Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (15): 142-146.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19010138
Special Issue: 玉米
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Jianwei, Wang Zongsheng, Shi Guangliang, Jiang Yanjun, Han Juhong, Li Qingmei, Yue Decheng()
Received:
2019-01-28
Revised:
2019-05-19
Online:
2020-05-25
Published:
2020-05-21
Contact:
Yue Decheng
E-mail:ydc_196206138@163.com
CLC Number:
Liu Jianwei, Wang Zongsheng, Shi Guangliang, Jiang Yanjun, Han Juhong, Li Qingmei, Yue Decheng. Effects of Several Herbicides on the Growth and Development of Maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(15): 142-146.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19010138
处理 | 株高/cm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 | 拔节期 | 大喇叭口期 | 成熟期 | |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 10.85 ±0.37 bAB | 34.85±1.46 aA | 170.33±8.02 aA | 253.13±3.33 abA |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 11.04 ±0.46 bAB | 32.57 ±5.54 aA | 163.80±14.02 aAB | 257.20±7.81 abA |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 11.65±1.30 abAB | 33.73 ±4.22 aA | 162.37±1.75 aAB | 267.43±9.19 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 10.68 ±0.75 bB | 35.28 ±3.84 aA | 167.90±6.41 aA | 261.20±8.75 abA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 12.98 ±0.92 aA | 34.39 ±2.97 aA | 162.43±10.71 aAB | 257.60±5.25 abA |
CK1 | 11.86±1.18 abAB | 33.44 ±2.12 aA | 144.57±11.34 bB | 249.17±12.02 bA |
CK2 | 10.69 ±0.22 bB | 32.67 ±3.03 aA | 170.67±5.25 aA | 253.87±8.35 abA |
处理 | 株高/cm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 | 拔节期 | 大喇叭口期 | 成熟期 | |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 10.85 ±0.37 bAB | 34.85±1.46 aA | 170.33±8.02 aA | 253.13±3.33 abA |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 11.04 ±0.46 bAB | 32.57 ±5.54 aA | 163.80±14.02 aAB | 257.20±7.81 abA |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 11.65±1.30 abAB | 33.73 ±4.22 aA | 162.37±1.75 aAB | 267.43±9.19 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 10.68 ±0.75 bB | 35.28 ±3.84 aA | 167.90±6.41 aA | 261.20±8.75 abA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 12.98 ±0.92 aA | 34.39 ±2.97 aA | 162.43±10.71 aAB | 257.60±5.25 abA |
CK1 | 11.86±1.18 abAB | 33.44 ±2.12 aA | 144.57±11.34 bB | 249.17±12.02 bA |
CK2 | 10.69 ±0.22 bB | 32.67 ±3.03 aA | 170.67±5.25 aA | 253.87±8.35 abA |
处理 | 茎粗/mm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 | 拔节期 | 大喇叭口期 | 成熟期 | |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 4.04±0.42 aA | 16.28±1.63 aA | 21.88±0.49 aA | 20.53±0.19 aA |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 3.96±0.28 aA | 16.09±2.70 aA | 21.79±1.53 aA | 19.68±1.09 aA |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 3.94±0.08 aA | 16.61±2.62 aA | 21.55±0.57 aA | 19.91±0.59 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 3.83±0.20 aA | 16.99±1.43 aA | 21.86±0.30 aA | 19.71±0.76 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 3.94±0.16 aA | 16.34±1.61 aA | 21.18±0.71 aA | 19.56±0.23 aA |
CK1 | 3.85±0.21 aA | 16.47±1.82 aA | 18.79±1.69 bB | 16.63±1.86 bB |
CK2 | 3.85±0.34 aA | 16.58±1.26 aA | 21.54±0.47 aA | 19.49±0.78 aA |
处理 | 茎粗/mm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 | 拔节期 | 大喇叭口期 | 成熟期 | |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 4.04±0.42 aA | 16.28±1.63 aA | 21.88±0.49 aA | 20.53±0.19 aA |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 3.96±0.28 aA | 16.09±2.70 aA | 21.79±1.53 aA | 19.68±1.09 aA |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 3.94±0.08 aA | 16.61±2.62 aA | 21.55±0.57 aA | 19.91±0.59 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 3.83±0.20 aA | 16.99±1.43 aA | 21.86±0.30 aA | 19.71±0.76 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 3.94±0.16 aA | 16.34±1.61 aA | 21.18±0.71 aA | 19.56±0.23 aA |
CK1 | 3.85±0.21 aA | 16.47±1.82 aA | 18.79±1.69 bB | 16.63±1.86 bB |
CK2 | 3.85±0.34 aA | 16.58±1.26 aA | 21.54±0.47 aA | 19.49±0.78 aA |
处理 | 果穗粗/cm | 果穗有效长/cm | 穗粒数/粒 | 百粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 4.89±0.05 aA | 18.44±0.14 aA | 695.67±23.16 abA | 32.18±0.27 aA |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 4.95±0.05 aA | 18.47±0.51 aA | 666.20±12.45 abA | 31.79±0.51 aAB |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 4.96±0.07 aA | 18.93±0.49 aA | 682.60±17.81 abA | 31.74±0.14 aAB |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 5.09±0.37 aA | 18.97±0.75 aA | 677.00±50.99 abA | 32.48±0.67 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 5.02±0.25 aA | 18.63±0.15 aA | 675.47±20.18 abA | 32.09±0.61 aA |
CK1 | 4.80±0.05 aA | 18.03±0.67 aA | 641.53±33.85 bA | 29.82±0.50 bB |
CK2 | 5.08±0.11 aA | 19.10±0.56 aA | 705.13±34.64 aA | 32.51±1.87 aA |
处理 | 果穗粗/cm | 果穗有效长/cm | 穗粒数/粒 | 百粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 4.89±0.05 aA | 18.44±0.14 aA | 695.67±23.16 abA | 32.18±0.27 aA |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 4.95±0.05 aA | 18.47±0.51 aA | 666.20±12.45 abA | 31.79±0.51 aAB |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 4.96±0.07 aA | 18.93±0.49 aA | 682.60±17.81 abA | 31.74±0.14 aAB |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 5.09±0.37 aA | 18.97±0.75 aA | 677.00±50.99 abA | 32.48±0.67 aA |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 5.02±0.25 aA | 18.63±0.15 aA | 675.47±20.18 abA | 32.09±0.61 aA |
CK1 | 4.80±0.05 aA | 18.03±0.67 aA | 641.53±33.85 bA | 29.82±0.50 bB |
CK2 | 5.08±0.11 aA | 19.10±0.56 aA | 705.13±34.64 aA | 32.51±1.87 aA |
处理 | 小区产量/ kg | 折合产量/ (kg/hm2) | 较CK2 增加百分比/% | 较CK1 增加百分比/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 22.98±1.77 aA | 13874.80 | 2.25 | 28.41 |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 22.43±0.92 aA | 13544.69 | -0.18 | 25.35 |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 21.82±1.32 aA | 13174.32 | -2.91 | 21.93 |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 23.30±2.46 aA | 14070.05 | 3.69 | 30.22 |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 22.49±1.75 aA | 13578.90 | 0.07 | 25.67 |
CK1 | 17.89±2.08 bB | 10805.15 | -20.37 | — |
CK2 | 22.47±0.40 aA | 13568.84 | — | 25.58 |
处理 | 小区产量/ kg | 折合产量/ (kg/hm2) | 较CK2 增加百分比/% | 较CK1 增加百分比/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
75%二氯吡啶酸SG 150 g/hm2 | 22.98±1.77 aA | 13874.80 | 2.25 | 28.41 |
90%莠去津WG 1650 g/hm2 | 22.43±0.92 aA | 13544.69 | -0.18 | 25.35 |
56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 450 g/hm2 | 21.82±1.32 aA | 13174.32 | -2.91 | 21.93 |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+90%莠去津WG 150 g/hm2+450 g/hm2 | 23.30±2.46 aA | 14070.05 | 3.69 | 30.22 |
75%二氯吡啶酸SG+56% 2甲4氯钠盐SP 120 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 22.49±1.75 aA | 13578.90 | 0.07 | 25.67 |
CK1 | 17.89±2.08 bB | 10805.15 | -20.37 | — |
CK2 | 22.47±0.40 aA | 13568.84 | — | 25.58 |
[1] | 徐田军, 吕天放, 赵久然 , 等. 除草剂对不同玉米品种生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018,26(8):1159-1169. |
[2] | 贾富勤, 张佳 . 三大作物田杂草防除现状与对策[J]. 安徽农业, 2004(9):65. |
[3] | 孔晓民, 曾苏明, 韩成卫 , 等. 不同除草剂对夏玉米田杂草的防治效果研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2013,45(10):111-113. |
[4] | 杜金河, 李友政, 吕述斗 , 等. 淮北地区夏玉米田杂草的发生规律及化除技术[J]. 江苏农业科学, 1999(3):42-44. |
[5] | 丁祖军, 张洪进, 张夕林 , 等. 玉米田杂草发生规律经济防除阈值及竞争临界期研究[J]. 杂草科学, 2003(2):15-17. |
[6] | 张国, 逯非, 黄志刚 , 等. 我国主粮作物的化学农药用量及其温室气体排放估算[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(9):2875-2883. |
[7] | 陈海伟, 张鲁华, 陈德富 , 等. 除草剂及抗除草剂作物的应用现状与展望[J]. 生物技术通报, 2012(10):35-40. |
[8] | 王晓菁, 牛艳, 赵子丹 , 等. 二氯吡啶酸在油菜和土壤中的消解动态研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2013,42(12):94-97. |
[9] | Soloman K R, Baker D B, Richards R P . Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1996,15(1):31-34. |
[10] | 袁传卫, 姜兴印 . 光合作用抑制性除草剂的研究[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2014,35(4):23-27. |
[11] | 王凤芝, 孙福华, 张晓东 . 2甲4氯钠粉剂防除稻田扁秆藨草药效试验[J]. 河北农业科学, 2005,9(4):40-42. |
[12] | 石小堰, 李凤海 . 玉米苗前除草剂种质抗性评价及鉴定指标筛选[J]. 玉米科学, 2017,25(4):48-54. |
[13] | 刘方明, 梁文举, 闻大中 . 耕作方法和除草剂对玉米田杂草群落的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005,16(10):1879-1882. |
[14] | Ralph P J . Herbicide toxicity of Halophilaovalis assessed by chlorophyll a fluorescence[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2000,66(2):141-152. |
[15] | Green J M, Ulrich J F . Response of corn (Zea mays L.)inbred lines and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides[J]. Weed Science, 1993,41(3):508-516. |
[16] | 李致闻, 史振声, 林继山 , 等. 不同抗性基因型玉米对烟嘧磺隆除草剂的反应差异[J]. 玉米科学, 2012,20(4):32-36. |
[17] | 柳建伟 . 5种除草剂对野艾蒿的防除效果及对胡麻安全性的测定[J]. 农药, 2018,57(6):465-468. |
[18] | 柳建伟, 王宗胜, 姜延军 , 等. 不同剂量除草剂混配对野艾蒿的防除效果及对胡麻的安全性[J]. 杂草学报, 2018,36(2):48-52. |
[19] | 吕建伟, 马天进, 黄万兵 , 等. 花生田除草剂筛选及其对花生农艺性状的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2016,45(1):53-56. |
[20] | 张国宾, 冯秀杰, 周星洋 , 等. 稻田除草剂残留对后茬作物烟草农艺性状和生理代谢的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2016,37(1):41-45. |
[21] | 李巍, 杜晓华, 尚辉 , 等. 除草剂对苎麻生长及经济性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(9):138-144. |
[22] | 靳彩霞 . 不同除草剂防除玉米田杂草的效果试验[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2010(1):25-27. |
[23] | 黄顶成, 尤民生, 侯有明 , 等. 化学除草剂对农田生物群落的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2005,25(6):1451-1458. |
[24] | 孙海清 . 植物发生药害的补救措施[J]. 吉林农业, 2008(2):26. |
[1] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[2] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[3] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[4] | JI Kun, WANG Bin, ZHAO Bowen, XUE Hao, WU Jianmin, ZHU Xiaojian, WANG Yixin, ZHAO Haijun, HAN Zanping. Different Maize Germplasm Materials: Grey Correlation Analysis of Plant and Ear-kernel Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 27-32. |
[5] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[6] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[7] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[8] | SUN Ge, JIE Weiguang, HU Wei, ZHANG Yingzhi, QIAO Wei, WEI Lina, JIANG Yitong, BAI Li. Effects of Mycorrhizal Fungi and Mycorrhizal Helper Bacteria on Crop Development: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 88-92. |
[9] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[10] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[11] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[12] | DENG Yushuai, WANG Yuguang, YU Lihua, GENG Gui. Effects of Waterlogging Stress on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sugar Beet Seedlings Under Different Soil Salinity and Alkalinity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 18-23. |
[13] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[14] | LIU Xiaohang, MA Shuqing, ZHAO Jing, QUAN Hujie, DENG Kuicai, CHAI Qingrong. Yield Response of Japonica Rice of Northeast China to Low Temperature in Different Time Periods of Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 91-98. |
[15] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||