 |
X11 | 0.795 | -0.253 | 0.248 |
X12 | 0.739 | 0.163 | -0.483 |
X13 | 0.820 | -0.229 | 0.066 |
X14 | -0.766 | 0.301 | 0.392 |
项目 | 第一主成分 | 第二主成分 | 第三主成分 |
---|---|---|---|
X1 | -0.896 | -0.118 | 0.054 |
X2 | 0.896 | 0.124 | -0.046 |
X3 | 0.571 | 0.309 | 0.651 |
X4 | 0.702 | 0.680 | -0.072 |
X5 | 0.344 | -0.221 | -0.811 |
X6 | 0.937 | 0.193 | 0.009 |
X7 | 0.398 | 0.772 | -0.025 |
X8 | 0.639 | -0.678 | 0.265 |
X9 | 0.778 | -0.247 | -0.128 |
X10 | 0.722 | -0.218 | 0.533 |
X11 | 0.795 | -0.253 | 0.248 |
X12 | 0.739 | 0.163 | -0.483 |
X13 | 0.820 | -0.229 | 0.066 |
X14 | -0.766 | 0.301 | 0.392 |
林分类型 | 公因子得分 | 综合分值 | 排序 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | |||
CL | 61.970 | 1.539 | -0.28 | 40.79 | 2 |
GQ | 67.482 | -2.009 | 0.007 | 43.81 | 1 |
HY | 59.871 | -0.588 | 1.406 | 39.31 | 4 |
BY | 61.747 | 1.443 | -2.067 | 40.33 | 3 |
YS | 59.183 | 1.960 | -0.353 | 39.03 | 5 |
CK | 49.600 | 5.448 | 0.656 | 33.55 | 6 |
林分类型 | 公因子得分 | 综合分值 | 排序 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | |||
CL | 61.970 | 1.539 | -0.28 | 40.79 | 2 |
GQ | 67.482 | -2.009 | 0.007 | 43.81 | 1 |
HY | 59.871 | -0.588 | 1.406 | 39.31 | 4 |
BY | 61.747 | 1.443 | -2.067 | 40.33 | 3 |
YS | 59.183 | 1.960 | -0.353 | 39.03 | 5 |
CK | 49.600 | 5.448 | 0.656 | 33.55 | 6 |
[1] | 潘洁, 王立艳, 肖辉, 等. 滨海盐碱地不同耐盐草本植物土壤养分动态变化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(18):168-172. |
[2] | 侯贺贺. 黄河三角洲盐碱地生物措施改良效果研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014. |
[3] | 董海凤. 黄河三角洲长期人工林地土壤特征与改良[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014. |
[4] | 关胜超. 松嫩平原盐碱地改良利用研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所), 2017. |
[5] | 许永德. 北方平原地区盐碱地改良利用研究[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2018(05):91-92,177. |
[6] | 刘彩虹. 吉林西部苏打盐渍土区土壤水氮空间分布特征及行为模拟[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2016. |
[7] | 许晓鸿, 刘肃, 赵英杰, 等. 吉林省西部不同环境因子对苏打盐碱地分布的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018,38(01):89-95. |
[8] | 陈苗苗. 不同树种对黄河三角洲滨海盐碱地的土壤改良效应评价[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2017. |
[9] | 邓丞. 天津滨海盐碱地沿海防护林配置模式及构建技术的研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2014. |
[10] | 张永民, 钟林生. 松嫩平原典型盐碱化地区土地利用格局变化研究——以吉林省乾安县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008(09):124-128. |
[11] | 曹云, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 森林生态系统的水文调节功能及生态学机制研究进展[J]. 生态环境报, 2006,15(6):360-365. |
[12] | 冯楷斌, 张暘暘, 郭敬丽. 冀北山地不同类型白桦林枯落物及土壤持水性能研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016,4(2):74-80. |
[13] | 吕刚, 翟景轩, 李叶鑫, 等. 辽西北风沙地不同植物群落土壤入渗特性[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018,36(04):133-139. |
[14] | 汪欣, 向兆, 李策, 等. 全自动凯氏定氮仪测定土壤全氮含量方法的优化探索[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2020,51(03):438-440,446. |
[15] | 赵名彦. 滨海盐碱地造林技术与效果研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2011. |
[16] | 王璐, 仲启铖, 陆颖, 等. 群落配置对滨海围垦区土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2014,51(03):638-647. |
[17] | 任蔓莉, 魏晨辉, 裴忠雪, 等. 松嫩平原沙土区不同植被类型对土壤相关指标的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2015,35(05):765-771. |
[18] | 于大炮. 辽西地区生态经济型水土保持林效益评价及模式研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2001. |
[19] | 魏平. 柿砧木耐盐抗旱及嫁接亲和性研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2017. |
[20] | 邱月. 渤海泥质海岸典型防护林对土壤主要性状的影响[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2018. |
[21] | 宋雪. 黄河三角洲盐碱地混交林对土壤的改良[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2012. |
[22] | 张平. 不同造林树种对盐碱地土壤理化性质的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014. |
[23] | 陈苗苗, 刘桂民, 刘德玺, 等. 不同人工林对黄河三角洲滨海盐碱地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017,24(06):41-44. |
[24] | 王丽琴. 滨海盐碱地不同造林模式对土壤理化性质及水盐运动的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014 |
[25] | 刘桂民, 陈苗苗, 李长贵, 等. 基于因子分析的盐碱地人工林土壤改良效应评价——以黄河三角洲为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(28):50-54. |
[26] | 刘艳. 枸杞对晋北重度盐碱地改良效果研究[D]. 晋中:山西农业大学, 2016. |
[1] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[2] | ZENG Jie, YU Lang, DABU Xilatu, LI Yunju. Effects of Phosphorus-based Soil Conditioner on Growth of Chinese Cabbage in Low-phosphorus Red Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 81-87. |
[3] | WANG Lina, YANG Ying, Du Su. Effects of Biochar Application on Saline-alkali Soil: Research Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 81-87. |
[4] | HAN Xiaofang, TIAN Xiaoming, YANG Yongli, ZHANG Jingzhi, ZHANG Qing, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Tao, JIA Lin. Two Soil Compound Amendments: Improvement and Fertility Effect on Coastal Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 54-59. |
[5] | LIU Cuilan, WANG Kaifang, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, LI Shanwen, WANG Fang, REN Fei, WANG Yinhua. Responses of Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Fraxinus Clones to Coastal Saline-Alkaline Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 7-16. |
[6] | YU Zhonghao, ZHOU Wei, LI Zhigang, LI Ziwen, JIA Juanxia, ZHOU Yaxing. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Traits of Soybean in Inner Mongolia from 2002 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 14-21. |
[7] | LU Mengyao, LIU Dehu, LU Xueli, LIANG Heng, SUN Yuanyuan, LIU Yalin, SONG Tingqiang, FAN Haisheng. Construction of Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Analysis in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 119-127. |
[8] | LIU Qi, GAO Zhiqiang, YANG Zhenping, QIAO Yuejing. Rational Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates Improving the Bacterial Community Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Winter Wheat Tillage Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 77-84. |
[9] | LUO Wei, ZHOU Wei, WANG Zhenguo, LI Yan, YU Wenhao, YANG Zhiqiang, YU Zhonghao, LI Ziwen, ZHOU Yaxing. Twenty-four Sweet Sorghum Materials: Comprehensive Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits and Biological Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 21-28. |
[10] | ZHAO Lijuan, ZHI Jiazeng, ZHANG Jianchun, DU Hao, ZHOU Jinsong, LIU Xuemin, ZHANG Rongqin. Diversity Analysis of Leaf Phenotypic Characters of Musa spp. Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 56-64. |
[11] | WANG Zhiqiang, DU Huiying, LI Cheng, GUO Song, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, YU Rong. Genetic Distance and Heterosis of Quantitative Characters of Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 47-51. |
[12] | LUO Yulan, ZHANG Guobing, ZHANG Dongmei. Study on Cultivar Classification of Wisteria According Morphological Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 52-59. |
[13] | LIU Zifan, SU Bimeng, HUANG Jie, WEI Yunxia, XIAO Zili. Effects of Cassava-Peanut Intercropping Patterns on Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 102-107. |
[14] | YAO Xiaojian, ZHANG Xiongjian, YAO Zhufang, LUO Zhongxia, WANG Zhangying, HUANG Lifei, FANG Boping, YANG Yiling. Potted Conservation Substrates of Sweet Potato Germplasms: Screening and Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 28-37. |
[15] | ZHANG Mengfei, LI Shuang, LI Yunsheng, MA Haixia, LIU Yueqiu. Evaluation on the Drought Resistance of Seedlings of Nine Greening Tree Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 38-46. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||