VOSviewer-Based Visual Analysis on Research Status of Phyllosphere Microorganisms

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0663

Abstract

Abstract:

Through the analysis and comparison of domestic and foreign research fields of phyllosphere microorganisms, the research status and hotspots of phyllosphere microorganisms were clarified, and the reference for further research in this field was provided. This paper adopted bibliometric analysis method and the visual analysis tool VOSviewer to conduct correlation analysis on 114 literature included in CNKI and 521 literature included in the Web of Science core collection database. The annual publication volume in the field of phyllosphere microorganisms generally showed an upward trend, and the annual average number of English articles was higher than that of Chinese articles, with the United States, China and Germany ranking at the forefront. Among them, China and Australia cooperated most closely, and the United States collaborated most with other countries. Among research institutions, the Chinese Academy of Sciences published the most papers and cooperated more with other research institutions. Bai Zhihui (Bai Z H) published the most papers in this field, and the teams of the authors cooperated closely. Although there was close cooperation between the teams of Bai ZhiHui and Jin Decai (Jin D C) in the English literature, on the whole, there was still a lack of cooperation between the teams in both Chinese and English literature. As for phyllosphere microorganisms, studies have been carried out on their community structure and diversity, and related papers can be found in CNKI and WOS. At present, the Chinese literature only tends to explore the role of phyllosphere microorganisms in plant diseases, biological control and heavy metal pollution, while the English literature is more extensive and in-depth in discussing the interaction of phyllosphere microorganisms with plants, microorganisms and environment. In summary, the research on phyllosphere microorganisms is in its infancy, and the community structures and diversity of phyllosphere microorganism communities are the research hotspots and directions in this stage.

Key words: phyllosphere microorganisms, VOSviewer, bibliometrics, research status, CNKI, WOS

CLC Number:

S718.5，G353.1

WU Song, ZHOU Tian, YANG Libin, JIANG Yunbing, PAN Hong, LIU Yongzhi, DU Jun. VOSviewer-Based Visual Analysis on Research Status of Phyllosphere Microorganisms[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 142-150.

Figures/Tables 9

References 53

[1]	杨宽, 王慧玲, 叶坤浩, 等. 叶际微生物及与植物互作的研究进展[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 36(1):155-164.
[2]	MEYER K M, LEVEAU J H J. Microbiology of the phyllosphere: A playground for testing ecological concepts[J]. Oecologia, 2012, 168(3):621-629. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2138-2 pmid: 21983641
[3]	ANDREWS J H, HARRIS R F. The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces[J]. Annual review of phytopathol, 2000, 38(1):145-180. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.145 URL
[4]	LINDOW S E, BRANDL M T. Microbiology of the phyllosphere[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2003, 69(4):1875-1883. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003 pmid: 12676659
[5]	KADIVAR H, STAPLETON A E. Ultraviolet radiation alters maize phyllosphere bacterial diversity[J]. Microbial ecology, 2003, 45(4):353-361. pmid: 12704563
[6]	COPELAND J K, YUAN L J, LAYEGHIFARD M, et al. Seasonal community succession of the phyllosphere microbiome[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 2015, 28(3):274-285. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-14-0331-FI pmid: 25679538
[7]	FINKEL O M, BURCH A Y, LINDOW S E, et al. Geographical location determines the population structure in phyllosphere microbial communities of a salt-excreting desert tree[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011, 77(21):7647-7655. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05565-11 pmid: 21926212
[8]	GAO X N, SUN H, LIU R, et al. The impact of sugarcane brown rust and host resistance on the phyllosphere bacterial community[J]. Sugar Tech, 2022, 24(5):1420-1429. doi: 10.1007/s12355-021-01088-x URL
[9]	李慧娟. 青岛市3种植物叶表面颗粒物微形态及叶际细菌群落结构研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2021.
[10]	WAGI S, AHMED A. Phyllospheric plant growth promoting bacteria[J]. Journal of bacteriology & mycology, 2017, 5:215-216.
[11]	SALEEM M, MECKES N, PERVAIZ Z H, et al. Microbial interactions in the phyllosphere increase plant performance under herbivore biotic stress[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2017, 8:41. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00041 pmid: 28163703
[12]	张俊, 张华, 常畅, 等. 基于文献计量的凋落物研究现状及热点分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6):2166-2173.
[13]	赵飞, 艾春艳, 游越, 等. 基于文献计量开展高校科研评估的探索与思考——以北京大学科研竞争力评估为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(1):97-101.
[14]	王敏, 万长秀, 田苓华, 等. 基于CiteSpace的我国运动想象疗法的可视化分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(18):28-32.
[15]	高懋芳, 邱建军, 刘三超, 等. 基于文献计量的农业面源污染研究发展态势分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(6):1140-1150.
[16]	汪小飞, 张家伟, 刘铁宁, 等. 小麦抗倒伏研究动态追踪——基于WoS和CNKI数据库的文献计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5):132-142.
[17]	王堽, 路正禹, 郝王森, 等. 甜菜研究现状的CiteSpace计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(13):147-152.
[18]	李嘉慧. 基于文献计量学的国内外茶叶农药残留研究综述[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(10):148-157.
[19]	王敏, 张志强. 知识发现研究文献定量分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008(4):29-31,61.
[20]	杨永军. 基于Web of Science土壤微生物多样性领域文献计量分析[J]. 防护林科技, 2021(4):66-68,71.
[21]	向立刚, 汪汉成, 郑苹, 等. 一种未知真菌性叶斑病发病烟叶真菌群落分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(1):40-46.
[22]	刘天波, 滕凯, 周向平, 等. 拮抗菌群对烟草野火病的防治效果及叶际微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(8):2643-2652.
[23]	贾彤, 郭婷艳, 王瑞宏, 等. 铜尾矿白羊草重金属含量对叶际和根际真菌群落的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(11):5193-5200.
[24]	周之栋, 徐建华. 公路沿线不同植物叶际微生物群落结构及重金属污染比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(18):215-221.
[25]	RASTOGI G, SBODIO A, TECH J J, et al. Leaf microbiota in an agroecosystem: spatiotemporal variation in bacterial community composition on field-grown lettuce[J]. The ISME journal, 2012, 6(10):1812-1822. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.32 URL
[26]	PATI B R, CHANDRA A K. Diazotrophic bacterial population and other associated organisms on the phyllosphere of some crop plants[J]. Zentralblatt für mikrobiologie, 1993, 148(6):392-402. doi: 10.1016/S0232-4393(11)80304-5 URL
[27]	ARUN K D, SABARINATHAN K G, GOMATHY M, et al. Mitigation of drought stress in rice crop with plant growth-promoting abiotic stress-tolerant rice phyllosphere bacteria[J]. Journal of basic microbiology, 2020, 60(9):768-786.
[28]	SMEE M R, REAL-RAMIREZ I, ZULUAGA A C, et al. Epiphytic strains of Pseudomonas syringae kill diverse aphid species[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021, 87(11):e00017-e00021..
[29]	IBEKWE A M, SHOUSE P J, GRIEVE C M. Quantification of survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 on plants affected by contaminated irrigation water[J]. Engineering in life sciences, 2006, 6(6):566-572. doi: 10.1002/elsc.200620157 URL
[30]	XU N, QU Q, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Effects of residual S-metolachlor in soil on the phyllosphere microbial communities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020, 748:141342.
[31]	HU H, LI X, WU S, et al. Effects of long-term exposure to oxytetracycline on phytoremediation of swine wastewater via duckweed systems[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2021, 414:125508.
[32]	ZENG H, XU H, LIU G, et al. Physiological and metagenomic strategies uncover the rhizosphere bacterial microbiome succession underlying three common environmental stresses in cassava[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2021, 411:125143.
[33]	DU Y Y, ZHANG D W, ZHOU D G, et al. The growth of plants and indigenous bacterial community were significantly affected by cadmium contamination in soil-plant system[J]. AMB express, 2021, 11(1):1-13. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01157-6 URL
[34]	FRANZETTI A, GANDOLFI I, BESTETTI G, et al. Plant-microorganisms interaction promotes removal of air pollutants in Milan (Italy) urban area[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2020, 384:121021.
[35]	IMPERATO V, KOWALKOWSKI L, PORTILLO-ESTRADA M, et al. Characterisation of the Carpinus betulus L. phyllomicrobiome in urban and forest areas[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2019:1110.
[36]	MALITI C M, BASILE D V, CORPE W A. Effects of Methylobacterium spp. strains on rice Oryza sativa L. callus induction, plantlet regeneration, and seedlings growth in vitro[J]. The journal of the torrey botanical society, 2005, 132(2):355-367. doi: 10.3159/1095-5674(2005)132[355:EOMSSO]2.0.CO;2 URL
[37]	ZANG C, LIN Q, XIE J, et al. The biological control of the grapevine downy mildew disease using Ochrobactrum sp.[J]. Plant protection science, 2019, 56(1):52-61. doi: 10.17221/87/2019-PPS URL
[38]	WALLACE J, LAFOREST-LAPOINTE I, KEMBEL S W. Variation in the leaf and root microbiome of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) at an elevational range limit[J]. Peer J, 2018, 6(12):e5293. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5293 URL
[39]	NAYAK S, BEHERA S, DASH P K. Potential of microbial diversity of coastal sand dunes: need for exploration in Odisha Coast of India[J]. The scientific world journal, 2019:1-9.
[40]	BILLAR DE ALMEIDA A, CONCAS J, CAMPOS M D, et al. Endophytic fungi as potential biological control agents against grapevine trunk diseases in Alentejo Region[J]. Biology, 2020, 9(12):420. doi: 10.3390/biology9120420 URL
[41]	WANG H, ZHANG R, DUAN Y, et al. The endophytic strain Trichoderma asperellum 6S-2: An efficient biocontrol agent against apple replant disease in China and a potential plant-growth-promoting fungus[J]. Journal of fungi, 2021, 7(12):1050. doi: 10.3390/jof7121050 URL
[42]	YANG C H, CROWLEY D E, BORNEMAN J, et al. Microbial phyllosphere populations are more complex than previously realized[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(7):3889-3894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051633898 URL
[43]	GDANETZ K, NOEL Z, TRAIL F. Influence of plant host and organ, management strategy, and spore traits on microbiome composition[J]. Phytobiomes journal, 2021, 5(2):202-219. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-08-19-0045-R URL
[44]	IGUCHI H, SATO I, SAKAKIBARA M, et al. Distribution of methanotrophs in the phyllosphere[J]. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry, 2012:120281.
[45]	ALI N, SORKHOH N, SALAMAH S, et al. The potential of epiphytic hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria on legume leaves for attenuation of atmospheric hydrocarbon pollutants[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2012, 93(1):113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.014 pmid: 22054577
[46]	KEMBEL S W, O’CONNOR T K, ARNOLD H K, et al. Relationships between phyllosphere bacterial communities and plant functional traits in a neotropical forest[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111(38):13715-13720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216057111 URL
[47]	刘利玲, 李会琳, 蒙振思, 等. 青杨雌雄株叶际微生物群落多样性和结构的差异[J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(3):556-569.
[48]	WHIPPS J M, HAND P, PINK D, et al. Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype[J]. Journal of applied microbiology, 2008, 105(6):1744-1755. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03906.x pmid: 19120625
[49]	GOMES T, PEREIRA J A, BENHADI J, et al. Endophytic and epiphytic phyllosphere fungal communities are shaped by different environmental factors in a Mediterranean ecosystem[J]. Microbial ecology, 2018, 76(3):668-679. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1161-9 pmid: 29500493
[50]	HARROP B L, MARKS J C, WATWOOD M E. Early bacterial and fungal colonization of leaf litter in Fossil Creek, Arizona[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2009, 28(2):383-396. doi: 10.1899/08-068.1 URL
[51]	XU W, SHI L, CHAN O, et al. Assessing the effect of litter species on the dynamic of bacterial and fungal communities during leaf decomposition in microcosm by molecular techniques[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12):e84613.
[52]	TLÁSKAL V, VOŘÍŠKOVÁ J, BALDRIAN P. Bacterial succession on decomposing leaf litter exhibits a specific occurrence pattern of cellulolytic taxa and potential decomposers of fungal mycelia[J]. FEMS microbiology ecology, 2016, 92(11):fiw177. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw177 URL
[53]	VOŘÍŠKOVÁ J, BALDRIAN P. Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes[J]. ISME journal, 2013, 7(3):477-486. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.116 pmid: 23051693

高频关键词	频次	高频关键词	频次
叶际微生物	34	根际微生物	6
叶际	26	叶际细菌	6
高通量测序	18	变性梯度凝胶电泳	6
多样性	13	定殖	5
群落结构	8	解淀粉芽孢杆菌	5
微生物多样性	7	气孔免疫	5
磷脂脂肪酸	7	16s rRNA	5

高频关键词	频次	高频关键词	频次
叶际微生物	34	根际微生物	6
叶际	26	叶际细菌	6
高通量测序	18	变性梯度凝胶电泳	6
多样性	13	定殖	5
群落结构	8	解淀粉芽孢杆菌	5
微生物多样性	7	气孔免疫	5
磷脂脂肪酸	7	16s rRNA	5