Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (19): 13-17.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190400034
Special Issue: 玉米
Previous Articles Next Articles
Tian Yanhong, Yan Fengchao, Li Peng, Zhao Xiaofeng
Received:
2019-04-23
Revised:
2019-05-24
Online:
2020-07-05
Published:
2020-07-08
CLC Number:
Tian Yanhong, Yan Fengchao, Li Peng, Zhao Xiaofeng. Different Organic Fertilizer Quantities Affect the Growth and Yield of Maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(19): 13-17.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190400034
处理 | 株高 | 茎粗 |
---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 129.09±1.10a | 2.83±0.04 |
有机肥2.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 127.81±1.82ab | 2.85±0.05 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2 | 122.09±2.97b | 2.60±0.07 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 128.75±0.81a | 2.77±0.06 |
有机肥15 t/hm2 | 125.56±0.88ab | 2.74±0.07 |
有机肥15 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 127.78±1.28ab | 2.79±0.09 |
有机肥30 t/hm2 | 127.06±2.07ab | 2.82±0.05 |
有机肥37.5 t/hm2 | 125.50±0.56ab | 2.77±0.11 |
处理 | 株高 | 茎粗 |
---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 129.09±1.10a | 2.83±0.04 |
有机肥2.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 127.81±1.82ab | 2.85±0.05 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2 | 122.09±2.97b | 2.60±0.07 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 128.75±0.81a | 2.77±0.06 |
有机肥15 t/hm2 | 125.56±0.88ab | 2.74±0.07 |
有机肥15 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 127.78±1.28ab | 2.79±0.09 |
有机肥30 t/hm2 | 127.06±2.07ab | 2.82±0.05 |
有机肥37.5 t/hm2 | 125.50±0.56ab | 2.77±0.11 |
处理 | 7月21日 | 7月25日 | 7月29日 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50%抽雄率 | 100%抽雄率 | 合计 | 50%抽雄率 | 100%抽雄率 | 合计 | 100%抽雄率 | |||
常规施肥 | 31.3±1.3 | 25.0±0.7 | 56.3±0.7aA | 12.5±0.7 | 87.5±1.2 | 100.0±1.8aA | 100.0±2.1a | ||
有机肥2.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 32.4±0.5 | 12.5±0.6 | 44.9±1.1bB | 12.4±0.4 | 82.6±1.7 | 95.0±2.1aAB | 100.0±1.8a | ||
有机肥7.5 t/hm2 | 37.4±2.0 | 0.0 | 37.4±2.0bcB | 50.0±1.7 | 31.3±2.1 | 81.3±0.4bB | 87.5±1.3b | ||
有机肥7.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 31.3±2.9 | 12.3±1.1 | 43.6±1.8bB | 18.5±0.5 | 81.3±1.5 | 99.8±1.0aA | 100.0±1.4a | ||
有机肥15 t/hm2 | 38.8±2.3 | 0.0 | 38.8±2.3bcB | 50.0±2.4 | 43.8±0.8 | 93.8±3.2aAB | 93.8±2.0ab | ||
有机肥15 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 43.8±2.1 | 12.5±1.7 | 56.3±3.8aA | 31.3±0.4 | 68.2±3.9 | 99.5±3.3aA | 100.0±0.9a | ||
有机肥30 t/hm2 | 37.5±1.1 | 0.0 | 37.5±1.1bcB | 25.0±1.4 | 72.0±0.2 | 97.0±1.5aA | 93.8±1.4ab | ||
有机肥37.5 t/hm2 | 32.5±2.0 | 2.3±0.3 | 34.8±1.7cB | 25.0±1.9 | 72.3±1.7 | 97.3±3.6aA | 93.8±2.2ab |
处理 | 7月21日 | 7月25日 | 7月29日 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50%抽雄率 | 100%抽雄率 | 合计 | 50%抽雄率 | 100%抽雄率 | 合计 | 100%抽雄率 | |||
常规施肥 | 31.3±1.3 | 25.0±0.7 | 56.3±0.7aA | 12.5±0.7 | 87.5±1.2 | 100.0±1.8aA | 100.0±2.1a | ||
有机肥2.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 32.4±0.5 | 12.5±0.6 | 44.9±1.1bB | 12.4±0.4 | 82.6±1.7 | 95.0±2.1aAB | 100.0±1.8a | ||
有机肥7.5 t/hm2 | 37.4±2.0 | 0.0 | 37.4±2.0bcB | 50.0±1.7 | 31.3±2.1 | 81.3±0.4bB | 87.5±1.3b | ||
有机肥7.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 31.3±2.9 | 12.3±1.1 | 43.6±1.8bB | 18.5±0.5 | 81.3±1.5 | 99.8±1.0aA | 100.0±1.4a | ||
有机肥15 t/hm2 | 38.8±2.3 | 0.0 | 38.8±2.3bcB | 50.0±2.4 | 43.8±0.8 | 93.8±3.2aAB | 93.8±2.0ab | ||
有机肥15 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 43.8±2.1 | 12.5±1.7 | 56.3±3.8aA | 31.3±0.4 | 68.2±3.9 | 99.5±3.3aA | 100.0±0.9a | ||
有机肥30 t/hm2 | 37.5±1.1 | 0.0 | 37.5±1.1bcB | 25.0±1.4 | 72.0±0.2 | 97.0±1.5aA | 93.8±1.4ab | ||
有机肥37.5 t/hm2 | 32.5±2.0 | 2.3±0.3 | 34.8±1.7cB | 25.0±1.9 | 72.3±1.7 | 97.3±3.6aA | 93.8±2.2ab |
处理 | 穗长/cm | 秃尖/cm | 轴粗/cm | 行数 | 行粒数 | 百粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 21.7±0.5b | 0.72±0.12a | 4.9±0.06 | 14±0.3 | 43±1.1a | 39.9±0.6 | 13113.6±100.1aA | — |
有机肥2.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 19.7±0.5ab | 0.83±0.19a | 4.6±0.08 | 14±0.3 | 37±1.4b | 35.3±2.0 | 11972.7±93.1bcB | -8.70 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2 | 17.6±0.4a | 1.11±0.17b | 4.6±0.06 | 14±0.4 | 34±1.0b | 34.6 ±0.5 | 11723.6±93.8cB | -10.60 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 21.0±0.3b | 0.74±0.11a | 4.8±0.07 | 14±0.3 | 39±1.1ab | 37.5±0.5 | 12248.1±93.0bB | -6.60 |
有机肥15 t/hm2 | 17.7±0.4a | 1.23±0.17b | 4.6±0.05 | 14±0.2 | 33±0.9b | 34.8±0.4 | 11907.2±84.5bcB | -9.21 |
有机肥15 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 20.5±0.6b | 0.71±0.10a | 4.8±0.07 | 14±0.3 | 39±1.4ab | 39.1±1.4 | 12326.8±58.9bB | -6.03 |
有机肥30 t/hm2 | 18.6±0.4ab | 1.05±0.17b | 4.6±0.09 | 13±0.4 | 35±0.9b | 34.8±0.7 | 12064.5±93.7bcB | -8.07 |
有机肥37.5 t/hm2 | 19.0±0.6ab | 1.08±0.13b | 4.7±0.06 | 14±0.3 | 37±1.4b | 37.6±1.7 | 12103.9±69.2bcB | -7.69 |
处理 | 穗长/cm | 秃尖/cm | 轴粗/cm | 行数 | 行粒数 | 百粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 21.7±0.5b | 0.72±0.12a | 4.9±0.06 | 14±0.3 | 43±1.1a | 39.9±0.6 | 13113.6±100.1aA | — |
有机肥2.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 19.7±0.5ab | 0.83±0.19a | 4.6±0.08 | 14±0.3 | 37±1.4b | 35.3±2.0 | 11972.7±93.1bcB | -8.70 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2 | 17.6±0.4a | 1.11±0.17b | 4.6±0.06 | 14±0.4 | 34±1.0b | 34.6 ±0.5 | 11723.6±93.8cB | -10.60 |
有机肥7.5 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 21.0±0.3b | 0.74±0.11a | 4.8±0.07 | 14±0.3 | 39±1.1ab | 37.5±0.5 | 12248.1±93.0bB | -6.60 |
有机肥15 t/hm2 | 17.7±0.4a | 1.23±0.17b | 4.6±0.05 | 14±0.2 | 33±0.9b | 34.8±0.4 | 11907.2±84.5bcB | -9.21 |
有机肥15 t/hm2+50%常规施肥 | 20.5±0.6b | 0.71±0.10a | 4.8±0.07 | 14±0.3 | 39±1.4ab | 39.1±1.4 | 12326.8±58.9bB | -6.03 |
有机肥30 t/hm2 | 18.6±0.4ab | 1.05±0.17b | 4.6±0.09 | 13±0.4 | 35±0.9b | 34.8±0.7 | 12064.5±93.7bcB | -8.07 |
有机肥37.5 t/hm2 | 19.0±0.6ab | 1.08±0.13b | 4.7±0.06 | 14±0.3 | 37±1.4b | 37.6±1.7 | 12103.9±69.2bcB | -7.69 |
处理 | 穗长/cm | 秃尖/cm | 轴粗/cm | 行数 | 行粒数 | 百粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 19.3±0.3 | 0.65±0.11 | 4.89±0.03 | 15±0.22 | 36±1.2 | 38.3±0.6 | 12442.3±20.4a | — |
有机肥20 t/hm2+底肥 | 20.9±0.3 | 0.40±0.12 | 4.82±0.04 | 14±0.25 | 38±2.1 | 38.1±0.4 | 12711.5±109.8ab | 2.16 |
有机肥30 t/hm2+底肥 | 20.7±0.3 | 0.35±0.06 | 4.89±0.03 | 14±0.20 | 38±1.1 | 39.2±0.5 | 13004.4±86.6b | 4.53 |
有机肥40 t/hm2+底肥 | 21.3±0.4 | 0.39±0.09 | 4.92±0.04 | 14±0.25 | 39±1.4 | 38.9±0.7 | 12457.1±94.1a | 0.1 |
处理 | 穗长/cm | 秃尖/cm | 轴粗/cm | 行数 | 行粒数 | 百粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | 19.3±0.3 | 0.65±0.11 | 4.89±0.03 | 15±0.22 | 36±1.2 | 38.3±0.6 | 12442.3±20.4a | — |
有机肥20 t/hm2+底肥 | 20.9±0.3 | 0.40±0.12 | 4.82±0.04 | 14±0.25 | 38±2.1 | 38.1±0.4 | 12711.5±109.8ab | 2.16 |
有机肥30 t/hm2+底肥 | 20.7±0.3 | 0.35±0.06 | 4.89±0.03 | 14±0.20 | 38±1.1 | 39.2±0.5 | 13004.4±86.6b | 4.53 |
有机肥40 t/hm2+底肥 | 21.3±0.4 | 0.39±0.09 | 4.92±0.04 | 14±0.25 | 39±1.4 | 38.9±0.7 | 12457.1±94.1a | 0.1 |
[1] | 张欣, 施利利, 刘晓宇, 等. 不同施肥处理对水稻产量、食味品质及蛋白质组分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(4):104-108. |
[2] | 张国荣, 李菊梅, 徐明岗, 等. 长期不同施肥对水稻产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(2):543-551. |
[3] |
谢军, 赵亚男, 陈轩敬, 等. 有机肥氮替代化肥氮提高玉米产量和氮素吸收利用效率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(20):3934-3943.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.008 URL |
[4] | 刑月华, 包红静, 蔡广兴, 等. 连续施用不同量有机肥对土壤肥力及玉米产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016,45(4):66-70. |
[5] | 杨晶. 畜禽粪便有机肥技术的应用及效益分析[J]. 环境与发展, 2014,26(4):82-84. |
[6] | 汪吉东, 张辉, 张永春, 等. 连续施用不同比例鸡粪氮对水稻土有机质积累及土壤酸化的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(5):1178-1185. |
[7] | 孟庆英, 于忠和, 贾绘彬, 等. 不同施肥处理对大豆根际土壤微生物及土壤肥力影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2011,30(3):471-474. |
[8] | 焦晓光, 魏丹, 隋跃宇. 长期培肥对农田黑土土壤微生物量碳、氮的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(3):1-3. |
[9] | 侯小畔, 安婷婷, 周亚男, 等. 增施有机肥对夏玉米物质生产及土壤特性的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2018,26(1):127-133. |
[10] | 王立刚, 李维炯, 邱建军, 等. 生物有机肥对作物生长、土壤肥力及产量的效应研究[J]. 土壤肥料, 2004(5):12-16. |
[11] | 高菊生, 黄晶, 董春华, 等. 长期有机无机配施对水稻产量及土壤有效养分的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2014,51(2):314-324. |
[12] | 张发明, 毛昆明, 刘宏斌, 等. 不同量有机肥与化肥配施对水稻氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2011,26(5):694-699. |
[13] |
朱菜红, 董彩霞, 沈其荣, 等. 配施有机肥提高化肥氮利用效率的微生物作用机制研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(2):282-288.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2010.0204 URL |
[14] | 梁元振, 仝利朋, 吴德亮, 等. 有机无机肥配施对土壤硝态氮、玉米产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2017,25(4):111-116. |
[15] | 夏雪, 谷洁, 高华, 等. 有机肥无机肥配施对玉米生长期土壤水解酶活性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010,3, 28(2):38-42. |
[16] | 朱兆良. 中国土壤氮素研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):778-783. |
[17] | 朱平, 彭畅, 高洪军, 等. 长期培肥对土壤肥力及玉米产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2009,17(6):105-108. |
[18] | 郝小雨, 高伟, 王玉军, 等. 有机无机肥料配合施用对设施番茄产量、品质及土壤硝态氮淋失的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012,31(3):538-547. |
[19] | 祝英, 王治业, 彭轶楠, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对土壤肥力和微生物特征的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2015, 10, 46(5):1161-1167. |
[20] | 刁生鹏, 高宇, 张雄, 等. 有机肥施用对玉米生长发育及水分利用的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2018,46(4):58-63. |
[1] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[2] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[3] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[4] | JI Kun, WANG Bin, ZHAO Bowen, XUE Hao, WU Jianmin, ZHU Xiaojian, WANG Yixin, ZHAO Haijun, HAN Zanping. Different Maize Germplasm Materials: Grey Correlation Analysis of Plant and Ear-kernel Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 27-32. |
[5] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[6] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[7] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[8] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[9] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[10] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[11] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[12] | LIU Xiaohang, MA Shuqing, ZHAO Jing, QUAN Hujie, DENG Kuicai, CHAI Qingrong. Yield Response of Japonica Rice of Northeast China to Low Temperature in Different Time Periods of Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 91-98. |
[13] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
[14] | NIU Liya, WANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, WANG Zhi, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Wei, YU Liang. Wheat Quality and Yield Traits: Effects on Scores of Steamed Bread and Noodles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 129-133. |
[15] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHOU Miaoping, ZHANG Peng. Analysis of Yield and Its Components of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 15-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||