Trend and Topic Analysis of Global Plant Science Research

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200300216

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the needs of agricultural science and technology innovation, to provide support and refence for the effective allocation of agricultural science and technology resources, the research analyzed the current status and trend of global plant science research from the perspective of bibliometrics. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to construct a search strategy, based on the Web of Science database and bibliometric analysis tools, bibliometrics analysis was carried out on the number of articles published, the countries, institutions, journals, and authors influence with high publication numbers. The main results indicate that the number of articles published from 1995 to 2018 shows a steady growth trend as a whole. The United States and China are main contributors to the articles, but the number of citations per article contributed by the United States and European countries is higher than that of China. Chinese scientific research institutions have an advantage in the number of articles, while German Max Planck features highly the number of citations per article. The content analysis was carried out on Top10 articles with high citations published from 2016 to 2018, and the visual analysis of the topic clustering of high-frequency word co-occurrence was conducted. The results show that ‘plants respond to biotic and abiotic stress’, ‘gene editing technology’, ‘genomic analysis’, ‘plant reproductive development regulation’ are important research directions that have been given growing attention in recent years. The subject content is in accordance with the preliminary needs research. The research proves that these research directions will play an important role in promoting the development of agricultural innovation.

Key words: plant science, development trend, bibliometrics, topic analysis, co-occurrence analysis

CLC Number:

G255.2

Li Nan, Li Xiaoman, Zhang Xuefu. Trend and Topic Analysis of Global Plant Science Research[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(34): 148-159.

Figures/Tables 12

References 38

[1]	重康. 中国植物科学基础研究概览[J].植物学报2015,50(4):412-459.
[2]	杨淑华, 王台, 钱前, 等. 2015年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2016,51(4):416-472. doi: 10.11983/CBB16160 URL
[3]	王小菁, 萧浪涛, 董爱武, 等. 2016年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2017,52(4):394-452. doi: 10.11983/CBB17147 URL
[4]	陈凡, 钱前, 王台, 等. 2017年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2018,53(4):391-440. doi: 10.11983/CBB18177 URL
[5]	钱前, 漆小泉, 林荣呈, 等. 2018年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2019,54(4):405-440. doi: 10.11983/CBB19165 URL
[6]	李楠. 基于文献计量的水稻基因组学研究趋势以及热点分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(5):184-193.
[7]	李晓曼, 孙巍. 领域主题动态演进分析——以动物资源与育种领域为例[J].数字图书管论坛 2015(12):29-33.
[8]	吴笑臣. 国内STEM教育研究热点领域及特点——基于2011—2016年CNKI文献的共词分析[J]. 赣南师范学院学报, 2019,40(4):54-58.
[9]	Zhu J K. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants[J]. Cell, 2016,167(2):313-324. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029 URL pmid: 27716505
[10]	Barrangou R, Doudna J A. Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2016,34(9):933-941. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3659 URL pmid: 27606440
[11]	Kersey P J, Allen J E, Armean I, et al. Ensembl Genomes 2016: more genomes, more complexity[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016,44(D1):D574-580. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1209 URL pmid: 26578574
[12]	Reimand J, Arak T, Vilo J. g:Profiler--a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2011 update)[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011,39(Web Server issue):W307-315. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr378 URL pmid: 21646343
[13]	Barka E A, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, et al. Taxonomy, Physiology, and Natural Products of Actinobacteria[J]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2016,80(1):1-43. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00019-15 URL pmid: 26609051
[14]	Couto D, Zipfel C. Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2016,16(9):537-552. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.77 URL pmid: 27477127
[15]	Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar P P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses[J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2016,16:86. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0771-y URL pmid: 27079791
[16]	Katz L, Baltz R H. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future[J]. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol, 2016,43(2-3):155-76. doi: 10.1007/s10295-015-1723-5 URL pmid: 26739136
[17]	Panchy N, Lehti-Shiu M, Shiu S H. Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants[J]. Plant Physiol, 2016,171(4):2294-316. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00523 URL pmid: 27288366
[18]	Sah S K, Reddy K R, Li J. Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016,7:571. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00571 URL pmid: 27200044
[19]	Gaudelli N M, Komor A C, Rees H A, et al. Programmable base editing of AT to GC in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2017,551:464-471. URL pmid: 29160308
[20]	Zong Y, Wang Y, Li C, et al. Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2017,35(5):438-440. URL pmid: 28244994
[21]	Liang Z, Chen K, Li T, et al. Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes[J]. Nat Commun, 2017,8:14261. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14261 URL pmid: 28098143
[22]	Jin J, Tian F, Yang D C, et al. PlantTFDB 4.0: toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017,45(D1):D1040-D1045. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw982 URL pmid: 27924042
[23]	Jiao Y, Peluso P, Shi J, et al. Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies[J]. Nature, 2017,546:524-527. doi: 10.1038/nature22971 URL pmid: 28605751
[24]	Daccord N, Celton J M, Linsmith G, et al. High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development[J]. Nat Genet, 2017. 49(7):1099-1106. doi: 10.1038/ng.3886 URL pmid: 28581499
[25]	Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, et al. Abscisic Acid Signaling and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: A Review on Current Knowledge and Future Prospects[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017,8:161. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00161 URL pmid: 28265276
[26]	Zipfel C, Oldroyd G E. Plant signalling in symbiosis and immunity[J]. Nature, 2017,543:328-336. doi: 10.1038/nature22009 URL pmid: 28300100
[27]	Abudayyeh O O, Gootenberg J S, Essletzbichler P, et al. RNA targeting with CRISPR-Cas13[J]. Nature, 2017,550:280-284. doi: 10.1038/nature24049 URL pmid: 28976959
[28]	Bowman J L, Kohchi T, Yamato K T, et al. Insights into Land Plant Evolution Garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha Genome[J]. Cell, 2017,171(2):287-304. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.030 URL pmid: 28985561
[29]	International Wheat Genome Sequencing. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome[J]. Science, 2018,361. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0887 URL pmid: 30262485
[30]	Wang W, Mauleon R, Hu Z, et al. Genomic variation in 3010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice[J]. Nature, 2018,557:43-49. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0063-9 URL pmid: 29695866
[31]	Waterhouse R M, Seppey M, Simao F A, et al. BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2017,35(3):543-548. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx319 URL pmid: 29220515
[32]	Doron S, Melamed S, Ofir G, et al. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome[J]. Science, 2018,359. doi: 10.1126/science.aat3764 URL pmid: 29599229
[33]	Watson A, Ghosh S, Williams M J, et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding[J]. Nat Plants, 2018,4(1):23-29. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0083-8 URL pmid: 29292376
[34]	Noctor G, Reichheld J P, Foyer C H. ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants[J]. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2018,80:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.013 URL pmid: 28733165
[35]	Cai Q, Qiao L, Wang M, et al. Plants send small RNAs in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes[J]. Science, 2018,360:1126-1129. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4142 URL pmid: 29773668
[36]	Zhalnina K, Louie K B, Hao Z, et al. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly[J]. Nat Microbiol, 2018,3(4):470-480. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3 URL pmid: 29556109
[37]	Yang Y, Guo Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses[J]. New Phytol, 2018,217(2):523-539. doi: 10.1111/nph.14920 URL pmid: 29205383
[38]	Wei C, Yang H, Wang S, et al. Draft genome sequence of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis provides insights into the evolution of the tea genome and tea quality[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018,115(18):E4151-E4158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719622115 URL pmid: 29678829

年份	入选“中国科学十大进展”成果	入选“中国生命科学领域十大进展”成果
2014	阐明独脚金内酯调控水稻分蘖和株型的信号途径
2015		（1）高等植物光系统I光合膜蛋白超分子复合物晶体结构解析; （2）水稻耐寒机制研究
2016	水稻(Oryza sativa)产量性状杂种优势的分子遗传机制解析入	（1）植物受精过程中雌雄配子体信号识别机制的研究; （2）独脚金内酯的受体感知机制
2017		（1）水稻广谱持久抗病与产量平衡的遗传与表观调控机制; （2）水稻新型广谱抗病遗传基础发现与机制解析
2018	调控植物生长-代谢平衡实现可持续农业发展	中国被子植物区系进化历史研究

年份	入选“中国科学十大进展”成果	入选“中国生命科学领域十大进展”成果
2014	阐明独脚金内酯调控水稻分蘖和株型的信号途径
2015		（1）高等植物光系统I光合膜蛋白超分子复合物晶体结构解析; （2）水稻耐寒机制研究
2016	水稻(Oryza sativa)产量性状杂种优势的分子遗传机制解析入	（1）植物受精过程中雌雄配子体信号识别机制的研究; （2）独脚金内酯的受体感知机制
2017		（1）水稻广谱持久抗病与产量平衡的遗传与表观调控机制; （2）水稻新型广谱抗病遗传基础发现与机制解析
2018	调控植物生长-代谢平衡实现可持续农业发展	中国被子植物区系进化历史研究

国家	发文量	发文量占比	总被引频次	篇均被引频次
中国	14846	0.31	77113	5.19
美国	9494	0.20	67190	7.08
印度	3472	0.07	15852	4.57
德国	3229	0.07	26578	8.23
日本	2223	0.05	13655	6.14
法国	2221	0.05	18891	8.51
澳大利亚	2212	0.05	16521	7.47
巴西	2177	0.05	6699	3.08
英国	1978	0.04	18250	9.23
西班牙	1899	0.04	13499	7.11
韩国	1724	0.04	8999	5.22
加拿大	1616	0.03	11068	6.85
意大利	1591	0.03	10372	6.52
巴基斯坦	1337	0.03	5553	4.15
伊朗	988	0.02	3048	3.09
荷兰	920	0.02	9172	9.97
波兰	863	0.02	3496	4.05
墨西哥	792	0.02	3873	4.89
瑞士	753	0.02	7473	9.92
比利时	716	0.02	6095	8.51

国家	发文量	发文量占比	总被引频次	篇均被引频次
中国	14846	0.31	77113	5.19
美国	9494	0.20	67190	7.08
印度	3472	0.07	15852	4.57
德国	3229	0.07	26578	8.23
日本	2223	0.05	13655	6.14
法国	2221	0.05	18891	8.51
澳大利亚	2212	0.05	16521	7.47
巴西	2177	0.05	6699	3.08
英国	1978	0.04	18250	9.23
西班牙	1899	0.04	13499	7.11
韩国	1724	0.04	8999	5.22
加拿大	1616	0.03	11068	6.85
意大利	1591	0.03	10372	6.52
巴基斯坦	1337	0.03	5553	4.15
伊朗	988	0.02	3048	3.09
荷兰	920	0.02	9172	9.97
波兰	863	0.02	3496	4.05
墨西哥	792	0.02	3873	4.89
瑞士	753	0.02	7473	9.92
比利时	716	0.02	6095	8.51

机构	发文量	总被引频次	篇均被引频次	发文量占比
中国科学院	2295	16829	7.33	0.05
中国农业科学院	1646	9758	5.93	0.03
美国农业部	1419	8396	5.92	0.03
法国国家农业科学院	1257	10956	8.72	0.03
美国加州大学系统	1194	11813	9.89	0.03
南京农业大学	1145	6569	5.74	0.02
法国国家科学研究中心	1086	9356	8.62	0.02
印度农业研究委员会	976	3509	3.60	0.02
中国农业大学	866	4854	5.61	0.02
西北农林科技大学	860	4582	5.33	0.02
华中农业大学	824	6138	7.45	0.02
西班牙科学研究委员会	816	6554	8.03	0.02
中国科学院大学	799	5634	7.05	0.02
马克斯普朗克学会	638	6837	10.72	0.01
浙江大学	590	3823	6.48	0.01
佛罗里达州立大学	539	2829	5.25	0.01
瓦赫宁根大学	527	4893	9.28	0.01
巴基斯坦费萨拉巴德农业大学	524	2364	4.51	0.01
加州大学戴维思分校	516	4381	8.49	0.01