欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (23): 12-18.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15030229

所属专题: 畜牧兽医

• 畜牧 动物医学 蚕 蜂 • 上一篇    下一篇

生猪养殖户的兽药使用行为与政府监管策略研究 ——基于江苏省阜宁县的案例

吴林海,谢旭燕,王晓莉   

  1. 江南大学 江苏省食品安全研究基地商学院,江南大学 江苏省食品安全研究基地商学院,江南大学
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-27 修回日期:2015-07-08 接受日期:2015-06-25 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2015-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 吴林海
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科重大项目“食品安全风险社会共治研究”(14ZDA069);国家自然科学基金项目“基于消费者偏好的可追溯食品消费政策的多重模拟实验研究:猪肉的案例”(71273117);江苏省六大人才高峰项目“食品安全消费政策研究:可追溯猪肉的案例”(2012-JY-002);江苏省高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队项目“中国食品安全风险防控研究”(2013-011);国家软科学项目“中国食品安全消费政策研究”(2013GXQ4B158)。

Pig Farmers’Use Behavior of Veterinary Drug and Government Supervision Strategy: A Case of Funing County in Jiangsu Province

王晓莉   

  • Received:2015-03-27 Revised:2015-07-08 Accepted:2015-06-25 Online:2015-08-20 Published:2015-08-20

摘要: 为探讨分析生猪养殖环节具有兽药负面使用行为的养殖户特征,提高政府对养殖户兽药使用行为监管的精准性,降低生猪质量的安全风险,基于对中国江苏省阜宁县654户生猪养殖户的调查数据,运用多元有序Logistic模型分析了可能采用兽药负面使用行为的养殖户特征。结果发现:男性、年龄较大、受教育程度较低、小规模及中等养殖规模、养殖年限在10年以上的养殖户更倾向于采取兽药负面使用行为。进一步分析表明,在其他条件不变的情况下,男性、小规模、养殖年限在10年以上的养殖户更倾向于采取中风险的兽药负面使用行为,而中等规模养殖户则更倾向于采取高风险的兽药负面使用行为;受教育水平较高及对违禁兽药、违规处罚认知较高的养殖户则更趋向于采取安全行为或低风险的负面行为。因此男性、中小规模、养殖年限在10年以上、受教育程度低等特征的养殖户,应该成为政府监管的主要对象。通过分类监管与打击违法违规行为,缓解农村生猪兽药使用相对有限的监管力量与相对无限的监管对象之间的矛盾。

关键词: 海藻生物有机肥, 海藻生物有机肥, 连作, 微生物, 酚酸

Abstract: To enhance the accuracy of government supervision over pig farmers’use behavior of veterinary drugs and reduce safety risks of pig quality, characteristics of pig farmers who have negative behaviors of using veterinary drugs in pig breeding were analyzed by Multi-element Orderly Logistic model based on empirical investigation of 654 pig farmers in Funing County, Jiangsu Province. The results showed that poorly-educated and elderly male farmers who had small and medium-scale pig farms and more than 10-years-experience were more likely to use veterinary drugs in a negative way. Further analysis revealed that male farmers who had small-scale pig farms with more than 10 years of pig farming experience were more likely to make mediumrisk negative use of veterinary drugs, while farmers who had medium- scale pig farms with the same other characteristics were more likely to make high- risk negative use of veterinary drugs; and highly- educated farmers with better knowledge of prohibited veterinary drugs and related laws and penalties were more likely to use veterinary drugs safely or make low-risk negative use of veterinary drugs. Thus, male, poorly-educated farmers who had small and medium-scale pig farms and engaged in breeding for above 10 years should become the major objects of government supervision. The contradiction between relatively limited regulatory power and relatively unlimited regulatory targets in negative use of veterinary drugs in rural areas can be reduced with classified regulation and cracking down on illegal behaviors and violations against the regulation.