Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 55-62.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0142
Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Huan(), FAN Yaping, SONG Baiquan, WANG Changxian(
)
Received:
2024-02-29
Revised:
2024-11-01
Online:
2025-01-05
Published:
2025-01-01
HUANG Huan, FAN Yaping, SONG Baiquan, WANG Changxian. Alleviating Effects of Glomus mosseae and Soil Reduction Sterilization on Continuous Cropping Obstacle of Cucumber Seedlings[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 55-62.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0142
处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 49.76±0.06c | 205.33±0.40d | 97.20±1.75c | 210.39±8.96a | 6.67±0.01d |
RCK | 50.51±0.42b | 209.34±0.70c | 175.40±0.99b | 124.57±5.80c | 6.80±0.00c |
0.25% | 52.05±0.14a | 226.82±1.00a | 184.44±0.83a | 197.20±1.37a | 6.84±0.00b |
0.5% | 52.46±0.13a | 211.72±0.57b | 98.14±1.37c | 177.03±4.82b | 6.86±0.01a |
处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 49.76±0.06c | 205.33±0.40d | 97.20±1.75c | 210.39±8.96a | 6.67±0.01d |
RCK | 50.51±0.42b | 209.34±0.70c | 175.40±0.99b | 124.57±5.80c | 6.80±0.00c |
0.25% | 52.05±0.14a | 226.82±1.00a | 184.44±0.83a | 197.20±1.37a | 6.84±0.00b |
0.5% | 52.46±0.13a | 211.72±0.57b | 98.14±1.37c | 177.03±4.82b | 6.86±0.01a |
处理 | 细菌/(×104 cfu/g) | 真菌/(×102 cfu/g) | 细菌/真菌 | NO3-/(mg/kg) | SO42-/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 42±1c | 58±2a | 74.0±5.2c | 10.87±2.32c | 1.30±0.13a |
RCK | 63±2b | 49±1b | 127.1±4.7b | 18.19±0.87b | 0.95±0.06b |
0.25% | 71±2a | 41±3c | 174.4±13.7a | 17.94±0.86b | 1.10±0.02ab |
0.5% | 67±1a | 49±3bc | 139.2±9.2b | 23.55±0.35a | 1.06±0.06b |
处理 | 细菌/(×104 cfu/g) | 真菌/(×102 cfu/g) | 细菌/真菌 | NO3-/(mg/kg) | SO42-/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 42±1c | 58±2a | 74.0±5.2c | 10.87±2.32c | 1.30±0.13a |
RCK | 63±2b | 49±1b | 127.1±4.7b | 18.19±0.87b | 0.95±0.06b |
0.25% | 71±2a | 41±3c | 174.4±13.7a | 17.94±0.86b | 1.10±0.02ab |
0.5% | 67±1a | 49±3bc | 139.2±9.2b | 23.55±0.35a | 1.06±0.06b |
因素 | 株高/×10-2 m | 茎粗/×10-2 m | 叶面积/×10-4 m2 | 生物量/(g/株) | 壮苗指数 | 侵染率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | 地上部 | 根系 | 总生物量 | |||||
CK | + | 9.63±0.71ab | 0.41±0.02b | 246.48±17.75ab | 0.615±0.06abc | 0.021±0.009a | 0.637±0.07abc | 6.78±0.93abc | 22.5±3.70bcd |
- | 8.15±0.74b | 0.39±0.01b | 190.79±8.77c | 0.495±0.05c | 0.016±0.006a | 0.511±0.06c | 4.70±0.37c | 20.00±1.36cd | |
RCK | + | 8.04±0.25b | 0.40±0.01b | 195.63±13.73c | 0.532±0.04bc | 0.014±0.004a | 0.546±0.05bc | 5.42±0.91bc | 35.00±4.19bc |
- | 9.10±0.30ab | 0.44±0.01ab | 248.31±6.2ab | 0.737±0.02a | 0.021±0.004a | 0.758±0.02ab | 9.02±0.35ab | 6.67±1.36d | |
0.25% | + | 9.07±0.08ab | 0.42±0.01b | 206.36±7.99bc | 0.616±0.03abc | 0.019±0.002a | 0.635±0.03abc | 6.04±0.49abc | 45.83±8.54ab |
- | 10.59±0.45a | 0.49±0.01a | 252.12±10.49ab | 0.734±0.03a | 0.040±0.006a | 0.774±0.04a | 9.14±1.04a | 1.67±1.67d | |
0.5% | + | 9.51±0.32ab | 0.43±0.01ab | 212.04±2.89abc | 0.599±0.02abc | 0.021±0.004a | 0.620±0.02abc | 5.98±0.45abc | 66.67±10.27a |
- | 10.85±0.52a | 0.48±0.02a | 259.88±11.75a | 0.702±0.05ab | 0.023±0.010a | 0.726±0.06abc | 8.54±1.25ab | 4.17±2.50d | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.402 | 0.042 | 0.255 | 0.056 | 0.118 | 0.035 |
AM真菌 | 0.080 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.014 | 0.185 | 0.018 | 0.004 | <0.001 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.013 | 0.016 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.210 | 0.008 | 0.005 | <0.001 |
因素 | 株高/×10-2 m | 茎粗/×10-2 m | 叶面积/×10-4 m2 | 生物量/(g/株) | 壮苗指数 | 侵染率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | 地上部 | 根系 | 总生物量 | |||||
CK | + | 9.63±0.71ab | 0.41±0.02b | 246.48±17.75ab | 0.615±0.06abc | 0.021±0.009a | 0.637±0.07abc | 6.78±0.93abc | 22.5±3.70bcd |
- | 8.15±0.74b | 0.39±0.01b | 190.79±8.77c | 0.495±0.05c | 0.016±0.006a | 0.511±0.06c | 4.70±0.37c | 20.00±1.36cd | |
RCK | + | 8.04±0.25b | 0.40±0.01b | 195.63±13.73c | 0.532±0.04bc | 0.014±0.004a | 0.546±0.05bc | 5.42±0.91bc | 35.00±4.19bc |
- | 9.10±0.30ab | 0.44±0.01ab | 248.31±6.2ab | 0.737±0.02a | 0.021±0.004a | 0.758±0.02ab | 9.02±0.35ab | 6.67±1.36d | |
0.25% | + | 9.07±0.08ab | 0.42±0.01b | 206.36±7.99bc | 0.616±0.03abc | 0.019±0.002a | 0.635±0.03abc | 6.04±0.49abc | 45.83±8.54ab |
- | 10.59±0.45a | 0.49±0.01a | 252.12±10.49ab | 0.734±0.03a | 0.040±0.006a | 0.774±0.04a | 9.14±1.04a | 1.67±1.67d | |
0.5% | + | 9.51±0.32ab | 0.43±0.01ab | 212.04±2.89abc | 0.599±0.02abc | 0.021±0.004a | 0.620±0.02abc | 5.98±0.45abc | 66.67±10.27a |
- | 10.85±0.52a | 0.48±0.02a | 259.88±11.75a | 0.702±0.05ab | 0.023±0.010a | 0.726±0.06abc | 8.54±1.25ab | 4.17±2.50d | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.402 | 0.042 | 0.255 | 0.056 | 0.118 | 0.035 |
AM真菌 | 0.080 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.014 | 0.185 | 0.018 | 0.004 | <0.001 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.013 | 0.016 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.210 | 0.008 | 0.005 | <0.001 |
因素 | 全氮含量/% | 氮吸收量/(mg/株) | 全磷含量/% | 磷吸收量/(mg/株) | 全钾含量/% | 钾吸收量/(mg/株) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | ||||||
CK | + | 8.959±0.74a | 55.125±3.42ab | 1.047±0.04a | 6.383±0.46ab | 6.605±0.17a | 40.641±4.97ab |
- | 7.703±0.35ab | 38.165±3.95c | 1.036±0.03a | 5.081±0.39b | 6.274±0.41a | 31.084±3.37ab | |
RCK | + | 7.034±0.27ab | 37.430±2.98c | 0.967±0.04a | 5.122±0.37ab | 5.733±0.17a | 30.505±1.70b |
- | 8.631±0.36a | 69.592±2.48a | 0.867±0.04a | 6.393±0.33ab | 6.045±0.33a | 44.541±3.28ab | |
0.25% | + | 6.145±0.17b | 37.851±0.55c | 0.896±0.03a | 5.518±0.39ab | 5.764±0.15a | 35.505±2.22ab |
- | 6.659±0.40ab | 48.878±3.40abc | 0.958±0.03a | 7.019±0.38ab | 5.625±0.41a | 41.285±1.77ab | |
0.5% | + | 6.954±0.59ab | 41.636±4.46bc | 0.918±0.02a | 5.494±0.17ab | 6.069±0.42a | 36.499±1.51ab |
- | 8.134±0.79ab | 57.134±4.21ab | 1.003±0.03a | 7.064±0.70a | 6.445±0.17a | 45.267±4.47a | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | 0.006 | 0.179 | 0.007 | 0.378 | 0.079 | 0.480 |
AM真菌 | 0.166 | 0.001 | 0.726 | 0.018 | 0.825 | 0.045 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.045 | <0.0001 | 0.062 | 0.006 | 0.609 | 0.005 |
因素 | 全氮含量/% | 氮吸收量/(mg/株) | 全磷含量/% | 磷吸收量/(mg/株) | 全钾含量/% | 钾吸收量/(mg/株) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | ||||||
CK | + | 8.959±0.74a | 55.125±3.42ab | 1.047±0.04a | 6.383±0.46ab | 6.605±0.17a | 40.641±4.97ab |
- | 7.703±0.35ab | 38.165±3.95c | 1.036±0.03a | 5.081±0.39b | 6.274±0.41a | 31.084±3.37ab | |
RCK | + | 7.034±0.27ab | 37.430±2.98c | 0.967±0.04a | 5.122±0.37ab | 5.733±0.17a | 30.505±1.70b |
- | 8.631±0.36a | 69.592±2.48a | 0.867±0.04a | 6.393±0.33ab | 6.045±0.33a | 44.541±3.28ab | |
0.25% | + | 6.145±0.17b | 37.851±0.55c | 0.896±0.03a | 5.518±0.39ab | 5.764±0.15a | 35.505±2.22ab |
- | 6.659±0.40ab | 48.878±3.40abc | 0.958±0.03a | 7.019±0.38ab | 5.625±0.41a | 41.285±1.77ab | |
0.5% | + | 6.954±0.59ab | 41.636±4.46bc | 0.918±0.02a | 5.494±0.17ab | 6.069±0.42a | 36.499±1.51ab |
- | 8.134±0.79ab | 57.134±4.21ab | 1.003±0.03a | 7.064±0.70a | 6.445±0.17a | 45.267±4.47a | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | 0.006 | 0.179 | 0.007 | 0.378 | 0.079 | 0.480 |
AM真菌 | 0.166 | 0.001 | 0.726 | 0.018 | 0.825 | 0.045 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.045 | <0.0001 | 0.062 | 0.006 | 0.609 | 0.005 |
因素 | 钙含量/(g/kg) | 钙吸收量/(mg/株) | 镁含量/(g/kg) | 镁吸收量/(mg/株) | 铁含量/(g/kg) | 铁吸收量/(mg/株) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | ||||||
CK | + | 51.297±1.03a | 31.565±2.66ab | 11.432±1.20a | 7.034±0.81abc | 1.300±0.09b | 0.800±0.09a |
- | 47.368±3.69a | 23.467±2.28b | 10.264±1.11a | 5.085±0.62c | 0.841±0.07b | 0.417±0.06a | |
RCK | + | 55.578±1.01a | 29.575±2.09ab | 11.662±1.15a | 6.206±0.53bc | 2.359±0.17a | 1.255±0.14a |
- | 49.998±0.68a | 36.840±1.08ab | 11.689±1.17a | 8.613±0.33ab | 0.929±0.15b | 0.684±0.10a | |
0.25% | + | 55.834±1.55a | 34.391±1.24a | 12.033±0.11a | 7.412±0.29abc | 2.481±0.15a | 1.528±0.09a |
- | 51.090±1.64a | 37.501±2.85a | 12.002±0.16a | 8.810±0.52a | 1.217±0.10b | 0.893±0.10a | |
0.5% | + | 57.069±1.02a | 34.168±1.24a | 11.865±0.10a | 7.104±0.30abc | 2.654±0.16a | 1.589±0.10a |
- | 48.712±1.81a | 34.214±2.14a | 11.386±0.28a | 7.997±0.77ab | 1.332±0.02b | 0.935±0.07a | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | 0.113 | 0.002 | 0.069 | 0.007 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
AM真菌 | 0.0002 | 0.698 | 0.184 | 0.101 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.634 | 0.006 | 0.487 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.521 |
因素 | 钙含量/(g/kg) | 钙吸收量/(mg/株) | 镁含量/(g/kg) | 镁吸收量/(mg/株) | 铁含量/(g/kg) | 铁吸收量/(mg/株) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | ||||||
CK | + | 51.297±1.03a | 31.565±2.66ab | 11.432±1.20a | 7.034±0.81abc | 1.300±0.09b | 0.800±0.09a |
- | 47.368±3.69a | 23.467±2.28b | 10.264±1.11a | 5.085±0.62c | 0.841±0.07b | 0.417±0.06a | |
RCK | + | 55.578±1.01a | 29.575±2.09ab | 11.662±1.15a | 6.206±0.53bc | 2.359±0.17a | 1.255±0.14a |
- | 49.998±0.68a | 36.840±1.08ab | 11.689±1.17a | 8.613±0.33ab | 0.929±0.15b | 0.684±0.10a | |
0.25% | + | 55.834±1.55a | 34.391±1.24a | 12.033±0.11a | 7.412±0.29abc | 2.481±0.15a | 1.528±0.09a |
- | 51.090±1.64a | 37.501±2.85a | 12.002±0.16a | 8.810±0.52a | 1.217±0.10b | 0.893±0.10a | |
0.5% | + | 57.069±1.02a | 34.168±1.24a | 11.865±0.10a | 7.104±0.30abc | 2.654±0.16a | 1.589±0.10a |
- | 48.712±1.81a | 34.214±2.14a | 11.386±0.28a | 7.997±0.77ab | 1.332±0.02b | 0.935±0.07a | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | 0.113 | 0.002 | 0.069 | 0.007 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
AM真菌 | 0.0002 | 0.698 | 0.184 | 0.101 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.634 | 0.006 | 0.487 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.521 |
因素 | 细菌/(×104 cfu/g) | 真菌/(×102 cfu/g) | 细菌/真菌 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | |||
CK | + | 177±4.055a | 52±2.028e | 341±20.844a |
- | 158±5.783a | 92±4.359b | 173±13.382cd | |
RCK | + | 183±9.838a | 61±0.882de | 298±19.314ab |
- | 164±4.910a | 69±3.844cd | 236±5.976bc | |
0.25% | + | 222±6.333a | 75±0.667cd | 295±10.400ab |
- | 205±3.712a | 127±4.055a | 162±7.909d | |
0.5% | + | 198±2.667a | 62±2.906de | 317±15.069a |
- | 195±3.844a | 80±2.186bc | 243±5.064b | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.009 |
AM真菌 | 0.002 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.404 | <0.0001 | 0.003 |
因素 | 细菌/(×104 cfu/g) | 真菌/(×102 cfu/g) | 细菌/真菌 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
土壤处理 | AM真菌 | |||
CK | + | 177±4.055a | 52±2.028e | 341±20.844a |
- | 158±5.783a | 92±4.359b | 173±13.382cd | |
RCK | + | 183±9.838a | 61±0.882de | 298±19.314ab |
- | 164±4.910a | 69±3.844cd | 236±5.976bc | |
0.25% | + | 222±6.333a | 75±0.667cd | 295±10.400ab |
- | 205±3.712a | 127±4.055a | 162±7.909d | |
0.5% | + | 198±2.667a | 62±2.906de | 317±15.069a |
- | 195±3.844a | 80±2.186bc | 243±5.064b | |
P值 | 土壤处理 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.009 |
AM真菌 | 0.002 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
土壤处理×AM真菌 | 0.404 | <0.0001 | 0.003 |
[1] |
赵文. 黄瓜栽培的现状及其发展趋势[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2022, 2(3):32-34.
|
[2] |
苗锦山. 宏观和微观视角下我国设施蔬菜产业发展的问题和对策分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(4):185-190.
|
[3] |
于泓, 卢维宏, 张乃明. 我国设施栽培土壤退化特征及修复技术研究进展[J]. 蔬菜, 2021(11):35-42.
|
[4] |
苏一诺, 李孟滕, 陈西文, 等. 作物连作障碍及防控技术研究进展[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2019(9):44-48.
|
[5] |
朱文娟, 王小国. 强还原土壤灭菌研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(2):223-233.
|
[6] |
王广印, 郭卫丽, 陈碧华, 等. 强还原土壤灭菌法防控瓜菜土壤连作障碍效果的影响因素[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(2):11-18.
|
[7] |
陆羽, 白杨, 陈庭园, 等. 柑桔属水果皮渣资源化利用综述[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(1):87-89.
|
[8] |
pmid: 10988069 |
[9] |
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1126/science.aan0081 pmid: 28596311 |
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:30-98,163-165,263-276.
|
[17] |
那淑芝, 杨贵明. 四苯硼钠测定土壤速效钾比浊条件的改进[J]. 土壤肥料, 1991(4):41-42.
|
[18] |
郝文英, 李良谟, 李振高, 等. 土壤微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985:43-59.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
樊娅萍, 陈芳玲, 贺苗苗, 等. 强还原灭菌条件下添加橘皮对土壤性状与酶活性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(S1):253-259.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192536 |
[21] |
魏光钰, 胡勇, 吴永琴, 等. 灭菌方式对植烟土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 49(6):652-660.
|
[22] |
滕凯, 张清壮, 彭镜先, 等. 强还原土壤灭菌对烟草种植前后土壤化学性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2022, 55(4):9-19.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
闫宁, 战宇, 苗馨月, 等. 强还原土壤灭菌处理对人参连作土壤细菌群落结构及土壤酶活的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6):133-144.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0695 |
[27] |
饶德安, 刘潘洋, 邹路易, 等. 长期连作及强还原土壤灭菌处理对烤烟根际土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(4):47-56.
|
[28] |
黄新琦, 温腾, 孟磊, 等. 土壤强还原过程产生的有机酸对土传病原菌的抑制作用[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6):38-43.
|
[29] |
黄新琦, 温腾, 孟磊, 等. 土壤快速强烈还原对于尖孢镰刀菌的抑制作用[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(16):4526-4534.
|
[30] |
刘星, 张书乐, 刘国锋, 等. 土壤生物消毒对甘肃省中部沿黄灌区马铃薯连作障碍的防控效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4):1205-1214.
|
[1] | ZHANG Zhengzhen, MU Ruirui, WANG Jia, XU Can, CHEN Yongwei, ZHANG Zhansheng, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong. Effect of Potassium Application Rate on Absorption, Transport and Yield of Maize Potassium [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 47-56. |
[2] | FAN Yaping, LI Jingyi, HE Miaomiao, WANG Changxian. Studies on Effects of Nitrate Nitrogen and Ammonium Nitrogen Combination on Alleviating Ammonium Toxicity in Cucumber Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 27-32. |
[3] | QIAO Yue, HU Cheng, WAN Jianhua, XU Hualin, LIU Maojun, GUO Weihong, DAI Li, ZHANG Chunhua, DENG Chaoran. Effects of Different Fertilization Patterns on Rice Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 9-15. |
[4] | WAN Lili, WANG Zhuanrong, TANG Mi, ZHANG Xuejun, REN Jian, ZENG Hongxia, ZHANG Na, WEI Jiaqi, XIONG Jianshun. Optimization of CGMMV-VIGS System in Cucurbits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(30): 40-47. |
[5] | YAN Shi, LIANG Jinfeng, LIU Yu, YU Yueyue, HAN Bao, GUO Ning. Study on Soil Disinfection with Vegetable Straw and Lime Nitrogen [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 76-80. |
[6] | FU Huijuan, ZHANG Haiting, YI Jun, ZENG Shuocheng, XU Bingzhi, YE Jianrong, LI Qiyong, ZHANG Hong, LI Xingyue. Effect of Entomopathogenic Nematode Combining with Soil Amendment on Soil Nematode Community Structure in Rhizosphere of Cucumber [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(28): 134-142. |
[7] | WU Tengfei, DENG Ting, LI Zeyu, ZENG Zhaobing, ZHANG Mu, LI Haifeng. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Formula Fertilizer on Nutrient Absorption and Yield of Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 1-7. |
[8] | XIA Lijuan, XU Zhonghuai, DONG Xuejuan, WAN Li. Bacillus velezensis: Toxicity and Field Efficacy Against Cucumber Powdery Mildew and Its Safety Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 111-115. |
[9] | KOU Peiwen, LIU Changle, XU Yike, SONG Zhongxing, LI Bo, ZHANG Yongsheng, HUANG Wenjing, TANG Zhishu. Characteristics of Rhizosphere Microbial Community of Three Medicinal Plants in Eastern Inner Mongolia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 58-67. |
[10] | CHEN Juan, LIU Bin, LEI Weiwei, CHEN Xiaohui, FAN Shanshan, CHEN Suxian, GAO Fei. Study on Application Effect of New Fertilizer for Greenhouse Cucumber [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(31): 50-54. |
[11] | ZHU Shijun, WANG Lili, JIN Shuquan, WANG Feng, ZHOU Jinbo, LU Xiaohong. The Alleviating Effect of Microbial Fertilizer on Watermelon Continuous Cropping Obstacles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(28): 48-53. |
[12] | HE Mingyi, HUANG Mengmeng, LIU Yueyi, LING Hongzhi, GE Jingping. Optimization of Fermentation Technology and Quality of L- Lactic Acid Cucumber [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 26-32. |
[13] | WEN Jiangli, GUO Wenzhong, JIAO Youquan, ZHANG Tao, WU Xiaosu. Growth Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency of Tomato and Cucumber Seedlings in Different Facilities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(22): 40-46. |
[14] | WANG Yanping, LI Ping, WANG Weirui, GAO Fei, WANG Rui, FAN Shanshan, SHI Xiangyun, WU Wenqiang. Effects of Soil Disinfection on Greenhouse Soil-borne Diseases and Growth of Tea Chrysanthemum Under Continuous Cropping Cultivation System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(21): 83-87. |
[15] | GUO Shanhu, WU Zhongming, WANG Yongping, ZHANG Jintao, XU Sai, WU Jia, DING Borui, DA Yingfei, ZHANG Mingtian, LUO Qipeng. Preliminary Research on Reducing Effect of Different Fertilization Measures on Continuous Cropping Obstacles of Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 9-15. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||