Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (22): 116-122.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190700472
Previous Articles Next Articles
Feng Jinrui1(), Wang Yan1(
), Yao Huihui1, Wu Weiguo1, Zhao Chuanwen2
Received:
2019-07-23
Revised:
2019-10-14
Online:
2020-08-05
Published:
2020-07-22
Contact:
Wang Yan
E-mail:450844193@qq.com;693675748@qq.com
CLC Number:
Feng Jinrui, Wang Yan, Yao Huihui, Wu Weiguo, Zhao Chuanwen. The Formula of Acid Modified Wheat Bran Noodles[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(22): 116-122.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190700472
项目 | 分值 | 评分标准 |
---|---|---|
色泽 | 10 | 面条颜色和亮度好、呈淡黄绿色为8.0~10分,一般为4.0~7.9分,颜色发暗、亮度差为1.0~3.9分 |
表观状态 | 10 | 面条的表面结构细密、光滑为8.0~10分,一般为4.0~7.9分,表面粗糙、变形严重为1.0~3.9分 |
适口性 | 20 | 牙咬面条的力度适中为16.0~20分,偏硬或偏软为11.0~15.9分,过硬或过软为1.0~10.9分 |
韧性 | 25 | 面条有咬劲、富有弹性为21.0~25分,一般为16.0~20.9分,咬劲差、弹性不足为1.0~15.9分 |
黏性 | 25 | 咀嚼时爽口、不黏牙为21.0~25分,一般为16.0~20.9分,不爽口、发黏为1.0~15.9分 |
光滑性 | 5 | 品尝面条时口感光滑为4.0~5分,一般为3.0~3.9分,较差为1.0~2.9分 |
食味 | 5 | 具有麦麸独特的香味为4.0~5分,基本无异味为3.0~3.9分,较差为1.0~2.9分 |
项目 | 分值 | 评分标准 |
---|---|---|
色泽 | 10 | 面条颜色和亮度好、呈淡黄绿色为8.0~10分,一般为4.0~7.9分,颜色发暗、亮度差为1.0~3.9分 |
表观状态 | 10 | 面条的表面结构细密、光滑为8.0~10分,一般为4.0~7.9分,表面粗糙、变形严重为1.0~3.9分 |
适口性 | 20 | 牙咬面条的力度适中为16.0~20分,偏硬或偏软为11.0~15.9分,过硬或过软为1.0~10.9分 |
韧性 | 25 | 面条有咬劲、富有弹性为21.0~25分,一般为16.0~20.9分,咬劲差、弹性不足为1.0~15.9分 |
黏性 | 25 | 咀嚼时爽口、不黏牙为21.0~25分,一般为16.0~20.9分,不爽口、发黏为1.0~15.9分 |
光滑性 | 5 | 品尝面条时口感光滑为4.0~5分,一般为3.0~3.9分,较差为1.0~2.9分 |
食味 | 5 | 具有麦麸独特的香味为4.0~5分,基本无异味为3.0~3.9分,较差为1.0~2.9分 |
酸改性麦麸粉添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 16.8 | 19.2 | 18.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 79.2 |
3 | 8.7 | 8.7 | 17.5 | 20.1 | 21.0 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 83.9 |
6 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 18.8 | 20.1 | 20.9 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 86.1 |
9 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 16.9 | 19.7 | 21.7 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 83.0 |
12 | 8.3 | 8.2 | 17.3 | 19.4 | 18.6 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 79.8 |
酸改性麦麸粉添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 16.8 | 19.2 | 18.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 79.2 |
3 | 8.7 | 8.7 | 17.5 | 20.1 | 21.0 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 83.9 |
6 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 18.8 | 20.1 | 20.9 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 86.1 |
9 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 16.9 | 19.7 | 21.7 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 83.0 |
12 | 8.3 | 8.2 | 17.3 | 19.4 | 18.6 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 79.8 |
水添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 17.2 | 18.6 | 20.4 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 78.9 |
52 | 8.7 | 8.9 | 18.3 | 19.8 | 20.3 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 83.9 |
54 | 8.9 | 9.2 | 19.0 | 21.3 | 21.1 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 88.1 |
56 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 18.9 | 20.7 | 20.9 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 85.5 |
58 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 18.6 | 20.5 | 20.7 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 84.0 |
水添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 17.2 | 18.6 | 20.4 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 78.9 |
52 | 8.7 | 8.9 | 18.3 | 19.8 | 20.3 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 83.9 |
54 | 8.9 | 9.2 | 19.0 | 21.3 | 21.1 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 88.1 |
56 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 18.9 | 20.7 | 20.9 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 85.5 |
58 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 18.6 | 20.5 | 20.7 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 84.0 |
食盐添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 | 8.2 | 8.5 | 18.3 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 83.5 |
2 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 18.3 | 20.8 | 21.5 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 85.8 |
2.5 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 18.9 | 21.2 | 21.6 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 87.0 |
3 | 8.5 | 8.8 | 19.0 | 21.3 | 21.6 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 87.3 |
3.5 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 18.7 | 20.9 | 21.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 86.1 |
食盐添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 | 8.2 | 8.5 | 18.3 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 83.5 |
2 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 18.3 | 20.8 | 21.5 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 85.8 |
2.5 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 18.9 | 21.2 | 21.6 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 87.0 |
3 | 8.5 | 8.8 | 19.0 | 21.3 | 21.6 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 87.3 |
3.5 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 18.7 | 20.9 | 21.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 86.1 |
食碱添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 18.9 | 20.5 | 20.7 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 84.0 |
0.2 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 18.9 | 20.6 | 20.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 84.7 |
0.3 | 8.4 | 9.2 | 19.1 | 20.9 | 21.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 87.3 |
0.4 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 18.7 | 20.1 | 21.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 85.1 |
0.5 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 18.5 | 20.1 | 20.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 83.7 |
食碱添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 18.9 | 20.5 | 20.7 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 84.0 |
0.2 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 18.9 | 20.6 | 20.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 84.7 |
0.3 | 8.4 | 9.2 | 19.1 | 20.9 | 21.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 87.3 |
0.4 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 18.7 | 20.1 | 21.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 85.1 |
0.5 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 18.5 | 20.1 | 20.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 83.7 |
羧甲基纤维素钠添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.2 | 7.9 | 7.2 | 18.2 | 20.1 | 19.2 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 80.2 |
0.3 | 8.2 | 8.6 | 18.1 | 20.2 | 19.3 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 81.9 |
0.4 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 85.9 |
0.5 | 8.0 | 7.9 | 17.9 | 20.4 | 18.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 80.7 |
0.6 | 7.0 | 7.3 | 16.3 | 20.0 | 18.1 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 75.1 |
羧甲基纤维素钠添加量/% | 色泽 | 表观状态 | 适口性 | 韧性 | 黏性 | 光滑性 | 食味 | 感官评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.2 | 7.9 | 7.2 | 18.2 | 20.1 | 19.2 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 80.2 |
0.3 | 8.2 | 8.6 | 18.1 | 20.2 | 19.3 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 81.9 |
0.4 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 85.9 |
0.5 | 8.0 | 7.9 | 17.9 | 20.4 | 18.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 80.7 |
0.6 | 7.0 | 7.3 | 16.3 | 20.0 | 18.1 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 75.1 |
试验号 | A | B | C | D | E | 感官评分 | 断条率/% | 烹煮损失率/% | 烹煮吸水率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 79.6 | 10 | 6.16 | 113.51 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 79.9 | 0 | 6.97 | 105.63 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 81 | 0 | 5.03 | 99.71 |
4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 81.1 | 0 | 7.91 | 112.61 |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 81.7 | 0 | 4.87 | 130.72 |
6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 85.3 | 10 | 7.16 | 112.28 |
7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 86.2 | 0 | 6.54 | 119.85 |
8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 82.9 | 0 | 6.37 | 106.87 |
9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 83.3 | 10 | 7.05 | 119.31 |
10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 83.4 | 10 | 5.21 | 121.77 |
11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 81.7 | 0 | 5.79 | 113.45 |
12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 82.8 | 0 | 7.74 | 108.32 |
13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 81.6 | 0 | 7.13 | 107.38 |
14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 79.3 | 10 | 5.24 | 109.21 |
15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 80.1 | 0 | 6.22 | 100.73 |
16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 80.8 | 0 | 5.99 | 121.69 |
K1 | 80.4 | 81.55 | 81.85 | 81.98 | 81.5 | ||||
K2 | 84.03 | 81.98 | 81.13 | 81.53 | 82.55 | ||||
K3 | 82.8 | 82.25 | 81.63 | 81.73 | 82.68 | ||||
K4 | 80.45 | 81.9 | 83.08 | 82.45 | 80.95 | ||||
R | 3.63 | 0.70 | 1.95 | 0.92 | 1.73 | ||||
最优水平 | A2 | B3 | C4 | D4 | E3 | ||||
因素主次 | A>C>E>D>B |
试验号 | A | B | C | D | E | 感官评分 | 断条率/% | 烹煮损失率/% | 烹煮吸水率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 79.6 | 10 | 6.16 | 113.51 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 79.9 | 0 | 6.97 | 105.63 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 81 | 0 | 5.03 | 99.71 |
4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 81.1 | 0 | 7.91 | 112.61 |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 81.7 | 0 | 4.87 | 130.72 |
6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 85.3 | 10 | 7.16 | 112.28 |
7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 86.2 | 0 | 6.54 | 119.85 |
8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 82.9 | 0 | 6.37 | 106.87 |
9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 83.3 | 10 | 7.05 | 119.31 |
10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 83.4 | 10 | 5.21 | 121.77 |
11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 81.7 | 0 | 5.79 | 113.45 |
12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 82.8 | 0 | 7.74 | 108.32 |
13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 81.6 | 0 | 7.13 | 107.38 |
14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 79.3 | 10 | 5.24 | 109.21 |
15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 80.1 | 0 | 6.22 | 100.73 |
16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 80.8 | 0 | 5.99 | 121.69 |
K1 | 80.4 | 81.55 | 81.85 | 81.98 | 81.5 | ||||
K2 | 84.03 | 81.98 | 81.13 | 81.53 | 82.55 | ||||
K3 | 82.8 | 82.25 | 81.63 | 81.73 | 82.68 | ||||
K4 | 80.45 | 81.9 | 83.08 | 82.45 | 80.95 | ||||
R | 3.63 | 0.70 | 1.95 | 0.92 | 1.73 | ||||
最优水平 | A2 | B3 | C4 | D4 | E3 | ||||
因素主次 | A>C>E>D>B |
指标 | 市售挂面 | 无酸改性麦麸添加 | 酸改性麦麸添加组 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
成分指标 | 灰分/% | 4.61±0.75 | 2.25±0.88 | 6.56±0.38 |
脂肪/% | 3.97±0.62 | 1.10±0.21 | 3.28±0.27 | |
SDF/% | 0.83±0.19 | 0.24±0.09 | 17.28±1.05 | |
品质指标 | 断条率/% | 0 | 10 | 0 |
烹煮损失率/% | 4.37±0.46 | 6.54±0.31 | 4.43±0.28 | |
烹煮吸水率/% | 127.08±14.92 | 112.29±11.98 | 130.69±13.33 | |
感官评分 | 86.4±3.22 | 78.8±5.12 | 86.5±4.16 | |
质构指标 | 硬度/g | 4816.734±64.026 | 4304.796±831.165 | 6329.445±259.212 |
弹性/J | 0.922±0.035 | 0.943±0.039 | 0.949±0.032 | |
凝聚力/N | 0.664±0.024 | 0.583±0.027 | 0.557±0.002 | |
胶着性/cps | 3198.471±95.096 | 2509.967±520.486 | 3527.089±151.961 | |
咀嚼性/g | 2952.24±192.047 | 2372.879±547.244 | 3347.373±193.090 | |
回复性 | 0.342±0.007 | 0.249±0.026 | 0.235±0.006 |
指标 | 市售挂面 | 无酸改性麦麸添加 | 酸改性麦麸添加组 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
成分指标 | 灰分/% | 4.61±0.75 | 2.25±0.88 | 6.56±0.38 |
脂肪/% | 3.97±0.62 | 1.10±0.21 | 3.28±0.27 | |
SDF/% | 0.83±0.19 | 0.24±0.09 | 17.28±1.05 | |
品质指标 | 断条率/% | 0 | 10 | 0 |
烹煮损失率/% | 4.37±0.46 | 6.54±0.31 | 4.43±0.28 | |
烹煮吸水率/% | 127.08±14.92 | 112.29±11.98 | 130.69±13.33 | |
感官评分 | 86.4±3.22 | 78.8±5.12 | 86.5±4.16 | |
质构指标 | 硬度/g | 4816.734±64.026 | 4304.796±831.165 | 6329.445±259.212 |
弹性/J | 0.922±0.035 | 0.943±0.039 | 0.949±0.032 | |
凝聚力/N | 0.664±0.024 | 0.583±0.027 | 0.557±0.002 | |
胶着性/cps | 3198.471±95.096 | 2509.967±520.486 | 3527.089±151.961 | |
咀嚼性/g | 2952.24±192.047 | 2372.879±547.244 | 3347.373±193.090 | |
回复性 | 0.342±0.007 | 0.249±0.026 | 0.235±0.006 |
[1] | 毕宁宁, 谢岩黎, 赵文红. 麸皮的添加量对面团流变学特性和馒头品质的影响[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2014,12(2):28-30. |
[2] | Bonnand-Ducasse M, Valle G D, Lefebvre J, et al. Effect of wheat dietary fibres on bread dough development and rheological properties[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2010,52(2):200-206. |
[3] |
Zhu K X, Sheng H, Wei P, et al. Effect of ultrafine grinding on hydration and antioxidant properties of wheat bran dietary fiber[J]. Food Research International, 2010,43(4):943-948.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.01.005 URL |
[4] | 刘姣, 汪丽萍, 吴卫国, 等. 麦麸木聚糖酶处理条件对全麦挂面品质的影响[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2016,24(3):79-85. |
[5] | 范玲, 马森, 王晓曦, 等. 麦麸添加量和粒度对发酵面团特性的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2016,31(6):29-34. |
[6] | 林江涛, 郝学飞, 卞科. 在我国开展面粉营养强化应注意的几个问题[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2006(1):13-15. |
[7] |
Traynham T L, Carriquiry A L. Evaluation of water holding capacity for wheat-soy flour blends[J]. J Amer Oil Chem Soc, 2007,84:151-155.
doi: 10.1007/s11746-006-1018-0 URL |
[8] | 江鹏, 陆启玉. 营养强化面条研究进展[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2016,29(8):14-17. |
[9] | 郑立红, 侍朋宝, 杜连启, 等. 枸杞菜营养挂面的研制[J]. 食品工业科技, 2012,33(9):222-224. |
[10] | 汪丽萍, 田晓红, 刘明, 等. 苦荞超微粉对苦荞小麦混合粉及其挂面品质的影响[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2015,23(1):1-4. |
[11] | 薛淑静, 关健, 周明, 等. 南瓜粉对其营养强化挂面品质的影响[J]. 食品科学技术学报, 2013,31(6):46-50. |
[12] | 姚慧慧, 王燕, 吴卫国, 等. 酸改性麦麸粉对面粉粉质特性及面团质构特性的影响[J]. 食品科学技术学报, 2019,40(2):59-64 |
[13] | 张娟, 蔺佳慧, 杨昉明. 大豆膳食纤维挂面的工艺研究[J]. 食品科技, 2012,37(8):152-157. |
[14] |
刘竟峰, 陆鹏, 张喻, 等. 马铃薯全粉对面粉糊化特性及馒头品质的影响[J]. 中国酿造, 2016,35(2):97-100.
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2016.02.022 URL |
[15] | 师俊玲. 蛋白质和淀粉对挂面及方便面品质影响机理研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2001. |
[16] | 潘润淑, 周光宏, 余小领, 等. 紫甘薯面条的加工工艺研究[J]. 食品科学, 2008,29(11):169-172. |
[17] |
杨玉民, 王大为. 高纤维玉米挂面生产技术[J]. 食品科学, 2010,31(20):509-512.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201020108 URL |
[18] | 师俊玲, 魏益民, 欧阳韶晖, 等. 蛋白质和淀粉含量对面条品质的影响研究[J]. 郑州工程学院学报, 2001(1):32-35. |
[19] | 张荣, 任清, 罗宇. 小米可溶性膳食纤维提取及其理化性质分析[J]. 食品科学, 2014,35(2):69-74. |
[20] | 王诗琪, 龚超, 连成杰, 等. 莲蓬膳食纤维挂面的配方优化及品质评价[J]. 食品科技, 2016(1):125-130. |
[21] | 张俊颖. 海带挂面加工工艺的研究[D]. 舟山:浙江海洋学院, 2015. |
[22] | 赵柏林. 关于含盐量对挂面质量影响的研究[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2007(5):57-58. |
[23] | 钟昔阳, 贾继伟, 王士雷, 等. 茯苓面条加工工艺中复合磷酸盐和食用碱工艺参数的响应面法优化[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41(8):3659-3662. |
[24] | 乔聚林, 刘传富, 董海洲, 等. 羧甲基纤维素钠对面团特性及面包品质的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2009,24(4):13-16. |
[25] | 张东仙, 项怡, 陈永强, 等. 添加燕麦麸皮对挂面品质特性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015,36(3):105-109. |
[1] | XIAO Yang, LI Qingrong, XING Dongxu, YANG Qiong. Effects of High Temperature Stress on Gene Expression of Chemosensory Protein in Midgut and Fat Body of Bombyx mori [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 107-115. |
[2] | NIU Liya, WANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, WANG Zhi, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Wei, YU Liang. Wheat Quality and Yield Traits: Effects on Scores of Steamed Bread and Noodles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 129-133. |
[3] | ZENG Duanxiang, YU Xiyue, YU Jingwen, JIA Jianping, PENG Deliang, HUANG Wenkun. Detection and Integrated Control Technology of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 86-91. |
[4] | CHEN Jiacong, HUANG Yongde, ZHU Wenjuan, YE Wenfang, WENG Jia, HUANG Xiuli, CHEN Rongde, CHEN Shuidao. The Shelf Life of Wet Rice Noodle: Prediction Based on Arrhenius Equation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 132-138. |
[5] | XU Ning, ZHAO Xia, WANG Rui, ZHANG Hui, LI Chunxi, ZHANG Zhao. Status Quo and Future Development Direction of Science and Technology of Grain Production at Home and Abroad [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 158-164. |
[6] | YANG Wuguang, WANG Jun, WEN Kai, QIU Jingtao. Research Progress and Prospect of Rice-Turtle Farming in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 12-16. |
[7] | ZHANG Zhiling, LIN Haibin, WANG Xinwang, LIN Long, CHEN Xingfeng, GAO Weimin, LIN Zubin, CHEN Qingwen. The Correlation Between the Starch Content and the Appearance Quality and Sensory Quality of Fujian Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 136-141. |
[8] | GUO Xiaoshan, WANG Linchuang, ZHAO Jianfeng, SUN Yudong, WANG Guolian, QU Haiyong, LUO Dexu, XU Wenzhao, YIN Lian. Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium on Saponin in Momordica charantia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 43-48. |
[9] | ZHANG Xia, XU Xiumei. Influencing Factors of Agricultural Technology Extension Efficiency——A Case Study of Pingdu City, Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 135-140. |
[10] | CHEN Liuhong, ZHAO Chunlei, WANG Xi, LI Yanli, DING Guangzhou, CHEN Li. Single-cell Transcriptome Sequencing Technology and Its Application in Plant Research [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 87-93. |
[11] | FU Huijuan, LI Xingyue, YI Jun, LI Qiyong, XU Bingzhi, CHEN Youhua, LUO Congcong, ZHANG Hong. Major Biological Disasters of Dry Farming in Sichuan Hilly Areas: Control Strategy and Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 140-147. |
[12] | TANG Ling, SUN Siqi, YAN Hua, LIU Yaxin, LIU Dali. A Review of Betacyanin Extraction and Purification [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 136-142. |
[13] | MA Shengzhou, ZHAO Fei, HU Ying, YUAN Xingxing, YANG Yiyang. Tea Cultivars from the Hilly Areas of Jiangsu Province: Suitability for Black Tea Processing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 32-38. |
[14] | ZHOU Lin, LI Mengsha, WANG Hua, SHEN Guang, LV Pin, ZHOU Liping. Comparative Study on Fruit Quality of Different Varieties of Lonicera caerulea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 44-49. |
[15] | LU Jian, WANG Dong, WANG Qun, FU Dejun, WU Dongfen, LIU Yu, ZHU Jianjie, LUO Yaoping. Comparison Analysis of Aromatic Constituents of Jasmine Scented Tea During Orthodox and Isolated Scenting Process [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 158-164. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||