Genetic Distance of Soybean Parents and Heterosis: Correlation Study

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190700385

Abstract

Abstract:

The prediction of heterosis could improve the breeding efficiency. We selected 10 materials from different regions at home and abroad, and matched 45 hybrid combinations according to the incomplete diallel cross model (NCⅡ), and predicted the heterosis of soybean parents by the genetic distance of SSR molecular markers. The results showed that: 417 polymorphic alleles were detected in 10 parents; the variation range of polymorphic loci was 2-5, the genetic similarity coefficient (GS) varied from 0.520 to 0.695, and the average GS was 0.5996; 10 test materials could be divided into two categories, the heterosis value of F₁ was from 3.4% to 42.1%, indicating that all the traits of F₁ had positive heterosis in different degrees; the correlation between the heterosis value and genetic distance was 0.461, reaching a significant level; the correlation between the other 8 agronomic and quality traits and the genetic distance was positive, but the correlation coefficient was not significant. The results of heterosis prediction of 10 soybean parents by using 174 SSR molecular markers are not obvious, and the methods of soybean heterosis prediction by molecular markers need to be further explored.

Key words: soybean parents, heterosis, molecular marker, genetic distance, correlation, heterosis predication

CLC Number:

S565.1

Wu Qian, Li Zhi, Yu Wei, Li Jiekun, Hu Guoyu, Wang Dagang, Huang Zhiping. Genetic Distance of Soybean Parents and Heterosis: Correlation Study[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(1): 43-48.

Figures/Tables 5

References 28

[1]	杨加银 . 大豆的杂种优势和杂种产量的数量遗传学解析[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2010.
[2]	王艳玲, 奚广生, 王丕武 , 等. 大豆不同杂交组合杂种优势分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2008,27(5):760-763.
[3]	刘红占 . 小麦雄性不育蛋白组学与泛素化修饰蛋白组学的研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2014.
[4]	Wentz J B, Stewart R T . Hybrid vigor in soybeans[J]. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 1924,16:534-540. doi: 10.2134/agronj1924.00021962001600080008x URL
[5]	张宇, 于丽杰 . 大豆(Glycine max)雄性不育的研究与利用进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019.
[6]	杨蛟, 张涛, 蒋开锋 , 等. 分子标记遗传距离用于水稻杂种优势预测研究进展[J]. 杂交水稻, 2010,S1:321-325.
[7]	段发平, 梁承邺, 黎垣庆 . 水稻杂种优势预测方法的现状、问题与对策[J]. 杂交水稻, 2000,15(2):1-3.
[8]	Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L , et al. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis in rice as revealed by PCR-based markers[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1996,92(6):637-643. doi: 10.1007/BF00226083 URL
[9]	Zhao M F, Li X H, Yang J B , et al. Relationship between molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance in intra-and inter-subspecific crosses of rice[J]. Plant Breeding, 2007,126(4):385-391. doi: 10.1111/pbr.2007.126.issue-4 URL
[10]	姚艳梅, 聂平, 杜德志 . 不同生态类型甘蓝型油菜的SPAP分析及其遗传距离与杂种优势的关系[J]. 西北农业学报, 2012,21(1):80-87.
[11]	张志清, 郑有良, 魏育明 , 等. SSR标记遗传距离与小麦杂种优势相关分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2003,21(1):6-9.
[12]	赵应忠, 刘红艳 . 芝麻雄性不育系与核心种质间的遗传距离和杂种优势[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2005,27(1):36-40.
[13]	Nei M . Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided population[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1971,70:3321-3323
[14]	Sneath P H A, Sokal R R . Numerical taxonomy[M]. San Francisco: WH Freeman Press, 1973:230-234
[15]	M Lee, Godshalk EB, Lamkey KR , et al. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their of crosses[J]. Crop Science, 1989,29(4):1067-1071. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900040050x URL
[16]	张涛, 倪先林, 蒋开锋 , 等. 水稻功能基因标记遗传距离与杂种优势的相关性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009,23(6):567-572. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2009.06.02 URL
[17]	李义良, 赵奋成, 吴惠姗 , 等. 湿加松亲本间遗传距离与杂种优势的相关性分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2012,25(2):138-143.
[18]	徐美兰, 金正勋, 李晓光 , 等. 7个粳稻SSR和SRAP分子标记遗传距离比较及其与产量性状杂种优势的关系[J]. 分子植物育种, 2009,7(6):1084-1092.
[19]	金正勋, 姜文洙, 晋重玄 , 等. 籼稻RAPD标记遗传距离与杂种后代稻米味度及RVA谱特性的相关分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2005,19(1):29-35.
[20]	Doyle J J, Doyle J L . Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue[J]. Focus, 1990,12:13-15. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFocus.12.13 URL
[21]	李善文, 张志毅, 于志水 , 等. 杨树杂交亲本林业科学分子遗传距离与子代生长性状的相关性[J]. 林业科学, 2008,44(5):150-154. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20080527 URL
[22]	张一, 储德裕, 金国庆 , 等. 马尾松亲本遗传距离与子代生长性状相关性分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010,23(2):215-220.
[23]	Boppenmaier J, Melchinger A E, Sertz G . Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreed performance of crosses within between heterosis group for grain traits[J]. Plant Breeding, 1993,113:219-226.
[24]	赵庆勇, 朱镇, 张亚东 , 等. SSR标记遗传距离与粳稻杂种优势的相关性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009,23(2):141-147.
[25]	谭祖猛, 李云昌, 胡琼 , 等. 通过分子标记估算遗传距离预测甘蓝型油菜的杂种优势[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2007,29(2):20-26.
[26]	黄光文, 欧立军, 陈觉粱 , 等. 水稻ISSR标记遗传距离与杂种优势的相关性研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2010,9:326-331.
[27]	兰进好, 张宝石, 周鸿飞 . 作物杂种优势遗传基础研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(1):114-119.
[28]	商连光, 高振宇, 钱前 . 作物杂种优势遗传基础的研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2017,52(1):10-18. doi: 10.11983/CBB16187 URL

材料序号	品种名称	材料序号	品种名称
P1	晋豆21	P6	合豆3号
P2	冀豆17	P7	Clark
P3	汾豆79	P8	中黄13
P4	南农1138-2	P9	晋大70
P5	合豆1号	P10	Harosoy

材料序号	品种名称	材料序号	品种名称
P1	晋豆21	P6	合豆3号
P2	冀豆17	P7	Clark
P3	汾豆79	P8	中黄13
P4	南农1138-2	P9	晋大70
P5	合豆1号	P10	Harosoy

材料	晋豆21	冀豆17	汾豆79	南农1138-2	合豆1号	合豆3号	Clark	中黄13	晋大70	Harsoy
晋豆21	1.000	0.587	0.577	0.552	0.580	0.608	0.540	0.551	0.593	0.520
冀豆17	0.587	1.000	0.608	0.612	0.566	0.656	0.643	0.630	0.599	0.593
汾豆79	0.577	0.608	1.000	0.550	0.561	0.593	0.695	0.577	0.626	0.599
南农1138-2	0.552	0.612	0.550	1.000	0.630	0.650	0.524	0.682	0.520	0.574
合豆1号	0.580	0.566	0.561	0.630	1.000	0.661	0.565	0.628	0.593	0.570
合豆3号	0.608	0.656	0.593	0.650	0.661	1.000	0.580	0.635	0.600	0.593
Clark	0.540	0.643	0.695	0.524	0.565	0.580	1.000	0.534	0.633	0.607
中黄13	0.551	0.630	0.577	0.682	0.628	0.635	0.534	1.000	0.611	0.597
晋大70	0.593	0.599	0.626	0.520	0.593	0.600	0.633	0.611	1.000	0.553
Harsoy	0.520	0.593	0.599	0.574	0.570	0.593	0.607	0.597	0.553	1.000

材料	晋豆21	冀豆17	汾豆79	南农1138-2	合豆1号	合豆3号	Clark	中黄13	晋大70	Harsoy
晋豆21	1.000	0.587	0.577	0.552	0.580	0.608	0.540	0.551	0.593	0.520
冀豆17	0.587	1.000	0.608	0.612	0.566	0.656	0.643	0.630	0.599	0.593
汾豆79	0.577	0.608	1.000	0.550	0.561	0.593	0.695	0.577	0.626	0.599
南农1138-2	0.552	0.612	0.550	1.000	0.630	0.650	0.524	0.682	0.520	0.574
合豆1号	0.580	0.566	0.561	0.630	1.000	0.661	0.565	0.628	0.593	0.570
合豆3号	0.608	0.656	0.593	0.650	0.661	1.000	0.580	0.635	0.600	0.593
Clark	0.540	0.643	0.695	0.524	0.565	0.580	1.000	0.534	0.633	0.607
中黄13	0.551	0.630	0.577	0.682	0.628	0.635	0.534	1.000	0.611	0.597
晋大70	0.593	0.599	0.626	0.520	0.593	0.600	0.633	0.611	1.000	0.553
Harsoy	0.520	0.593	0.599	0.574	0.570	0.593	0.607	0.597	0.553	1.000

组合		遗传距离(GD)		杂种优势/%
组合		遗传距离(GD)		株高		主茎节数		分枝数		单株荚数		单株粒数	单株粒重	百粒重	蛋白质含量		脂肪含量
晋豆21×汾豆79		0.423		18.3		6.9		19.7		21.1		20.4	25.8	18.1	6.6		5.4
晋豆21×Clark		0.460		25.5		23.4		33.1		23.8		18.2	19.1	25.3	18.3		3.4
晋豆21×南农1138-2		0.448		16.5		15.8		27.5		19.9		12.5	28.4	19.1	15.7		3.8
冀豆17×晋豆21		0.413		12.4		11.6		4.6		16.1		14.3	42.1	16.1	12.8		8.9
冀豆17×南农1138-2		0.388		11.5		10.2		16.4		19.5		18.6	25.2	14.8	4.2		6.5
冀豆17×汾豆79		0.392		12.1		25.7		28.7		15.4		17.4	9.6	8.4	8.5		11.2
冀豆17×合豆1号		0.434		5.4		27.8		10.4		26.7		21.3	31.8	4.3	6.9		9.4
冀豆17×合豆3号		0.344		15.3		15.1		25.6		30.4		28.3	11.2	13.2	9.3		7.3
冀豆17×Clark		0.357		16.3		9.6		8.5		18.7		19.6	19.3	26.6	11.7		10.6
冀豆17×中黄13		0.370		14.1		15.6		20.4		20.8		11.7	20.5	18.2	7.3		5.2
冀豆17×Harosoy		0.407		12.9		19.4		16.5		17.9		18.1	23.8	15.7	14.4		8.7
南农1138-2×汾豆79		0.450		16.8		5.3		19.1		9.7		23.7	29.1	24.1	11.2		5.3
南农1138-2×合豆3		0.350		9.8		19.2		15.1		14.6		11.1	12.5	11.8	19.3		8.4
南农1138-2×晋豆21	0.448		4.6		6.7		11.6		34.5		23.1		25.1	11.1		7.5	6.8
南农1138-2×合豆1号	0.370		8.7		16.1		26.1		21.5		20.7		16.4	18.5		10.1	9.3
合豆1号×汾豆79	0.439		12.4		13.9		29.2		40.5		22.1		21.9	17.8		10.6	13.4
合豆1号×合豆3号	0.339		8.5		18.5		20.1		30.2		6.8		19.2	10.4		9.8	6.3
合豆1号×Clark	0.435		13.4		8.6		11.3		16.9		22.3		14.7	9.3		5.6	8.1
合豆3号×晋豆21	0.392		11.6		15.4		26.7		16.4		24.5		11.5	19.3		9.1	4.6
合豆3号×Harosoy	0.407		23.8		16.7		17.8		11.7		10.2		20.3	5.7		12.6	7.2
合豆3号×汾豆79	0.407		19.3		20.4		24.5		8.9		10.8		7.8	11.2		11.1	10.7
合豆3号×Clark	0.420		16.8		18.5		18.3		15.3		14.6		15.2	8.1		4.3	12.3
Clark×南农1138-2	0.476		20.2		21.5		30.2		20.4		32.1		19.4	16.8		15.5	11.5
Clark×汾豆79	0.305		7.8		16.3		8.5		16.5		4.5		23.8	15.1		12.1	8.1
中黄13×晋豆21	0.449		12.7		26.8		15.8		28.1		23.4		20.4	9.8		10.1	14.1
中黄13×汾豆79	0.423		17.6		21.8		16.7		30.5		21.6		13.7	20.8		6.4	4.5
中黄13×南农1138-2	0.318		5.7		15.4		17.8		13.3		19.7		15.5	11.4		7.2	6.1
中黄13×合豆1号	0.372		10.3		20.7		28.3		20.6		19.4		18.1	17.6		8.3	8.4
中黄13×合豆3号	0.365		19		15.1		19.8		18.5		18.2		26.8	6.9		4.6	9.9
中黄13×Clark	0.466		23.6		19.4		36.7		30.3		30.6		13.5	13.5		18.4	11.2
中黄13×晋大70	0.389		8.9		8.7		15.6		15.2		19.6		12.4	8.4		7.1	12.9
中黄13×Harosoy	0.403		16.3		18.9		16.7		9.4		11.9		12.8	14.3		9.4	15.6
晋大70×晋豆21	0.407		11.4		23.8		11.8		11.3		10.3		18.7	23.5		13.7	5.3
晋大70×合豆1号	0.407		20.7		23.7		7.2		15.6		10.6		9.4	16.2		11.3	7.4
晋大70×冀豆17	0.401		16.9		26.9		13.6		8.9		13.2		11.8	5.8		14.2	10.6
晋大70×汾豆79	0.374		25.2		17.1		8.9		14.8		13.7		21.1	18.3		17.3	7.5
晋大70×南农1138-2	0.480		11.3		20.5		11.1		18.6		21.6		21.3	22.4		9.2	19
晋大70×合豆3号	0.400		17.8		23.6		31.6		29.1		10.5		18.7	20.9		10.3	8.8
晋大70×Harosoy	0.447		21.6		30.4		15.3		10.4		21.4		20.2	18.1		12.1	7.8
晋大70×Clark	0.367		13.4		15.7		6.7		20.6		26.8		19.4	19.5		5.9	6.5
Harosoy×晋豆21	0.480		10.8		29.5		35.2		15.9		32.2		26.3	17.5		13.9	11.4
Harosoy×汾豆79	0.401		17.5		17.3		9.8		13.4		18.1		10.7	23.4		10.2	7.2
Harosoy×Clark	0.393		16.8		19.1		18.6		31.2		26.9		17.8	18.5		6.9	9.3
Harosoy×南农1138-2	0.426		13.6		14.8		19.4		15.5		21.1		21.5	25.9		8.4	13.5
Harosoy×合豆1号	0.430		11.4		25.5		15.8		28.5		22.3		16.5	8.7		9.3	10.1
遗传距离与杂种优势相关性	相关系数r		0.286		0.227		0.271		0.124		0.461*		0.220	0.141		0.202	0.266