Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (36): 12-17.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0030
Special Issue: 玉米
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ge Xuanliang(), Qian Chunrong(
), Yu Yang, Gong Xiujie, Jiang Yubo
Received:
2020-04-22
Revised:
2020-06-28
Online:
2020-12-25
Published:
2020-12-23
Contact:
Qian Chunrong
E-mail:gexuanliang@163.com;qcr3906@163.com
CLC Number:
Ge Xuanliang, Qian Chunrong, Yu Yang, Gong Xiujie, Jiang Yubo. Maize Growth and Development and Yield Formation Under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(36): 12-17.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0030
种植模式 | 秸秆还田方式 | 作业流程 |
---|---|---|
65 cm均匀垄作 | 秸秆离田 | 机收,秸秆全部离田,40马力拖拉机带旋耕机旋耕起垄,镇压1遍 |
68 cm均匀行平作 | 碎混还田 | 机收,秸秆全量还田,还田机二次粉碎作业,210马力以上拖拉机带联合整地机进行碎混还田,将秸秆混拌于0~20 cm耕层内,液压耙30°角交叉重耙2遍以上,秸度地表覆盖度30% |
136 cm大垄双行垄作 | 深翻还田 | 机收,秸秆全量还田,还田机二次粉碎作业,210马力拖拉机带液压翻转犁进行翻埋还田,翻埋深度25~30 cm,液压耙30°角交叉重耙2遍,耙深15~17 cm,起大垄,镇压1遍 |
种植模式 | 秸秆还田方式 | 作业流程 |
---|---|---|
65 cm均匀垄作 | 秸秆离田 | 机收,秸秆全部离田,40马力拖拉机带旋耕机旋耕起垄,镇压1遍 |
68 cm均匀行平作 | 碎混还田 | 机收,秸秆全量还田,还田机二次粉碎作业,210马力以上拖拉机带联合整地机进行碎混还田,将秸秆混拌于0~20 cm耕层内,液压耙30°角交叉重耙2遍以上,秸度地表覆盖度30% |
136 cm大垄双行垄作 | 深翻还田 | 机收,秸秆全量还田,还田机二次粉碎作业,210马力拖拉机带液压翻转犁进行翻埋还田,翻埋深度25~30 cm,液压耙30°角交叉重耙2遍,耙深15~17 cm,起大垄,镇压1遍 |
年份 | 种植模式 | 保苗密度/(104株/hm2) | 变异度/% | 株距/cm | 变异度/% | 叶片数 | 变异度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 6.23±0.089 b B | 1.16 | 26.00±1.41 b A | 43.41 | 6 | 16.16 |
M1 | 6.08±0.085 b B | 1.14 | 28.93±0.40 a A | 37.12 | 6 | 7.95 | |
M2 | 7.21± 0.389 a A | 4.41 | 21.63±1.15 c B | 26.20 | 5 | 11.91 | |
2018 | CK | 6.21±0.089 b B | 1.17 | 25.23±1.37 b AB | 43.30 | 6 | 9.60 |
M1 | 6.27± 0.084 b B | 1.10 | 28.33±1.02 a A | 35.21 | 6 | 3.18 | |
M2 | 7.35±0.388 a A | 4.32 | 21.63±1.15 c B | 27.02 | 6 | 4.04 |
年份 | 种植模式 | 保苗密度/(104株/hm2) | 变异度/% | 株距/cm | 变异度/% | 叶片数 | 变异度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 6.23±0.089 b B | 1.16 | 26.00±1.41 b A | 43.41 | 6 | 16.16 |
M1 | 6.08±0.085 b B | 1.14 | 28.93±0.40 a A | 37.12 | 6 | 7.95 | |
M2 | 7.21± 0.389 a A | 4.41 | 21.63±1.15 c B | 26.20 | 5 | 11.91 | |
2018 | CK | 6.21±0.089 b B | 1.17 | 25.23±1.37 b AB | 43.30 | 6 | 9.60 |
M1 | 6.27± 0.084 b B | 1.10 | 28.33±1.02 a A | 35.21 | 6 | 3.18 | |
M2 | 7.35±0.388 a A | 4.32 | 21.63±1.15 c B | 27.02 | 6 | 4.04 |
年份 | 种植模式 | 穗数/(104穗/hm2) | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 4.95±0.52 a A | 554±6.03 a A | 449.7±5.95 a A | 9854.7±412.2 a A |
M1 | 4.90±0.42 a A | 562±4.37 a A | 435.6±3.94 a A | 9905.9±318.5 a A | |
M2 | 5.10±0.47 a A | 565±3.61 a A | 435.9±3.91 a A | 10537.3±718.9 a A | |
2018 | CK | 5.23±0.27 a A | 518±5.51 a A | 460.0±10.73 a A | 9332.7±598.6 a A |
M1 | 5.54±0.45 a A | 514±12.12 a A | 466.5±5.18 a A | 10610.7±916.3 a A | |
M2 | 5.70±0.28 a A | 510±13.50 a A | 462.2±11.41 a A | 10974.5±504.8 a A |
年份 | 种植模式 | 穗数/(104穗/hm2) | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 4.95±0.52 a A | 554±6.03 a A | 449.7±5.95 a A | 9854.7±412.2 a A |
M1 | 4.90±0.42 a A | 562±4.37 a A | 435.6±3.94 a A | 9905.9±318.5 a A | |
M2 | 5.10±0.47 a A | 565±3.61 a A | 435.9±3.91 a A | 10537.3±718.9 a A | |
2018 | CK | 5.23±0.27 a A | 518±5.51 a A | 460.0±10.73 a A | 9332.7±598.6 a A |
M1 | 5.54±0.45 a A | 514±12.12 a A | 466.5±5.18 a A | 10610.7±916.3 a A | |
M2 | 5.70±0.28 a A | 510±13.50 a A | 462.2±11.41 a A | 10974.5±504.8 a A |
[1] |
钱春荣, 于洋, 宫秀杰, 等. 黑龙江省不同年代玉米杂交种氮肥利用效率对种植密度和施氮水平的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2012,38(11):2069-2077.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02069 URL |
[2] | 佟玉欣, 李玉影, 刘双全, 等. 黑龙江春玉米籽粒产量与氮素吸收变化特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(5):1094-1102. |
[3] |
Andrate F H, Calvino P, Cirilo A, et al. Yield responses to narrow rows depends on increased radiation interception[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002,94(5):975-980.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.0975 URL |
[4] |
Reta-sanchez D G, Fower J L. Canopy light environment and yield of narrow-row cotton as affected by canopy architecture[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002,94(6):1317-1323.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.1317 URL |
[5] | 冯爱青, 张民, 李成亮, 等. 控释氮肥对土壤酶活性与土壤养分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014,28(3):177-184. |
[6] |
李伟, 李絮花, 李海燕, 等. 控释尿素与普通尿素混施对夏玉米产量和氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012,38(4):699-706.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00699 URL |
[7] | Liu T D, Song F B. Maize photosynthesis and microclimate within the canopies at grain-filling stage in response to narrow-wide row planting patterns. Photosynthetica, 2012,50(2):215-222. |
[8] | Liu T D, Song F B. Light interception and radiation use efficiency response to narrow-wide row planting patterns in maize. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2012,6(3):506-513. |
[9] | Awal M A, Koshi H, Ikeda T. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006,139(1/2):74-83. |
[10] | 卫丽, 熊友才, Ma B L, 等. 不同群体结构夏玉米灌浆期光合特征和产量变化[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(9):2524-2531. |
[11] |
刘铁东, 宋凤斌. 不同宽窄行种植方式下玉米穗位叶的光合生理特征[J]. 华北农学报, 2014,29(1):117-121.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2014.01.022 URL |
[12] | 高亚男, 曹庆军, 韩海飞, 等. 不同行距对春玉米产量和光合速率的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2010,18(2):73-76. |
[13] |
Bullock D G, Nielsen R L, Nyquist W E. A growth analysis comparison of corn grown in conventional and equidistant plant spacing[J]. Crop Science, 1987,28(2):254-258.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800020015x URL |
[14] |
Sharratt B S, Mcwillimas D A. Microclimatic and rooting characteristics of narrow-row versus conventional-row corn[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2005,97(4):1129-1135.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.0292 URL |
[15] | 杨利华, 张丽华, 张全国, 等. 种植样式对高密度夏玉米产量和株高整齐度的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2006,14(6):122-124. |
[16] |
吕丽华, 陶洪斌, 夏来坤, 等. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2008,34(3):447-455.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00447 URL |
[17] | 董树亭, 高荣岐, 胡昌浩, 等. 玉米花粒期群体光合性能与高产潜力研究[J]. 作物学报, 1997,23(3):318-325. |
[18] |
Zelitchi I. The close relationship between net photosynjournal and crop yield[J]. BioScience, 1982,32(10):796-802.
doi: 10.2307/1308973 URL |
[19] | 于强, 王天铎, 刘建栋, 等. 玉米株型与冠层光合作用的数学模拟研究I. 模型与验证[J]. 作物学报, 1998,24(1):7-15. |
[20] | 王敬亚, 齐华, 梁熠, 等. 种植方式对春玉米光合特性、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2009,17(5):113-115. |
[21] | 武志海, 张治安, 陈展宇, 等. 大垄双行种植玉米群体冠层结构及光合特性的解析[J]. 玉米科学, 2005,13(4):62-65. |
[22] | 梁熠, 齐华, 王敬亚, 等. 宽窄行栽培对玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2009,17(4):97-100. |
[23] | 杨克军, 李明, 李振华. 栽培方式与群体结构对寒地玉米物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(11):157-160. |
[24] | 范秀玲, 李凤海, 史振声, 等. 玉米偏垄宽窄行种植方式的增产作用和生理特性研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2010,18(1):108-111. |
[25] |
杨吉顺, 高辉远, 刘鹏, 等. 种植密度和行距配置对超高产夏玉米群体光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010,36(7):1226-1233.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01226 URL |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. |
[3] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. |
[4] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[5] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[6] | JI Kun, WANG Bin, ZHAO Bowen, XUE Hao, WU Jianmin, ZHU Xiaojian, WANG Yixin, ZHAO Haijun, HAN Zanping. Different Maize Germplasm Materials: Grey Correlation Analysis of Plant and Ear-kernel Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 27-32. |
[7] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[8] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[9] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[10] | SUN Ge, JIE Weiguang, HU Wei, ZHANG Yingzhi, QIAO Wei, WEI Lina, JIANG Yitong, BAI Li. Effects of Mycorrhizal Fungi and Mycorrhizal Helper Bacteria on Crop Development: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 88-92. |
[11] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. |
[12] | LI He, LI Wenkuan, ZHAO Xiaolin, WANG Xingbing. Studies on Fish Resource Development and Utilization in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yalu River [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 141-146. |
[13] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[14] | YIN Tingting, LI Zhihui, SU Jiahe, WU Shidi, XU Hongyan, HE Shuai, LIU Pei, LI Xiangqian. Nano-selenium Prepared by Biological Method: Research Progress and Application Prospect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 33-41. |
[15] | DONG Wencai, LIU Xianbin, LI Hongmei, ZHAO Shuangmei, BAO Jinmei, SHEN Jianping, LIANG Fang, LU Mei. Effects of Calcium Supply with Varying Levels on the Growth and Development of Woody Ornamental Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 42-50. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||