Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 30-36.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0190
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-02-26
Revised:
2021-05-28
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-02-25
Contact:
LI Fusheng
E-mail:qingtian@163.com;zhenz@gxu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
LUO Hui, LI Fusheng. Water and Nitrogen Coupling Effects and Model Under Tomato Drip Irrigation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 30-36.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0190
处理 | N基肥比例 | 各生育期追施N比例/% | 各生育期灌水量/mm | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 | 开花期 | 果实膨大期 | 果实成熟期 | 苗期 | 开花期 | 果实膨大期 | 果实成熟期 | |||||||||||
10-25 | 11-5 | 11-12 | 11-20 | 11-27 | 12-4 | 12-12 | 12-20 | 12-30 | 11-5 | 11-12 | 11-20 | 11-27 | 12-4 | 12-12 | 12-20 | 12-30 | ||
F0W0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 0 | 47.5 | 0 | 45.6 | 0 | |
F1W1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57.3 | 60.1 | 63.2 | 59.4 | 64.2 | 58.5 | 64.7 | 61.6 | |
F2W1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 57.3 | 60.1 | 63.2 | 59.4 | 64.2 | 58.5 | 64.7 | 61.6 | |
F2W2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 | |
F3W2 | 40 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 | |
F4W1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 57.3 | 60.1 | 63.2 | 59.4 | 64.2 | 58.5 | 64.7 | 61.6 | |
F4W2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 | |
F5W2 | 40 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 |
处理 | N基肥比例 | 各生育期追施N比例/% | 各生育期灌水量/mm | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 | 开花期 | 果实膨大期 | 果实成熟期 | 苗期 | 开花期 | 果实膨大期 | 果实成熟期 | |||||||||||
10-25 | 11-5 | 11-12 | 11-20 | 11-27 | 12-4 | 12-12 | 12-20 | 12-30 | 11-5 | 11-12 | 11-20 | 11-27 | 12-4 | 12-12 | 12-20 | 12-30 | ||
F0W0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 0 | 47.5 | 0 | 45.6 | 0 | |
F1W1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57.3 | 60.1 | 63.2 | 59.4 | 64.2 | 58.5 | 64.7 | 61.6 | |
F2W1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 57.3 | 60.1 | 63.2 | 59.4 | 64.2 | 58.5 | 64.7 | 61.6 | |
F2W2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 | |
F3W2 | 40 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 | |
F4W1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 57.3 | 60.1 | 63.2 | 59.4 | 64.2 | 58.5 | 64.7 | 61.6 | |
F4W2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 | |
F5W2 | 40 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 45.8 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 47.5 | 51.4 | 46.8 | 51.8 | 49.3 |
处理 | 果实 含水率/% | 果型指数 | 果实硬度 | 番茄红素/ (mg/100 g) | 维生素C/ (mg/100 g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 水溶 性糖/% | 有机酸/% | 糖酸比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F0W0 | 91.0±0.4a | 0.87±0.03a | 5.4±0.4b | 9.5±1.3a | 18.1±2e | 7.3±0.3a | 5.1±0.6c | 0.45±0.04a | 11.6±1.4d |
F1W1 | 91.6±0.9a | 0.87±0.02a | 6.2±0.3ab | 9.8±0.3a | 19.8±0.6de | 8.0±0.1a | 5.2±0.1c | 0.26±0.02b | 20.0±1.3bc |
F2W1 | 92.2±0.4a | 0.88±0.02a | 6.0±0.4b | 9.8±0.9a | 22.2±1.2bcd | 7.6±0.4a | 6.4±0.4a | 0.30±0.03b | 21.6±2.6ab |
F2W2 | 92.3±0.6a | 0.88±0.03a | 5.7±0.4b | 9.7±0.9a | 25.8±2.1a | 7.9±0.4a | 6.3±0.5ab | 0.24±0.03b | 26.9±5.3a |
F3W2 | 91.3±0.9a | 0.88±0.01a | 6.3±0.8ab | 10.1±2.5a | 24.3±1.6ab | 8.0±0.3a | 5.9±0.2abc | 0.40±0.07a | 15.0±2.5cd |
F4W1 | 92.1±1.2a | 0.89±0.03a | 6.4±0.7ab | 9.6±1.6a | 21.1±2cd | 7.3±0.3a | 5.5±0.5bc | 0.30±0.03b | 18.4±3.1bc |
F4W2 | 91.3±0.8a | 0.88±0.03a | 7.3±0.6a | 8.7±1.0a | 23.8±1.5abc | 7.4±0.7a | 5.9±0.7abc | 0.29±0.05b | 20.7±4.3bc |
F5W2 | 92.0±0.9a | 0.86±0.04a | 6.5±0.7ab | 10.5±2.2a | 21.1±1.0cd | 7.2±0.5a | 5.7±0.2abc | 0.31±0.04b | 18.1±2.8bc |
显著性检验(P值) | 0.352 | 0.896 | 0.039 | 0.913 | <0.001 | 0.110 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
处理 | 果实 含水率/% | 果型指数 | 果实硬度 | 番茄红素/ (mg/100 g) | 维生素C/ (mg/100 g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 水溶 性糖/% | 有机酸/% | 糖酸比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F0W0 | 91.0±0.4a | 0.87±0.03a | 5.4±0.4b | 9.5±1.3a | 18.1±2e | 7.3±0.3a | 5.1±0.6c | 0.45±0.04a | 11.6±1.4d |
F1W1 | 91.6±0.9a | 0.87±0.02a | 6.2±0.3ab | 9.8±0.3a | 19.8±0.6de | 8.0±0.1a | 5.2±0.1c | 0.26±0.02b | 20.0±1.3bc |
F2W1 | 92.2±0.4a | 0.88±0.02a | 6.0±0.4b | 9.8±0.9a | 22.2±1.2bcd | 7.6±0.4a | 6.4±0.4a | 0.30±0.03b | 21.6±2.6ab |
F2W2 | 92.3±0.6a | 0.88±0.03a | 5.7±0.4b | 9.7±0.9a | 25.8±2.1a | 7.9±0.4a | 6.3±0.5ab | 0.24±0.03b | 26.9±5.3a |
F3W2 | 91.3±0.9a | 0.88±0.01a | 6.3±0.8ab | 10.1±2.5a | 24.3±1.6ab | 8.0±0.3a | 5.9±0.2abc | 0.40±0.07a | 15.0±2.5cd |
F4W1 | 92.1±1.2a | 0.89±0.03a | 6.4±0.7ab | 9.6±1.6a | 21.1±2cd | 7.3±0.3a | 5.5±0.5bc | 0.30±0.03b | 18.4±3.1bc |
F4W2 | 91.3±0.8a | 0.88±0.03a | 7.3±0.6a | 8.7±1.0a | 23.8±1.5abc | 7.4±0.7a | 5.9±0.7abc | 0.29±0.05b | 20.7±4.3bc |
F5W2 | 92.0±0.9a | 0.86±0.04a | 6.5±0.7ab | 10.5±2.2a | 21.1±1.0cd | 7.2±0.5a | 5.7±0.2abc | 0.31±0.04b | 18.1±2.8bc |
显著性检验(P值) | 0.352 | 0.896 | 0.039 | 0.913 | <0.001 | 0.110 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
处理 | 产量 | 耗水量 | 水分利用 效率 | 氮肥偏 生产力 | 果实 含水率 | 果型指数 | 果实硬度 | 番茄红素 | 维生素C | 可溶性 固形物 | 水溶性糖 | 有机酸 | 糖酸比 | d+ | d- | CI | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F0W0 | 0.27951 | 0.30697 | 0.31296 | 0.27947 | 0.35075 | 0.35101 | 0.30558 | 0.34539 | 0.28889 | 0.33987 | 0.31267 | 0.48870 | 0.21024 | 0.03264 | 0.00835 | 0.20366 | 8 |
F1W1 | 0.33102 | 0.40362 | 0.28187 | 0.33109 | 0.35307 | 0.35101 | 0.35085 | 0.35630 | 0.31602 | 0.37246 | 0.31880 | 0.28236 | 0.36248 | 0.01907 | 0.02081 | 0.52184 | 5 |
F2W1 | 0.34780 | 0.40362 | 0.29605 | 0.34786 | 0.35538 | 0.35505 | 0.33953 | 0.35630 | 0.35433 | 0.35383 | 0.39236 | 0.32580 | 0.39147 | 0.01627 | 0.02150 | 0.56928 | 4 |
F2W2 | 0.36007 | 0.32290 | 0.38337 | 0.36005 | 0.35577 | 0.35505 | 0.32255 | 0.35266 | 0.41179 | 0.36780 | 0.38623 | 0.26064 | 0.48753 | 0.01255 | 0.02958 | 0.70222 | 1 |
F3W2 | 0.39637 | 0.32290 | 0.42193 | 0.39633 | 0.35191 | 0.35505 | 0.35651 | 0.36720 | 0.38785 | 0.37246 | 0.36171 | 0.43440 | 0.27186 | 0.02232 | 0.01921 | 0.46260 | 7 |
F4W1 | 0.34428 | 0.40362 | 0.29306 | 0.34428 | 0.35499 | 0.35908 | 0.36217 | 0.34903 | 0.33677 | 0.33987 | 0.33719 | 0.32580 | 0.33348 | 0.01786 | 0.01944 | 0.52120 | 6 |
F4W2 | 0.36818 | 0.32290 | 0.39183 | 0.36822 | 0.35191 | 0.35505 | 0.41310 | 0.31631 | 0.37987 | 0.34452 | 0.36171 | 0.31494 | 0.37516 | 0.01263 | 0.02429 | 0.65788 | 2 |
F5W2 | 0.38793 | 0.32290 | 0.41297 | 0.38787 | 0.35461 | 0.34698 | 0.36783 | 0.38175 | 0.33677 | 0.33521 | 0.34945 | 0.33666 | 0.32804 | 0.01578 | 0.02200 | 0.58227 | 3 |
A+ | 0.02832 | 0.02198 | 0.02990 | 0.02831 | 0.02563 | 0.02587 | 0.02962 | 0.02746 | 0.02938 | 0.02679 | 0.02811 | 0.01847 | 0.01470 | ||||
A- | 0.01997 | 0.02889 | 0.01998 | 0.01996 | 0.02527 | 0.02500 | 0.02191 | 0.02275 | 0.02061 | 0.02411 | 0.02240 | 0.03463 | 0.03408 | ||||
R | 0.671 | -0.079 | 0.329 | 0.671 | 0.656 | 0.220 | 0.520 | 0.162 | 0.741* | 0.211 | 0.689 | -0.878** | 0.892** |
处理 | 产量 | 耗水量 | 水分利用 效率 | 氮肥偏 生产力 | 果实 含水率 | 果型指数 | 果实硬度 | 番茄红素 | 维生素C | 可溶性 固形物 | 水溶性糖 | 有机酸 | 糖酸比 | d+ | d- | CI | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F0W0 | 0.27951 | 0.30697 | 0.31296 | 0.27947 | 0.35075 | 0.35101 | 0.30558 | 0.34539 | 0.28889 | 0.33987 | 0.31267 | 0.48870 | 0.21024 | 0.03264 | 0.00835 | 0.20366 | 8 |
F1W1 | 0.33102 | 0.40362 | 0.28187 | 0.33109 | 0.35307 | 0.35101 | 0.35085 | 0.35630 | 0.31602 | 0.37246 | 0.31880 | 0.28236 | 0.36248 | 0.01907 | 0.02081 | 0.52184 | 5 |
F2W1 | 0.34780 | 0.40362 | 0.29605 | 0.34786 | 0.35538 | 0.35505 | 0.33953 | 0.35630 | 0.35433 | 0.35383 | 0.39236 | 0.32580 | 0.39147 | 0.01627 | 0.02150 | 0.56928 | 4 |
F2W2 | 0.36007 | 0.32290 | 0.38337 | 0.36005 | 0.35577 | 0.35505 | 0.32255 | 0.35266 | 0.41179 | 0.36780 | 0.38623 | 0.26064 | 0.48753 | 0.01255 | 0.02958 | 0.70222 | 1 |
F3W2 | 0.39637 | 0.32290 | 0.42193 | 0.39633 | 0.35191 | 0.35505 | 0.35651 | 0.36720 | 0.38785 | 0.37246 | 0.36171 | 0.43440 | 0.27186 | 0.02232 | 0.01921 | 0.46260 | 7 |
F4W1 | 0.34428 | 0.40362 | 0.29306 | 0.34428 | 0.35499 | 0.35908 | 0.36217 | 0.34903 | 0.33677 | 0.33987 | 0.33719 | 0.32580 | 0.33348 | 0.01786 | 0.01944 | 0.52120 | 6 |
F4W2 | 0.36818 | 0.32290 | 0.39183 | 0.36822 | 0.35191 | 0.35505 | 0.41310 | 0.31631 | 0.37987 | 0.34452 | 0.36171 | 0.31494 | 0.37516 | 0.01263 | 0.02429 | 0.65788 | 2 |
F5W2 | 0.38793 | 0.32290 | 0.41297 | 0.38787 | 0.35461 | 0.34698 | 0.36783 | 0.38175 | 0.33677 | 0.33521 | 0.34945 | 0.33666 | 0.32804 | 0.01578 | 0.02200 | 0.58227 | 3 |
A+ | 0.02832 | 0.02198 | 0.02990 | 0.02831 | 0.02563 | 0.02587 | 0.02962 | 0.02746 | 0.02938 | 0.02679 | 0.02811 | 0.01847 | 0.01470 | ||||
A- | 0.01997 | 0.02889 | 0.01998 | 0.01996 | 0.02527 | 0.02500 | 0.02191 | 0.02275 | 0.02061 | 0.02411 | 0.02240 | 0.03463 | 0.03408 | ||||
R | 0.671 | -0.079 | 0.329 | 0.671 | 0.656 | 0.220 | 0.520 | 0.162 | 0.741* | 0.211 | 0.689 | -0.878** | 0.892** |
[1] | 康绍忠, 张建华, 梁宗锁, 等. 控制性交替灌溉一种新的农田节水调控思路[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1997, 15(1):4-9. |
[2] | 唐汉, 王金武, 徐常塑, 等. 化肥减施增效关键技术研究进展分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(4):1-19. |
[3] |
FU F B, LI F S, KANG S Z. Alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation improves water-and nitrogen-use efficiencies of sweet-waxy maize with nitrogen fertigation[J]. Scientific reports, 2017, 7:17256.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17560-2 URL |
[4] |
LUO H, LI F S. Tomato yield, quality and water use efficiency under different drip fertigation strategies[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2018, 23(5):181-188.
doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(84)90022-0 URL |
[5] | LIU R, YANG Y, WANG Y S, et al. Alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation with nitrogen fertigation promoted tomato growth, water and fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Agricultural water management, 2020, 233:1-8. |
[6] | 胡晓辉, 高子星, 马永博, 等. 基于产量品质及水肥利用率的袋培辣椒水肥耦合方案[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(17):81-89. |
[7] | 邢英英, 张富仓, 张燕, 等. 滴灌施肥水肥耦合对温室番茄产量、品质和水氮利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(4):713-726. |
[8] | 刘中良, 谷端银, 张艳艳, 等. 水氮因子耦合对日光温室基质栽培番茄品质、产量及水氮利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(2):111-119. |
[9] | 王超, TANKARI Moussa, 龚道枝, 等. 优质樱桃番茄高效水氮耦合管理[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(1):120-130. |
[10] | 李文玲, 孙西欢, 张建华, 等. 水氮耦合对膜下滴灌设施番茄水氮生产函数影响研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(1):47-54. |
[11] | 王贺辉, 赵恒, 高强, 等. 温室番茄滴灌灌水指标试验研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2005, 5:22-25. |
[12] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. |
[13] | 李合生, 孙群, 赵世杰, 等. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
[14] | 韩泽群, 姜波. 加工番茄品种多性状综合评价方法研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(2):357-365. |
[15] | 徐心诚. 主成分分析法对番茄品种耐弱光性的综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(4):135-140. |
[16] |
DENG H, YEH C H, WILLIS R J. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights[J]. Computers and operations research, 2000, 27(10):963-973.
doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6 URL |
[17] | WANG F, DU T S, QIU R J. Deficit irrigation scheduling of greenhouse tomato based on quality principle component analysis[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(1):75-80. |
[18] | KUO T. A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index[J]. European journal of operational rese, 2017, 260:152-160. |
[19] |
ZHAO D, WANG Z H, ZHANG J Z, et al. Improving yield and quality of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) using alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in arid Northwest China[J]. Water, 2019, 11(7):1503-1503.
doi: 10.3390/w11071503 URL |
[20] | 刘学娜, 刘彬彬, 崔青青, 等. 交替滴灌施氮对日光温室黄瓜生长、光合特性、产量及水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(6):905-916. |
[21] | 李洪任, 卢江海, 邢文刚, 等. 根系分区交替滴灌周期对番茄产量品质及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2015, 5:34-41. |
[22] |
WANG J W, LI Y, NIU W Q. Deficit Alternate Drip Irrigation Increased Root-Soil-Plant Interaction, Tomato Yield, and Quality[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(3):781-789.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030781 URL |
[23] | 商美新, 房增国, 梁斌, 等. 不同水氮处理对膜下滴灌马铃薯产量、品质及土壤硝态氮运移的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(6):118-125. |
[24] | 赵娣, 王振华, 李文昊, 等. 分根区交替灌溉对膜下滴灌加工番茄根系特征及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(10):2069-2079. |
[25] |
WANG Z, LIU Z, ZHANG Z, et al. Subsurface drip irrigation scheduling for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in solar greenhouse based on 20cm standard pan evaporation in Northeast China[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2009, 123(1):51-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.020 URL |
[26] |
ZHANG Q, WU S, CHEN C, et al. Regulation of nitrogen forms on growth of eggplant under partial root-zone irrigation[J]. Agricultural Water management, 2014, 142:56-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.04.015 URL |
[1] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. |
[2] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. |
[3] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. |
[4] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[5] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[6] | MA Meng, WANG Kehua, QU Liang, DOU Taocun, GUO Jun, WANG Xingguo, HU Yuping, LU Jian. Determination and Analysis of Slaughter Performance, Chest Muscle Quality and Composition of Different Chicken Breeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 137-142. |
[7] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[8] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[9] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[10] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[11] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. |
[12] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[13] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[14] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[15] | LU Lilan, WANG Yuping, YIN Xinxing, HUANG Yingkai, FAN Haikuo. Investigation and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Fruit Coconut Orchards in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||