Predatory Functional Response of Hippodamia variegata to Myzus persicae

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0586

Abstract

Abstract:

This study aimed to clarify the biological control potential of Hippodamia variegata against Myzus persicae. Different density treatments of H. variegata (predator) and M. persicae (prey) were set up. Under controlled artificial climate conditions [temperature (26±1℃), photoperiod (L:D=14:10), relative humidity (70%±5%)], the predatory functional response, searching efficiency, and interference response of H. variegata to M. persicae were determined in the laboratory using the Holling-II model equation. The functional responses of H. variegata (including larvae at all instars and adults) to M. persicae all conformed to the Holling-II model. The predation rate of H. variegata increased with increasing prey density. The theoretical maximum daily predation capacity of H. variegata on M. persicae differed among developmental stages, in the following descending order: 4th instar larvae (184.81 individuals), female adults (176.01 individuals), male adults (151.35 individuals), 3^rd instar larvae (120.68 individuals), 2^nd instar larvae (38.00 individuals), and 1^st instar larvae (16.29 individuals). The 4^thinstar larvae exhibited the strongest instantaneous attack rate (a′ = 1.5790) on M. persicae, while the 1^st instar larvae showed the weakest (a′ = 0.5077). For all developmental stages of H. variegata, the searching efficiency on M. persicae decreased with increasing prey density, with the 4^th instar larvae demonstrating the strongest searching effect. The predation of M. persicae by H. variegata (across all stages) was significantly affected by the predator’s own density and intraspecific interference. Under a fixed prey density, as the predator density increased, the self-density interference coefficient increased with the advancement of H. variegata’s developmental stage. The interference coefficients of different stages were ranked as follows: male adults (0.597) > 4^th instar larvae (0.535) > female adults (0.507) > 3^rd instar larvae (0.444) > 2^nd instar larvae (0.398) > 1^st instar larvae (0.290). As a dominant natural enemy insect resource in Xinjiang, H. variegata exhibits excellent predation ability and pest control potential. This study provides a theoretical basis for evaluating the effective application of H. variegata in the practical control of M. persicae.

Key words: Hippodamia variegata, Myzus persicae, predatory capacity, interference response, biological control

TUERHONG Gulinuer, TIAN Guo, YANG Qingchuan, YE Tingyu, YANG Minglu. Predatory Functional Response of Hippodamia variegata to Myzus persicae[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(33): 139-145.

Figures/Tables 6

References 33

[1]	崔巍平, 陈俊科, 李欣. 新疆辣椒产业发展现状及对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(13):195-197,201.
[2]	顾兴波, 周潇, 李春丽, 等. 植物源农药对以雪茄烟为寄主的烟蚜防效果及对烟蚜茧蜂安全性评价试验[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(21):120-125. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0733
[3]	程格格, 咸文荣, 刘雲祥, 等. 不同杀虫剂对设施辣椒桃蚜的防效分析[J]. 植物医学, 2025, 4(3):61-66.
[4]	赵战马, 徐晞晟, 池委洪, 等. 设施栽培条件下异色瓢虫对辣椒桃蚜防控效果研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(11):2734-2737. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221172
[5]	李明桃. 桃蚜的生物学特性与防治措施[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2013, 3(Z1):1-4.
[6]	张浩, 王金彦, 陈义娟, 等. 温度对不同虫态异色瓢虫捕食桃蚜功能反应的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2023, 39(4):90-95.
[7]	党雯雯, 刘冰, 褚栋, 等. 新疆棉田蓟马的捕食性天敌优势种类筛选与控害功能评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(17):3347-3357. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.17.009
[8]	色晨晨, 张涛, 戴长春, 等. 低浓度吡虫啉削弱多异瓢虫对棉花植株挥发物的嗅觉识别功能[J]. 昆虫学报, 2024, 67(2):193-202.
[9]	姜岩, 修春丽, 王冬梅, 等. 多异瓢虫生物生态学特性及保育利用研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(1):50-62. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.07.020
[10]	宋双, 姜彩鸽, 赵亚楠, 等. 多异瓢虫对葡萄斑叶蝉的捕食作用[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2019(4):41-44.
[11]	王巧, 杨龙, 潘云飞, 等. 多异瓢虫对核桃黑斑蚜的捕食作用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(6):1289-1294. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2023.01.016
[12]	彭雪凡, 周晓通, 维尼热·买合木提, 等. 不同功能植物对棉花蚜虫及其捕食性天敌的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2024, 51(1):39-49.
[13]	文霞, 陈凤, 程令, 等. 多异瓢虫对白毛蚜的捕食功能反应[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2019, 42(4):272-275.
[14]	帕提玛·乌木尔汗, 马召, 阿卜力孜·塔伊尔, 等. 多异瓢虫对番茄潜叶蛾的捕食功能反应[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2024, 40(4):787-792. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2024.05.003
[15]	郭佩佩. 多异瓢虫对设施蔬菜烟粉虱及蚜虫的控制作用研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021.
[16]	冯宏祖, 王兰. 十一星瓢虫对棉蚜的控制作用的评估[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008(1):375-378.
[17]	HOLLING C S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism[J]. The Canadian entomologist, 1959, 91(7):385-398. doi: 10.4039/Ent91385-7 URL
[18]	丁岩钦. 昆虫数学生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1994.
[19]	HASSELL M P, VARLEY G C. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control[J]. Nature, 1969, 223(5211):1133-1137. doi: 10.1038/2231133a0
[20]	邹运鼎, 耿继光, 陈高潮, 等. 异色瓢虫若虫对麦三叉蚜的捕食作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 1996(2):197-200.
[21]	边文波, 刘晓, 耿军. 天敌昆虫控害作用机制和评价方法研究进展[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2016, 36(12):17-23,57.
[22]	王珏, 原国辉, 游秀峰, 等. 避难所对七星瓢虫捕食桃蚜功能反应的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2013, 50(4):942-950.
[23]	相栋, 旺珍, 尼玛玉珍, 等. 西藏横斑瓢虫生物学特性及对桃蚜的捕食功能[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2025, 41(5):1035-1045. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2025.01.014
[24]	邓嘉茹, 刘志伟, 霍立志, 等. 纤丽瓢虫对豆蚜的捕食功能反应[J]. 广东农业科学, 2024, 51(11):113-122.
[25]	蒋华, 杨晓霞, 李归林, 等. 核桃全斑蚜的发生与为害及其优势天敌四斑裸瓢虫的捕食作用[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2024, 61(6):1300-1311.
[26]	陈文书, 梁一鸣, 高朋, 等. 异色瓢虫对栗斑蚜的捕食作用[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2025, 47(2):593-600.
[27]	张晓滢, 彭之琦, 陆永跃, 等. 不同温度条件下叉角厉蝽对草地贪夜蛾幼虫的捕食作用[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2022, 44(2):273-280.
[28]	陈晗馨, 程高祺, 叶明月, 等. 六星瓢虫对柑橘木虱若虫的捕食功能反应及捕食偏好[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2024, 61(1):129-136.
[29]	何万财, 叶青青, 王飞凤, 等. 六斑月瓢虫对柑橘木虱的捕食作用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(3):514-522. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2023.05.001
[30]	雷鸯, 裘可盈, 董婉莹, 等. 大灰优蚜蝇对扶桑绵粉蚧的捕食作用[J]. 昆虫学报, 2024, 67(12):1684-1695.
[31]	丁笠. 三种瓢虫对桃粉蚜的捕食功能反应研究[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2012, 35(8):23-26.
[32]	白小军, 吴惠玲, 张丽荣, 等. 多异瓢虫对枸杞蚜虫的捕食功能反应[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2008(11):13-15.
[33]	张淑梅, 何嘉, 张蓉, 等. 人工释放多异瓢虫对枸杞蚜虫的田间控制作用[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2010(2):3-4.

供试虫	捕食功能反应方程	瞬时攻击率(a´)	处理时间/d	捕食效能/头	日最大捕食量/头	R²	卡方值X²
1龄幼虫	Na=0.5077N/(1+0.0614N)	0.5077	0.0614	8.27	16.29	0.9874	0.1424
2龄幼虫	Na=0.6694N/(1+0.0263N)	0.6694	0.0263	25.43	38.00	0.9877	0.3010
3龄幼虫	Na=0.8252N/(1+0.0083N)	0.8252	0.0083	99.59	120.68	0.9996	0.0046
4龄幼虫	Na=1.5790N/(1+0.0054N)	1.5790	0.0054	291.81	184.81	0.9729	0.3477
雌成虫	Na=1.5420N/(1+0.0057N)	1.5420	0.0057	271.41	176.01	0.9544	0.8228
雄成虫	Na=1.4080N/(1+0.0066N)	1.4080	0.0066	213.11	151.35	0.9538	0.5632

供试虫	捕食功能反应方程	瞬时攻击率(a´)	处理时间/d	捕食效能/头	日最大捕食量/头	R²	卡方值X²
1龄幼虫	Na=0.5077N/(1+0.0614N)	0.5077	0.0614	8.27	16.29	0.9874	0.1424
2龄幼虫	Na=0.6694N/(1+0.0263N)	0.6694	0.0263	25.43	38.00	0.9877	0.3010
3龄幼虫	Na=0.8252N/(1+0.0083N)	0.8252	0.0083	99.59	120.68	0.9996	0.0046
4龄幼虫	Na=1.5790N/(1+0.0054N)	1.5790	0.0054	291.81	184.81	0.9729	0.3477
雌成虫	Na=1.5420N/(1+0.0057N)	1.5420	0.0057	271.41	176.01	0.9544	0.8228
雄成虫	Na=1.4080N/(1+0.0066N)	1.4080	0.0066	213.11	151.35	0.9538	0.5632

供试虫	寻找反应方程
1龄幼虫	S=0.5077/(1+0.5077×0.0614N)
2龄幼虫	S=0.6694/(1+0.6694×0.0263N)
3龄幼虫	S=0.8252/(1+0.8252×0.0083N)
4龄幼虫	S=1.5790/(1+1.5790×0.0054N)
雌成虫	S=1.5420/(1+1.5420×0.0057N)
雄成虫	S=1.4080/(1+1.4080×0.0066N)

供试虫	寻找反应方程
1龄幼虫	S=0.5077/(1+0.5077×0.0614N)
2龄幼虫	S=0.6694/(1+0.6694×0.0263N)
3龄幼虫	S=0.8252/(1+0.8252×0.0083N)
4龄幼虫	S=1.5790/(1+1.5790×0.0054N)
雌成虫	S=1.5420/(1+1.5420×0.0057N)
雄成虫	S=1.4080/(1+1.4080×0.0066N)

供试虫态	天敌密度/（头/皿）	平均捕食量/头	捕食作用率(E)	分摊竞争强度(I)	干扰效应模型	干扰系数(m)	R²
1龄幼虫	1	16.2	0.054	0.000	E_1龄=0.054P^-0.290	0.290	0.991
	2	13.0	0.043	0.198
	3	11.5	0.038	0.292
	4	10.7	0.036	0.340
	5	10.4	0.035	0.358
2龄幼虫	1	35.4	0.118	0.000	E_2龄=0.117P^-0.398	0.398	0.996
	2	26.0	0.087	0.266
	3	23.1	0.077	0.348
	4	20.5	0.068	0.421
	5	18.5	0.062	0.478
3龄幼虫	1	85.4	0.285	0.000	E_3龄=0.284P^-0.444	0.444	0.998
	2	62.9	0.210	0.263
	3	51.1	0.170	0.401
	4	46.1	0.154	0.460
	5	42.6	0.142	0.502
4龄幼虫	1	137.4	0.458	0.000	E_4龄=0.476P^-0.535	0.535	0.940
	2	113.0	0.377	0.178
	3	79.1	0.264	0.424
	4	62.0	0.211	0.539
	5	54.7	0.182	0.602
雌成虫	1	129.2	0.431	0.000	E_雌=0.448P^-0.507	0.507	0.934
	2	108.1	0.360	0.163
	3	78.0	0.260	0.395
	4	62.8	0.209	0.514
	5	53.2	0.177	0.589
雄成虫	1	118.6	0.395	0.000	E_雄=0.394P^-0.597	0.597	0.999
	2	76.6	0.255	0.354
	3	62.0	0.207	0.477
	4	51.4	0.171	0.567
	5	46.0	0.153	0.612