Multiple Traits of Processing Tomato Varieties in Kuitun of Xinjiang: Comprehensive Evaluation

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0797

Abstract

Abstract:

Through comprehensive evaluation of multiple traits of processing tomato varieties, the study aims to provide technical support for identification and screening of excellent germplasm resources. 9 processing tomato varieties (lines) were selected for variety comparison test, and 13 agronomic traits were analyzed and determined. The principal component analysis and cluster analysis (PCA-CA) were used to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the main agronomic traits of processing tomato varieties. The average coefficient of variation of 13 agronomic traits was 10.23%. By principal component analysis, 13 agronomic traits could be divided into 3 main indexes: fruit appearance quality factor, fruit yield factor and fruit intrinsic quality factor, which could accurately evaluate processing tomato varieties. Plant height, weight of single fruit, longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter, average yield, soluble solid content, lycopene content and total acid content were the main traits. ‘T60’ and ‘Xinfan 15’ ranked the first and second on comprehensive scores. Cluster analysis of the 9 processing tomato varieties was carried out by group-average method, and the varieties could be divided into 5 groups. The comprehensive evaluation system established in this study can provide reference for breeding high-quality processing tomato varieties.

Key words: processing tomato, varieties (lines), agronomic traits, principal analysis, cluster analysis, evaluation index

CLC Number:

S641.2

HUANG Min, BUKA Ouerna, SONG Mei, DU Jing, MAO Pengzhi, LI Zemin. Multiple Traits of Processing Tomato Varieties in Kuitun of Xinjiang: Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 25-29.

Figures/Tables 5

References 23

[1]	李英, 吕国华, 薛琳, 等. 不同加工番茄新品系主要品质性状比较试验[J]. 蔬菜, 2015(10):23-26.
[2]	赵雯. 中国番茄国际竞争力分析[J]. 中国统计, 2008(12):19-21.
[3]	齐士发, 石强, 王新燕, 等. 新疆加工番茄产业原料生产中存在的问题与对策[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2008(11):81-85.
[4]	齐晓辉. 新疆番茄加工产业发展中存在的问题与对策研究[J]. 商业现代化, 2008(3):330-331.
[5]	许立志. 加工番茄新品种评价及抗逆性鉴定[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2017.
[6]	杨中, 张静, 汤兆星. 新疆鲜食葡萄品质评价指标体系的建立[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(12):7004-7007.
[7]	LIU C H, XU L, GAO H Y, et al. Water quality evaluation in representative lake based on principal component analysis[A]. // Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering (RSETE), 2011 International Conference on IEEE[C]. 2011:4704-4707.
[8]	虞晓芬, 傅玳. 多指标综合评价方法综述[J]. 统计与决策, 2004(11):119-121.
[9]	CHENG Yongqian, SONG Qianwu, MA Hongmei. Research on optimization of water quality monitoring sites using principal component analysis and cluster analysis[A].// Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring (CDCIEM), 2011 International Conference on IEEE[C]. 2011:570-573.
[10]	NIU C, WANG Q, CHEN H, et al. Application of principal component analysis and cluster analysis to evaluation of black soil degradation in Jilin[A].// Multimedia Technology (ICMT), 2011 International Conference on IEEE[C]. 2011:1467-1470.
[11]	曾宪文, 彭重华, 梁智娇. 模糊数学法在竹子观赏性评价中的应用[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2009, 28(3):29-33.
[12]	LIU X Q, WANG J, ZHANG G D, et al. Grey relational analysis on the relation between marine environmental factors and oxidation reduction potential[J]. Chinese journal of oceanology and limnology, 2009, 27(3):583-586. doi: 10.1007/s00343-009-9152-9 URL
[13]	VÁCLAV Mídl, MIROSLAV Kárn, MARTIN Ámal, et al. Smoothness prior information in principal component analysis of dynamic image data[A].// Biennial International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging[C]. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001:225-231.
[14]	张振良, 黄小兰, 薛林, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的甜糯玉米新组合育种潜力评价[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(2):19-25.
[15]	程晓明, 程婧晔, 胡文静, 等. 23个小麦品种春化特性主成分分析及聚类分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(8):64-68.
[16]	彭勇菲, 李学营, 彭建营. 19个早中熟鲜食枣品种果实品质分析与综合评价[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2019, 42(6):51-56,64.
[17]	吕英忠, 李卓, 张拥兵, 等. 不同柿果实品质分析及综合评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020(18).
[18]	庞胜群, 赵飏, 李格. 灰色关联分析法综合评价不同品种加工番茄的品质[J]. 石河子大学学报:自然科学版, 2006(6):682-684.
[19]	袁莉, 姜波. 加工番茄可溶性固形物含量与相关性状的关联研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2011, 42(4):504-507.
[20]	沈甜, 牛锐敏, 黄小晶, 等. 基于层次-关联度和主成分分析的无核鲜食葡萄品质评价[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(3):53-60,67.
[21]	刘永志. 主成分分析和聚类在科学技术数据分析中的应用[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016.
[22]	韩泽群, 姜波. 加工番茄品种多性状综合评价方法研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(2):357-365.
[23]	王亮, 李艳, 刘志刚, 等. 新疆加工番茄自交系产量与主要农艺性状关系的研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(6):2517-2523.

材料名称	K₁产量/(kg/hm²)	K₂单果重/(g/果)	K₃可溶性固形物/%	K₄番茄红素/(mg/100 g)	K₅总酸/%	K₆株高/cm	K₇平均分枝数/个
NDM843	95245.80	56.23	4.51	14.90	3.42	62.67	4.67
新番15号	112858.20	68.90	5.83	15.53	3.27	77.00	5.33
新番29号	112114.35	69.03	5.06	15.33	2.88	76.67	5.00
新番30号	113726.40	69.43	5.05	15.10	2.82	76.67	5.00
新番71号	123421.80	49.53	5.79	15.23	3.29	59.33	5.33
石番45号	132470.85	41.87	4.55	13.90	3.04	55.33	4.33
T77	113414.10	68.07	4.99	14.63	3.13	74.00	5.00
T60	126271.20	65.83	5.67	15.07	3.06	80.67	5.33
T160	125648.40	61.90	5.28	14.20	2.78	76.67	4.67
平均值	117241.2	61.20	5.19	14.88	3.08	71.00	4.96
标准差	695.19	9.38	0.47	0.51	0.21	8.73	0.33
变异系数/%	8.89	15.33	8.98	3.41	6.83	12.30	6.65
材料名称	K₈单株果数/个	K₉纵径/cm	K₁₀横径/cm	K₁₁果形指数	K₁₂生育期	K₁₃固酸比/%
NDM843	40.33	6.17	5.03	1.22	85	1.32
新番15号	39.00	7.72	5.93	1.30	88	1.78
新番29号	38.67	7.70	5.57	1.38	90	1.76
新番30号	39.00	7.81	5.72	1.36	90	1.79
新番71号	59.33	5.56	4.10	1.35	83	1.76
石番45号	75.33	5.04	3.88	1.29	86	1.5
T77	39.67	7.26	5.15	1.40	88	1.59
T60	45.67	7.62	5.58	1.36	94	1.85
T160	48.33	7.17	5.08	1.41	85	1.90
平均值	47.26	6.89	5.12	1.34	87.67	1.69
标准差	11.80	0.98	0.67	0.06	3.16	0.18
变异系数/%	24.97	14.22	13.06	4.27	3.61	10.42

材料名称	K₁产量/(kg/hm²)	K₂单果重/(g/果)	K₃可溶性固形物/%	K₄番茄红素/(mg/100 g)	K₅总酸/%	K₆株高/cm	K₇平均分枝数/个
NDM843	95245.80	56.23	4.51	14.90	3.42	62.67	4.67
新番15号	112858.20	68.90	5.83	15.53	3.27	77.00	5.33
新番29号	112114.35	69.03	5.06	15.33	2.88	76.67	5.00
新番30号	113726.40	69.43	5.05	15.10	2.82	76.67	5.00
新番71号	123421.80	49.53	5.79	15.23	3.29	59.33	5.33
石番45号	132470.85	41.87	4.55	13.90	3.04	55.33	4.33
T77	113414.10	68.07	4.99	14.63	3.13	74.00	5.00
T60	126271.20	65.83	5.67	15.07	3.06	80.67	5.33
T160	125648.40	61.90	5.28	14.20	2.78	76.67	4.67
平均值	117241.2	61.20	5.19	14.88	3.08	71.00	4.96
标准差	695.19	9.38	0.47	0.51	0.21	8.73	0.33
变异系数/%	8.89	15.33	8.98	3.41	6.83	12.30	6.65
材料名称	K₈单株果数/个	K₉纵径/cm	K₁₀横径/cm	K₁₁果形指数	K₁₂生育期	K₁₃固酸比/%
NDM843	40.33	6.17	5.03	1.22	85	1.32
新番15号	39.00	7.72	5.93	1.30	88	1.78
新番29号	38.67	7.70	5.57	1.38	90	1.76
新番30号	39.00	7.81	5.72	1.36	90	1.79
新番71号	59.33	5.56	4.10	1.35	83	1.76
石番45号	75.33	5.04	3.88	1.29	86	1.5
T77	39.67	7.26	5.15	1.40	88	1.59
T60	45.67	7.62	5.58	1.36	94	1.85
T160	48.33	7.17	5.08	1.41	85	1.90
平均值	47.26	6.89	5.12	1.34	87.67	1.69
标准差	11.80	0.98	0.67	0.06	3.16	0.18
变异系数/%	24.97	14.22	13.06	4.27	3.61	10.42

主成分	特征值	贡献率/%	累计贡献率/%
1	6.7722	52.0941	52.0941
2	2.9280	22.5229	74.6170
3	2.0157	15.5052	90.1222
4	0.6938	5.3372	95.4594
5	0.2948	2.2674	97.7268
6	0.2543	1.9558	99.6826
7	0.0307	0.2364	99.9190
8	0.0105	0.0810	100.0000

主成分	特征值	贡献率/%	累计贡献率/%
1	6.7722	52.0941	52.0941
2	2.9280	22.5229	74.6170
3	2.0157	15.5052	90.1222
4	0.6938	5.3372	95.4594
5	0.2948	2.2674	97.7268
6	0.2543	1.9558	99.6826
7	0.0307	0.2364	99.9190
8	0.0105	0.0810	100.0000

农艺性状	T₁	T₂	T₃
平均产量	-0.0757	0.5355	0.1575
单果重	0.3658	-0.0854	-0.1574
可溶性固形物	0.2109	0.1476	0.5458
番茄红素	0.2489	-0.2738	0.3496
总酸	-0.1277	-0.4198	0.3721
株高	0.3660	0.0754	-0.1443
分枝数	0.2654	-0.0586	0.4855
单株果数	-0.3115	0.2859	0.1509
纵径	0.3723	-0.0163	-0.1625
横径	0.3514	-0.1554	-0.1497
果形指数	0.1957	0.4134	-0.0507
生育期	0.2651	0.0563	-0.1536
固酸比	0.2561	0.3790	0.1939