Cry1Ac毒素突变体的构建、表达及杀虫活性测定

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110021

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (36): 139-144.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110021

Cry1Ac毒素突变体的构建、表达及杀虫活性测定

袁晓曼,丁照鑫,张淑臣,刘京国

北京农学院生物科学与工程学院,北京农学院生物科学与工程学院,北京农学院生物科学与工程学院,北京农学院生物科学与工程学院

收稿日期:2016-11-03 修回日期:2017-01-11 接受日期:2017-02-21 出版日期:2017-12-29 发布日期:2017-12-29
通讯作者: 刘京国
基金资助:
北京市教委面上项“氨肽酶N基因的克隆及其在Cry3A毒素杀虫过程中的作用”(KM201310020001)；北京市属高等学校高层次人才引进与培养计划(CIT&TCD20154044)。

The Construction, Expression and Insecticidal Activity Determination of Cry1Ac Toxin Mutant

袁晓曼,, and

Received:2016-11-03 Revised:2017-01-11 Accepted:2017-02-21 Online:2017-12-29 Published:2017-12-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了构建对敏感和类钙粘蛋白突变的抗性昆虫都具有高杀虫活性的毒素，将Cry1Ac毒素结构域I 中α1 和α2 之间插入一个α胰凝乳蛋白酶作用位点，并分析突变体毒素在苏云金芽孢杆菌中形成伴孢晶体、目标蛋白的表达情况，以及鉴定突变体毒素的杀虫活性。结果发现：4 个突变体蛋白都能在苏云金芽孢杆菌中表达产生约130 kDa 的目标蛋白，但不能形成有规则的伴孢晶体。这可能是由于突变体蛋白在Bt 生长的平稳期达到最高，在衰亡期开始被降解造成的。4 个突变体中，Cry1Acm4 在培养48 h 时产量最高，而且其对甜菜夜蛾杀虫活性比野生型高1.6 倍，但是其产量只有野生型毒素产量的十分之一。尽管由于Cry1Acm4 的表达量较低而使其实际应用的价值不大，但这种构建突变体的方法对研究高毒力的Cry1Ac毒素提供一种新的思路。

关键词: 药用植物, 药用植物, 填料, 减轻, 卷烟危害, 机理, 研究进展

Abstract: The aim is to construct the toxin with high insecticidal activity for resistant insects with sensitive resistance and cadherin-like protein mutant. α-chymotrypsin site was inserted between α1 and α2 of domain I of Cry1Ac toxin, the expression of target protein and the formation of parasporal crystal from mutant toxin in Bt was analyzed, the insecticidal activity of mutant toxin was determined. The results showed that, the four mutant proteins could express about 130 kDa target protein in Bacillus thuringiensis, but these mutants did not form regular parasporal crystal. The reason might be that the mutant protein reached the top at the stationary stage of Bacillus thuringiensis, and then it was degraded at the beginning of the decline stage. In the four mutants, Cry1Acm4 had the highest yield at 48 h, and its insecticidal activity for Spodoptera exigua was 1.6 times higher than that of the wild type, but the yield was only one tenth of toxin yield of wild type. Although it had little value in application for Cry1Acm4 because of the low expression, the construction method provided a new approach for researching Cry1Ac toxin with high insecticidal activity.

袁晓曼,丁照鑫,张淑臣,刘京国. Cry1Ac毒素突变体的构建、表达及杀虫活性测定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(36): 139-144.

袁晓曼,, and . The Construction, Expression and Insecticidal Activity Determination of Cry1Ac Toxin Mutant[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(36): 139-144.

参考文献

[1].Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van RJ, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins [J]. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1998(62):775-806.
[2].Bravo A, Likitvivatanavong S, Gill SS, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis: A story of a successful bioinsecticide [J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2011, 41(7):423-431.
[3].Tabashnik B. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thurinigienis[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1994, 39:47-79.
[4].Janmaat A, Myers J. Rapid evolution and the cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in greenhouse populations of cabbage loopers, Trichoplusia ni[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 270: 2263-2270.
[5].Pardo-López L, Soberón M, Bravo A. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2013, 37(1):3-22.
[6].Gómez I, Sánchez J, Miranda R, et al. Cadherin-like receptor binding facilitates proteolytic cleavage of helix alpha-1 in domain I and oligomer pre-pore formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin [J]. FEBS Letter, 2002, 513(2-3):242-246.
[7].Jiménez-Juárez N, Mu?oz-Garay C, Gómez I, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab mutants affecting oligomer formation are non-toxic to Manduca sexta larvae [J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2007, 282(29):21222-21229.
[8].Mu?óz-Garay C, Portugal L, Pardo-López L, et al. Characterization of the mechanism of action of the genetically modified Cry1AbMod toxin that is active against Cry1Ab-resistant insects [J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2009, 1788(10):2229-2237.
[9].Bravo A, Gómez I, Conde J, et al. Oligomerization triggers binding of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N receptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains [J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2004, 1667(1):38-46.
[10].Chen W, Liu C, Xiao Y, et al. A toxin-binding alkaline phosphatase fragment synergizes Bt toxin Cry1Ac against susceptible and resistant Helicoverpa armigera. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4):e0126288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126288. eCollection 2015.
[11].Zhuang M, Oltean DI, Gómez I, et al. Heliothis virescens and Manduca sexta lipid rafts are involved in Cry1A toxin binding to the midgut epithelium and subsequent pore formation [J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2002, 277(16):13863-13872.
[12].Caccia S, Di Lelio I, La Storia A, et al. Midgut microbiota and host immunocompetence underlie Bacillus thuringiensis killing mechanism [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2016, 113(34):9486-9491.
[13].Liu C, Li Y, Gao Y, Ning C, et al. Cotton bollworm resistance to Bt transgenic cotton: a case analysis [J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2010, 53(8):934-941.
[14].Xiao Y, Zhang T, Liu C, et al. Mis-splicing of the ABCC2 gene linked with Bt toxin resistance in Helicoverpa armigera [J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4:6184. doi: 10.1038/srep06184.
[15].Song X, Kain W, Cassidy D, et al. Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Cry2Ab in Trichoplusia ni Is Conferred by a Novel Genetic Mechanism [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 81(15):5184-5195.
[16].Soberón M, Pardo-López L, López I, et al. Engineering modified Bt toxins to counter insect resistance [J]. Science, 2007, 318(5856):1640-1642.
[17].Liu G, Song L, Shu C, et al. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki strain HD73 [J]. Genome Announcements, 2013, 1(2):e0008013. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00080-13.
[18].刘晶晶, 束长龙, 张杰, 等. 苏云金芽孢杆菌内生质粒提取方法的改进[J]. 生物技术通报, 2008 (6):120-123。
[19].萨姆布鲁克, 拉塞尔(2005). 分子克隆实验指南. 第3版. 北京: 科学出版社。
[20].Nickerson KW, Julian St G, Bulla LA. Physiology of spore forming bacteria associated with insects: radiorespirometric survey of carbohydrate metabolism in the 12 serotypes of Bacillus thuringiensis [J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 1974, 28: 129-132．
[21].丁照鑫,王涵祎,曹利娟,等. 苏云金芽孢杆菌Vip3Aa10 毒素结合肽的筛选及活性测定[J]。中国农业科学, 2015, 48(18):3627-3634.
[22].Melo AL, Soccol VT, Soccol CR. Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review [J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2016; 36(2):317-326.
[23].Boonserm P, Davis P, Ellar DJ, et al. Crystal structure of the mosquito-larvicidal toxin Cry4Ba and its biological implications [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2005, 348(2):363-382.
[24].Carroll J, Convents D, Van Damme J, et al. Intramolecular proteolytic cleavage of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A δ-endotoxin may facilitate its Coleopteran Toxicity [J]. Journal of invertebrate pathology, 1997, 70:41-49.
[25].Yamaguchi T, Sahara K, Bando H, et al. Intramolecular proteolytic nicking and binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8Da toxin in BBMVs of Japanese beetle [J]. Journal of invertebrate pathology, 2010, 105(3):243-247.

Cry1Ac毒素突变体的构建、表达及杀虫活性测定

The Construction, Expression and Insecticidal Activity Determination of Cry1Ac Toxin Mutant

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	陈和敏, 肖文芳, 陈和明, 吕复兵, 朱根发, 李宗艳, 李佐. 基于CiteSpace的兰花保鲜研究进展及可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 151-164.
[2]	刘鹏, 吴巧花, 舒惠理, 周莉荫, 王小东. 油茶对胁迫因子的响应机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 24-28.
[3]	李星星, 韩芳, 周雪, 苏乐平, 袁宏安. 富硒谷子研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 1-6.
[4]	闫蕴韬, 何兮, 张海清, 贺记外. 水稻种子耐贮性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 1-8.
[5]	颜越, 金荷仙, 王丽娴. 国内外社区花园健康效益研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(34): 68-75.
[6]	张婷婷, 马贵龙, 谢晓宝, 高新馨, 蔡奇. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌SX-45提取物对人参根腐病菌抑菌机理研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 124-131.
[7]	杨武广, 王君, 温凯, 仇景涛. 中国稻鳖共作技术研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 12-16.
[8]	王晴, 方文生, 李园, 王秋霞, 颜冬冬, 曹坳程. 杀线虫剂新品种及作用机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(30): 100-107.
[9]	麻磊, 黄晓君, Ganbat Dashzebegd, Mungunkhuyag Ariunaad, Tsagaantsooj Nanzadd, Altanchimeg Dorjsuren, 包刚, 佟斯琴, 包玉海, Enkhnasan Davaadorj. 不同遥感传感器监测森林虫害研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 91-99.
[10]	韩旭晨, 董岩, 韩豪杰, 谭艳平, 刘学群, 刘新琼, 徐鑫, 李开, 王春台. 鄂西南地区稻瘟病菌AVR-Pia动态变化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(21): 112-121.
[11]	张炜, 杨居东, 谭龙, 郭盛磊, 孙阎. 双鸭山市岭东区药用植物资源调查及区系分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(19): 77-85.
[12]	厉雅华, 张向前, 安祺, 武迪, 刘战勇, 孙峰, 张德健, 高敏, 张国英, 邢俊. 耕地地力评价方法及实践应用研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15): 60-68.
[13]	彭婵, 张新叶, 刘宗坤, 马林江, 陈慧玲. 石斛属植物SSR分子标记的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(13): 36-40.
[14]	梁婕, 王辉, 睢宁. 伞形科根茎类药用植物早期抽薹的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(13): 90-95.
[15]	陈芳玲, 樊娅萍, 贺苗苗, 王倡宪. 丛枝菌根真菌在药用植物上的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(12): 55-60.