Influence of Different Substrate Proportions on the Growth and Physiology of C.companulata ‘Youkou’ Seedlings in Containers

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0698

Abstract

Abstract:

To screen out the best substrate proportion which is suitable for the growth of C.companulata ‘Youkou’ container seedlings and improve the growth quality of Guiyang cherry blossom transplant container seedlings, peat, perlite, vermiculite, and yellow clay were used as the raw materials, and 4 mixed substrates were configured in certain proportions. The experiment set the yellow soil as the control, a 35 cm × 35 cm× 30 cm non-woven bag was selected as the seedling container, and the annual C.companulata ‘Youkou’ grafted seedlings introduced to Guiyang were tested to determine the physical and chemical properties of the soil, and the growth and physiological response of C.companulata ‘Youkou’ to different substrate proportions, and the correlations of the measurement indicators were analyzed. The results show that the mixed substrate has a smaller soil bulk density, greater porosity and strong sustainability of soil nutrients than the yellow soil, which is conducive to the plant seedling height, ground diameter and the accumulation of biomass; the mixed substrate could promote the formation of photosynthetic pigments in C.companulata ‘Youkou’, enhance photosynthetic efficiency and promote the accumulation of photosynthetic products, the physiological indicators are better than those of the yellow soil control. Correlation analysis shows that there is a strong correlation between the seedling height, ground diameter, biomass, chlorophyll content, actual light quanta, soluble sugar and soluble protein of the C.companulata ‘Youkou’. The experiment shows that T4 (peat soil: vermiculite: perlite: yellow soil=3:2:1:1) is the best substrate proportion for the cultivation of C.companulata ‘Youkou’ container seedlings introduced to Guiyang.

Key words: substrate proportions, C.companulata ‘Youkou’, growth condition, physiological response, container seedling

CLC Number:

S723.1+33

Yu Han, Ou Jing, Yang Xiaoyan, Zhang Fengquan. Influence of Different Substrate Proportions on the Growth and Physiology of C.companulata ‘Youkou’ Seedlings in Containers[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(29): 47-55.

Figures/Tables 10

References 28

[1]	袁冬明, 严春风, 赵绮. 樱花[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2018:107-181.
[2]	胡睦荫, 蔡庭付, 吴夏华, 等. 工厂化容器育苗研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007(14):4099-4100.
[3]	刘思春, 吕家珑, 马爱生, 等. 有机质对黄墡土持水性与水肥效应的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005(3):65-68.
[4]	辛琨, 赵广孺, 孙娟, 等. 红树林土壤吸附重金属生态功能价值估算——以海南省东寨港红树林为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005(2):206-208.
[5]	周震峰, 徐良. 生物炭对土壤吸附邻苯二甲酸二乙酯的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(9):5267-5274.
[6]	陈阳, 林永胜, 周先治. 辣椒穴盘育苗基质对辣椒幼苗生长的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2015, 30(2):150-156.
[7]	陈香波, 申瑞雪, 吕秀立, 等. 不同基质栽培百子莲生长效应评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(19):73-79.
[8]	张衡锋, 韦庆翠, 汤庚国, 等. 不同基质配比对黑果腺肋花楸容器苗生长及叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(20):104-109.
[9]	郑珂媛, 康璐, 郭梦晴, 等. 不同基质配比对大果木莲容器苗生长的影响[J]. 南方林业科学, 2018, 46(6):12-16.
[10]	卫星, 李贵雨, 吕琳. 农林废弃物育苗基质的保水保肥效应[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(12):26-34.
[11]	王慧娟, 孟月娥, 王利民, 等. 基质配方和容器对红叶樱花容器苗生长的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(8):106-109.
[12]	吴擢城. 不同基质配方对钟花樱容器苗质量的影响[J]. 福建林业, 2019(5): 35,36-40.
[13]	邹军. 福建山樱花生物学特性及其轻基质网袋容器苗生产技术[J]. 福建农业科技, 2012(6):69-70.
[14]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:19-65.
[15]	秦爱丽, 郭泉水, 简尊吉, 等. 不同育苗基质对圃地崖柏出苗率和苗木生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(9):9-17.
[16]	樊金娟, 阮燕晔. 植物生理学实验教程第2版[M]. 中国农业大学出版社: 2015:59-117.
[17]	胡小京, 曾燕颖, 敖飞雄, 等. 不同栽培基质对两种石斛生长及生理的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 44(11):29-35.
[18]	张莹莹, 孙周平, 刘广晶, 等. 根区通气方式对番茄根际气体环境及基质理化性质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20(4):106-110.
[19]	季托, 焦娟, 吴金娟, 等. 茄子穴盘育苗基质适宜理化性状研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 49(4):566-571.
[20]	张杰, 黄军华, 顾海燕, 等. 不同基质对盆栽杜鹃花生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(34):116-119.
[21]	武捷, 张健唯, 安烁宇, 等. 基质配方对酸柚苗生物量及矿质元素含量的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(1):161-166.
[22]	徐苏萌, 高艳明, 马晓燕, 等. 不同有机肥配比对设施番茄生长、品质和基质环境的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2016, 32(1):189-195.
[23]	梁琼月, 董蒙蒙, 何冰, 等. 朱砂叶螨危害对木薯幼苗光合作用及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(9):89-93.
[24]	谢彦如, 唐丹, 张蒲, 等. 不同基质配比对辣椒穴盘苗生长的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(4):7-14.
[25]	刘落鱼, 潘澜, 侯晓丽, 等. 两种基质对三种室内垂直绿化植物叶片养分含量和叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2018, 45(7):40-47.
[26]	翟孟圆, 黄金刚, 李宝庆, 等. 不同栽培基质对设施樱桃番茄生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(11):39-42,97.
[27]	吕英忠, 王新平, 李小平. 不同基质对控根容器下苹果大苗生长和光合作用的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(6):47-52.
[28]	王辉, 孙耀清, 杨乐, 等. 3种茶花叶片可溶性糖与可溶性蛋白含量的年变化[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(11):105-107.

编号	基质成分及配比（体积比）
T1(CK)	黄泥土
T2	泥炭土:蛭石:黄泥土=2:1:1
T3	泥炭土:蛭石:珍珠岩:黄泥土=1:1:1:1
T4	泥炭土:蛭石:珍珠岩:黄泥土=3:2:1:1
T5	泥炭土:黄泥土=1:1

编号	基质成分及配比（体积比）
T1(CK)	黄泥土
T2	泥炭土:蛭石:黄泥土=2:1:1
T3	泥炭土:蛭石:珍珠岩:黄泥土=1:1:1:1
T4	泥炭土:蛭石:珍珠岩:黄泥土=3:2:1:1
T5	泥炭土:黄泥土=1:1

处理	土壤容重/(g/cm³)	总孔隙度/%	通气孔隙度/%	持水孔隙度/%	毛管孔隙/%	大小孔隙比
T1	1.18±0.08Aa	28.6±2.00Ee	4.07±2.00Cc	24.53±2.00De	43.9±2.00Ee	1:6.03
T2	0.41±0.05Cc	71.47±2.00ABb	6.31±2.00ABb	65.16±1.00Ab	65.16±2.00Bb	1:10.33
T3	0.46±0.13Cc	67.34±3.00Cbc	6.58±2.00ABab	60.76±2.00Bc	60.76±1.00Cc	1:9.23
T4	0.24±0.09Dd	75.98±2.00Aa	6.97±2.00Aa	68.53±2.00Aa	69.01±2.00Aa	1:9.83
T5	0.691±0.09Bb	63.37±2.00CDd	6.07±2.00ABb	57.3±2.00BCd	57.3±1.00Dd	1:9.44

处理	土壤容重/(g/cm³)	总孔隙度/%	通气孔隙度/%	持水孔隙度/%	毛管孔隙/%	大小孔隙比
T1	1.18±0.08Aa	28.6±2.00Ee	4.07±2.00Cc	24.53±2.00De	43.9±2.00Ee	1:6.03
T2	0.41±0.05Cc	71.47±2.00ABb	6.31±2.00ABb	65.16±1.00Ab	65.16±2.00Bb	1:10.33
T3	0.46±0.13Cc	67.34±3.00Cbc	6.58±2.00ABab	60.76±2.00Bc	60.76±1.00Cc	1:9.23
T4	0.24±0.09Dd	75.98±2.00Aa	6.97±2.00Aa	68.53±2.00Aa	69.01±2.00Aa	1:9.83
T5	0.691±0.09Bb	63.37±2.00CDd	6.07±2.00ABb	57.3±2.00BCd	57.3±1.00Dd	1:9.44

处理	pH	有机质/(g/kg)	全氮/(g/kg)	全磷/(g/kg)	全钾/(g/kg)	碱解氮/(g/kg)	速效磷/(g/kg)	速效钾/(g/kg)
T1	4.84	27.38	1.10	0.31	9.33	33.67	2.48	120.91
T2	5.49	185.09	2.47	0.62	21.41	196.00	8.54	300.00
T3	5.31	88.61	1.56	0.42	24.06	161.60	3.82	282.00
T4	5.61	188.57	2.67	0.50	21.70	247.20	11.39	362.00
T5	5.13	130.04	2.18	0.42	20.26	179.20	4.68	231.00